HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6041  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 2:27 AM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcat23 View Post
I think you misunderstood me. I just want them to paint the vehicles red; I don't want a clunky 1940's style streetcar running down Broadway.
They should definitely paint them red, although technically the local streetcars downtown were LARy cars and they were painted yellow. The red Pacific Electric were the long distance interurban type cars.
     
     
  #6042  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 3:05 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy View Post
IIRC they pretty much ruled out using historic cars because of ADA requirements (they need low floor step-free boarding)
Then how is San Francisco able to have their historic streetcars in use?
     
     
  #6043  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 4:41 AM
LAofAnaheim LAofAnaheim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
Then how is San Francisco able to have their historic streetcars in use?
Because it was built and operated before the ADA rules. Hence the reason there are subway stations in NYC, Philly and Boston that have no elevators; just stairs. It was built before ADA requirements were put into place. Unlike LA's system, which was built after ADA, each station has to have the ability for handicapped people to access the station. ADA was enacted in 1990.
     
     
  #6044  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 8:23 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAofAnaheim View Post
Because it was built and operated before the ADA rules. Hence the reason there are subway stations in NYC, Philly and Boston that have no elevators; just stairs. It was built before ADA requirements were put into place. Unlike LA's system, which was built after ADA, each station has to have the ability for handicapped people to access the station. ADA was enacted in 1990.
This may also help explain why LA subway station portals tend to be rather large compared to the other cities you mentioned.

I mean I was in NY last month (thankfully), and I have to say ive seen stairs in houses wider than those found in the NY subway entrances.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #6045  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 9:11 AM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
I didn't get a picture, but Avant has started to rise above ground level. The building on Flower looks like it's moving faster than the one on the Figueroa side.
     
     
  #6046  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 10:17 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
This may also help explain why LA subway station portals tend to be rather large compared to the other cities you mentioned.

I mean I was in NY last month (thankfully), and I have to say ive seen stairs in houses wider than those found in the NY subway entrances.
Also, L.A. just likes big subway portals. New York is building new subway portals for their new subway line, and they are not nearly as big as ours, while still being ADA compliant.
     
     
  #6047  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 10:42 AM
Suffice Suffice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles Metro
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by laphilman View Post
Thank you for a wonderful survey of LA in pictures. http://urbandiachrony.wordpress.com
That blog made me really sad
     
     
  #6048  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 6:18 PM
brudy's Avatar
brudy brudy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAofAnaheim View Post
Because it was built and operated before the ADA rules. Hence the reason there are subway stations in NYC, Philly and Boston that have no elevators; just stairs. It was built before ADA requirements were put into place. Unlike LA's system, which was built after ADA, each station has to have the ability for handicapped people to access the station. ADA was enacted in 1990.
Boston has recently redone some of their portals and IIRC it was because of accessibility. They added elevators, but the elevators entrances are separate from the stairway entrances. All of these new entrances are rather small, but then cities like NY and Boston don't have the space to build entrances like here in LA.
     
     
  #6049  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 6:25 PM
brudy's Avatar
brudy brudy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suffice View Post
That blog made me really sad
Seriously. I had no idea Skid Row was residential through the 50s.

http://urbandiachrony.wordpress.com/2012...-515-519-east-fourth-street-c-1910-2012/
     
     
  #6050  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 8:46 PM
ConstructDTLA's Avatar
ConstructDTLA ConstructDTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 1,454
Little does anyone know, work has silently started on Trinity Auditorium
     
     
  #6051  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2012, 9:16 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterK View Post
Little does anyone know, work has silently started on Trinity Auditorium
Did they hire mimes to do the construction?

And there have been people working on that building for years seems like repairing the roof and last I checked, cut down that forest of weeds that were growing from that ugly dirt lot.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #6052  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 6:22 AM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
Did they hire mimes to do the construction?

And there have been people working on that building for years seems like repairing the roof and last I checked, cut down that forest of weeds that were growing from that ugly dirt lot.
ya theres been a crew of a whopping 1 or 2 there every day for the last 2 years. They have added some shit on the roof and done some other minimal work, but nothing crazy just yet. its so sad that Cherrit group takes so long to do shit as they have 3 very strategically important properties.
     
     
  #6053  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 8:36 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
From BringhamYen.com


http://brighamyen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/888-Olive-Rendering.jpg

Quote:
Earlier this year in March, news came that Vancouver-based Onni Group was planning to develop a new 32-story luxury apartment tower (on a surface parking lot) at the intersection of 9th and Olive adjacent to the historic 1926 Coast Savings Building. Plans were to break ground by the summer, but delays are pretty much expected for large significant projects like these. Nevertheless, groundbreaking for the new tower, currently named “888 Olive,” will be soon as a new construction sign was installed this week to direct drivers to another parking lot around the corner. According to an onsite source, groundbreaking was “supposed to be on December 1, 2012.” So we could see construction fencing and equipment move in by the next week or so.

888 Olive will inject a significant boost to the area near 9th/Olive, which is currently surrounded by surface parking lots (aka “dead zones”) and a lack of commercial activity. The project entails 283 units (according to the DT News) and 11,000 square feet of commercial retail space. When the new tower is completed, the entire intersection will be activated and will be only a stone’s throw from the future Empire Hotel a block away.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #6054  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 10:33 PM
ziggy331's Avatar
ziggy331 ziggy331 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Downtown LA
Posts: 144
The tower itself looks better than it did in original renderings however I'm not a big fan of the base. It looks dated already...
     
     
  #6055  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 11:13 PM
Muji's Avatar
Muji Muji is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,188
Exciting news about 888 Olive. I was actually about to say that I much prefer the new rendering all around to the old one. I especially like the base actually, which seems like a tasteful homage to much of the Mid-century Modern that LA does so well. It does look very much 'budget Richard Meier' but maybe that's a good thing. To each his own, I suppose.
__________________
My blog of then and now photos of LA: http://urbandiachrony.wordpress.com
     
     
  #6056  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 11:30 PM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muji View Post
Exciting news about 888 Olive. I was actually about to say that I much prefer the new rendering all around to the old one. I especially like the base actually, which seems like a tasteful homage to much of the Mid-century Modern that LA does so well. It does look very much 'budget Richard Meier' but maybe that's a good thing. To each his own, I suppose.
Richard Meier is the first thing I thought of as well. This is a much better rendering then before. Excited to see this go forward.

EDIT: I do wish, thought, that this tower made some reference to it's historic next-door neighbor, in terms of massing.

Last edited by Illithid Dude; Dec 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM.
     
     
  #6057  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 11:44 PM
Mojeda101's Avatar
Mojeda101 Mojeda101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DTLA
Posts: 1,474
I was actually about to ask what was new concerning the tower. Glad to know there is another spot to go to when I take pictures. It's so close to 8th and Hope, so it wouldn't be a problem for my photo montages
     
     
  #6058  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 11:54 PM
Kingofthehill's Avatar
Kingofthehill Kingofthehill is offline
International
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,046
Very Toronto/Vancouver/Miami waterfront-ish. Looking forward to seeing it take a big bite out of the many deadzones over there!
     
     
  #6059  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2012, 11:55 PM
Gram3000's Avatar
Gram3000 Gram3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bellflower CaLi, DtLa bound always!
Posts: 193
LOOK CITYWATCH, NOO PARKI, ERR, UH THAT CAR THINGY , it sure does look like they did utilize that new ordinance, looks like just the 1st 2 floors are dedicated to vehicles, Overall, a really contemporary & sleek look! Nice!
     
     
  #6060  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2012, 12:38 AM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
Ava Little Tokyo progress, today

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.