Another long night and another long post - if something doesn't make sense, I am happy to clarify. Or, you can just chuck the whole thing out.
Freeway, I don't have enough energy to respond completely to your multiple posts since I was last logged in, especially when I'm not sure whether you are just baiting, or if you truly believe the things you write.
1) The strength of the downtown and midtown retail/restaurant scene has never been healthier; a closed Scholtzsky's is nothing when you look at the unique, one-of-a-kind and thoughtful
destinations that our local talent is putting together, one after another. The fact that The Mod's success has been so overwhelming that they're confident moving toward a pay per hour model on the corner of one of the most hideous skyscrapers in town is one of many of the finer points. Others have mentioned the rest, but besides a few high profile pockets of empty retail - which shows a problem with that building/agency instead of the market - there's a true momentum growing, and with ReinventPHX, maybe there is a shot at fostering true stakeholders and ambassadors for this next generation.
I also listed the several residential developments proposed in Midtown within the last 6 months or so, which is a rate not seen since the boom. I don't know if you chose to ignore it or what, but there IS a market for urban residential, and there has been all along, as shown as far back as 2011 when apartment vacancy rates were nearly full. Unfortunately, the only products to come online since then have been for students, seniors, or low-income residents, shutting out the class of people who want to enjoy this growing energy, but are hindered in one way or the other.
Need for Densification
When I list other cities, I don't do so because I expect Phoenix developers to thrown down 20+ story condos in Garfield. I reference them because I hadn't realized how little other cities stalled post-recession having focused solely on Phoenix development. Other major cities are finding the market and exploiting it and continuing to push high quality, high density projects within their cores while Phoenix has resorted to 3-story lofts on McKinley and infill work - work that is MUCH needed, but needs to eventually connect urban destinations to have a point. And, it's centralizing, densifying and energizing those urban destinations that has yet to happen.
The Local on Roosevelt, Bitter and Twister on Jefferson, The Mod on Thomas. Low density infill on Roosevelt/1st, low density infill on McKinley/3rd, low density infill on Lewis/Central... yes, there is light rail. Yes, there seems to be a large enough market for the moment to support all of these ventures. But, my major point is - and, yes, Soleri, I know it gets lost in my sea of letters - that we continue to make the same mistake consistently and expect different results. And, with these inspiring local efforts being made, it's even more maddening to see the City and those in power waste precious opportunities to create an urban fabric within a city that has had to come back from literally nothing.
To allow two campuses to consume 2/3 of downtown land and not hold them to the set of urban standards we took years to create is an insult to all on Roosevelt Row, who certainly would have benefitted from a more integrated ASU campus that served as a conduit between the energy of CityScape/Luhrs and Roosevelt/south Midtown. We've watched block after block (not lot... entire BLOCKS) destroyed by mega projects that utilize an inward-facing design approach, yet ASU will be breaking ground on yet another one by end of year. Garages have severed the string of continuous commerce, and yet we're filling WVB - zoned for large scale retail and our last corridor with height allowance - with one on almost every corner.
Mix of Residential, Commercial, Retail, etc.
Leo - I think the issue with Phoenix has been that each mayor, each council, each generation has had different theories on how to execute the exact same solutions to the exact same problems. We've simply continued to chase the beast of decay without a holistic outlook on where we want to end up, and that's resulted in a patchwork that mixes residential within commercial corridors, malls in urban centers, parks on prime real estate... there is no dedicated financial district; entertainment district; arts district; residential neighborhoods. And, many would be envious of this strategy if it were indeed strategic and not accidental. Look at Midtown. What was once envisioned to be a Wilshire Blvd commercial corridor was rebranded as a Museum/Arts District, and now that office vacancies are reaching a point of desperation, we're now seeing an influx of residential proposals. But, what we need are tall, dense, mixed use proposals to make up for the fact that Midtown was a commercial center for decades. 4-5 stories of a generic template won't have any net impact on downtown, and will only hinder efforts made further south.
Future of the Urban Villages
Portland on the Park is the only development I've seen with the potential to have impact to the point where more development follows, grocers come into play, clothing stores pop up, etc. Filling those towers with that demographic is a perfect kickstart. But, we're on the same page that it's Roosevelt, Garfield, and the Southern districts that need unique, tailored strategies for how they will feed into the downtown ecosystem. Senior housing and luxury condos isn't a great mix, either. Middle class, creative classes, families... they need to feel safe living and experiencing downtown for it to prosper, as well.
ASU - Example of Urban Campus Done Right
When I see this, I'm able to sleep knowing I'm not completely insane. This is the kind of development that should have been occurring on each of the ASU properties downtown. This is how you turn students into residents, professors into downtown employees, academic infrastructure into publically accessible, urban destinations. Is this perfect, either? No. It has a food court - enough said. But, this is how the public-private integration was supposed to benefit the city and ASU mutually.
http://www.usquaremadison.com/about/