HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction


Two World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 3:11 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Smile NEW YORK | 200 Greenwich - 2 WTC | 1,270 FT | 80 FLOORS | ON HOLD











Tower 2

NEW YORK TIMES-Dave Dunlap

Lord Foster’s Tower 2, with a rooftop of four enormous diamonds steeply inclined toward the memorial below, would be as high as the Empire State Building. Tower 3 by Lord Rogers, framed boldly by an exoskeletal framework of diagonal beams, would reach a pinnacle of 1,255 feet at its corner antennas. Even the smallest and subtlest building among them, Mr. Maki’s Tower 4, would be taller than the Citigroup Center in midtown

and

By virtue of its size and aesthetic bravura, Lord Foster’s Tower 2 at 200 Greenwich Street, between Vesey and Fulton Streets, may draw the most public attention. The 1,265-foot building is to have 78 floors, 62 for offices, four trading floors and the rest for retail and mechanical space. The uppermost of the rooftop diamonds will be a tripod shaped antenna whose pinnacle is 1,350 feet above street level, just 18 feet shy of the Freedom Tower’s parapet.

Construction of Tower 2 will require the removal of the Vesey Street staircase, also known as the survivors’ stairway, which is the only aboveground remnant of the original trade center that is still in place. It served as an escape route for hundreds of people on 9/11.

The main shaft of Tower 2 is to be divided by notches into quadrants, culminating in diamond forms that are meant to lead the eye down to the memorial plaza. The surface of these structures will be a porous screen on which snow and ice are not expected to accumulate; always a hazard on a steeply pitched roof.


_________________________________________________________________________



UPDATED VERSION



1.



2.



3.



4.



5.



6.



7.



8.



9.



10.



11.



12.



13.



14.



15.



16.



17.



18.



19.



20.



21.



22.



23.



24.



25.




26.



27.

__________________
ASDFGHJK

Last edited by NYguy; Jun 13, 2015 at 8:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 3:37 PM
Daquan13 Daquan13 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: East Boston, MA. USA
Posts: 7,746
Great pics!!

The top of Tower 2 still loks a bit reminiscent of Foster's previous design for
Ground Zero.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 4:37 PM
Jularc's Avatar
Jularc Jularc is offline
Time/Space
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,363
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 12:23 AM
CoolCzech's Avatar
CoolCzech CoolCzech is offline
Frigidus Maximus
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daquan13 View Post
Great pics!!

The top of Tower 2 still loks a bit reminiscent of Foster's previous design for
Ground Zero.
Hey, nice to see you posting again, Daquan! Where ya been?
__________________
http://tinyurl.com/2acxb5t


I ❤️ NY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 4:57 PM
sfcity1 sfcity1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 144
Cool, cool, cool! Now this is great modern architecture. And the top floor where people can go to is at 1265 feet. I love the windows on the slanted windows at the top!

Last edited by sfcity1; Apr 28, 2007 at 5:04 PM. Reason: Comment not needed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2007, 3:48 AM
aluminum's Avatar
aluminum aluminum is offline
I love boxes.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfcity1 View Post
Cool, cool, cool! Now this is great modern architecture. And the top floor where people can go to is at 1265 feet. I love the windows on the slanted windows at the top!
I know its a very old post, but is this guy right ? 1265 feet ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2007, 2:21 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
Aluminum, I highly recommend you shut up because

A. Your posts in this thread have been no less than embarassing to read.

B. You are probably going to get yourself suspended/banned

C. You are totally spamming this thread with like 50 posts for every one someone else posts...

Oh yeah, this building rocks, admit it. We would all (including Aluminum) love to see this in Chicago...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2007, 3:17 AM
aluminum's Avatar
aluminum aluminum is offline
I love boxes.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 637
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Aluminum, I highly recommend you shut up because

A. Your posts in this thread have been no less than embarassing to read.

B. You are probably going to get yourself suspended/banned

C. You are totally spamming this thread with like 50 posts for every one someone else posts...

Oh yeah, this building rocks, admit it. We would all (including Aluminum) love to see this in Chicago...
Chicago ! CHICAGO !?

Ain't this building in New York ?

Last edited by Swede; Jun 6, 2007 at 7:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2007, 10:21 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum View Post
Chicago ! CHICAGO !?

Ain't this building in New York ?
Yes, that's what I said, Chicago, I, and just every other Chicago forumer, would feel fortunate to have this building built in Chicago... Read before responding, if you would have, you would know that I never said it is being built in Chicago, but that we would all love to steal this design from NY.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2007, 4:17 PM
nygirl1 nygirl1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by aluminum View Post
I know its a very old post, but is this guy right ? 1265 feet ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
The 1,265-foot building is to have 78 floors, 62 for offices, four trading floors and the rest for retail and mechanical space. The uppermost of the rooftop diamonds will be a tripod shaped antenna whose pinnacle is 1,350 feet above street level, just 18 feet shy of the Freedom Tower’s parapet.
First post usually has the information on height you are looking for aluminum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 5:03 PM
pablosan pablosan is offline
Up Up and Away
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,728
That looks awesome!
__________________
DenZone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 5:18 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,112
The best of the new WTC towers in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 7:33 PM
pico44's Avatar
pico44 pico44 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,450
This tower is so incredibly beautiful. I really don't think there is a more beautiful proposal out there right now. Hopefully Silverstien comes through and does the rendering justice with high-quality materials.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2007, 10:27 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kngkyle2 View Post
The best of the new WTC towers in my opinion.
I agree, especially since I find the main tower fortress like, misproportioned and unattractive. NYC could and should do much better than the current version of WTC 1.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 7:38 PM
Scruffy's Avatar
Scruffy Scruffy is offline
low-riding
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,966
Now is it artistic liberties on the renders or is the building's color really going to change from bottom to top? Because ive noticed it in every render but they don't do it to tower 3 or 1 inthe group shots so it might not be shadow. i dont know.
__________________
My name is Steve
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 9:23 PM
pico44's Avatar
pico44 pico44 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scruffy View Post
Now is it artistic liberties on the renders or is the building's color really going to change from bottom to top? Because ive noticed it in every render but they don't do it to tower 3 or 1 inthe group shots so it might not be shadow. i dont know.

I've noticed that as well. I have to believe there will be a gradual color change for the same reason you mentioned. It's gonna be nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 8:10 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,338
Beautiful.
__________________
Nevermore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 27, 2011, 6:09 AM
STR's Avatar
STR STR is offline
Because I'm Clever!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by chengliu View Post
Construction of Tower 2 will require the removal of the Vesey Street staircase, also known as the survivors’ stairway, which is the only aboveground remnant of the original trade center that is still in place. It served as an escape route for hundreds of people on 9/11
That hunk of concrete was removed from the site years ago. I believe it's already been placed in the memorial.
__________________
There are six phases to every project 1) enthusiasm, 2) disillusionment, 3) panic, 4) search for the guilty, 5) punishment of the innocent, 6) praise for the non-participants. - Guy Tozzoli
Build your own Model Skyscrapers** New York City 2015 3D Model W/ New WTC ** World Trade Center (1971-2001) 3D Model
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 9:12 PM
Stephenapolis's Avatar
Stephenapolis Stephenapolis is offline
The True Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,573
This is easily my favorite tower for the new WTC complex.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2007, 7:30 PM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephenapolis View Post
This is easily my favorite tower for the new WTC complex.
I'm with ya on that one. Great tower.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.