HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5981  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2017, 2:05 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,089
My favourite scale is mixed density of low and mid rises with 1/2 of land area occupied by houses of 2-4 stories, small apartment buildings of 3-6 stories being 1/4 and larger apartment buildings of 6-20 stories occupying 1/4. The one thing I demand is that there's decent street interaction with the frontages not too far back from the sidewalk, with some areas built to the street and others set back no more than 2-3m. I'm definitely frustrated by many Canadian cities' "missing middle" problem, but large expanses of uniform scale don't do it for me either.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #5983  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2017, 2:59 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Canada has almost no fine-grained, medium-density, mixed-used neighbourhoods. Toronto is growing a lot, but few new neighbourhoods of that style are being built there because land prices are too high and development is too tightly regulated (the developers tend to be bigger companies and there are high fixed startup costs so larger projects are more attractive). For the most part it's highrise or nothing and the building footprints tend to be large.

It's too bad because I think there is a lot more demand for these neighbourhoods than there is supply. It would be nice if new cities could be built like this, or if some areas along the fringes of inner cities could be upgraded to this form. Without so much distortionary regulation I think it would happen naturally, and space in urban cores would probably become cheaper.
Planning in Toronto comes up with midrise neighbourhoods only to have developers re-imagine them as high rises. This hints of too loose regulations. Land prices are pretty much based on buildable density. That a building site can be easily rezone from mid rise to a skyscraper is what makes things expensive and closes the door to non institutional investor backed developers to purchase.
     
     
  #5984  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2017, 3:10 AM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by kool maudit View Post
I have had this same fantasy! Even picked a spot in Griffintown that's probably full now.

(Got a few ideas on how to scale traditional Montreal triplex architecture up to six storeys too. But this is just Triplettes de Belleville-style thought doodling...)

We should Kickstarter something like this.
I'm thinking it would be best to do the basements/foundations for the entire block on both sides, including water/drainage hookups. There would have to be some kind of initial engineer-approved agreement about how to treat bordering walls that touch each other.

And it would have to be brick. All brick. Save for the street-level commercial facades, which would be anything goes.

But what about heights? Should there be a limit? You'd have to be a bit sensitive to the surroundings. I think you can't really go wrong with three stories with 12-foot ceilings in North America, but maybe that that should be four or five stories?

If we really had control over a little neighbourhood, I'd want the streets to be London-sized. Maybe something like this: https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Denmark...1c64566ffc!8m2!3d51.5153348!4d-0.1293071. But with larger sidewalks, and just one one-way lane of through traffic with a second lane of parking.

There's a whole empty square block in Hamilton next to downtown where I fantasize doing this: https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.2580322,-...3Ze0DdX5RmPsUVAi5C2uw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656. Maybe do a diagonal street through that block, or even four triangular quadrants meeting a roundabout with fountain in the middle.
     
     
  #5985  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2017, 6:56 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,931
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #5986  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 2:30 AM
GeneralLea's Avatar
GeneralLea GeneralLea is online now
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,952
That's a beautiful photo....wow.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
     
     
  #5987  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 6:39 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,340
Fantastic Edmonton shot indeed !
Love to see cranes in the skyline - so exciting knowing what they are building.
Hope Aldrit gets built to balance out Stantec.
     
     
  #5988  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 7:29 AM
Monolith's Avatar
Monolith Monolith is offline
Pacific Breeze
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southwestern British Columbia
Posts: 1,232
     
     
  #5989  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2017, 10:41 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,931
A little Blade Runner zoom for Edmonton.


www.twitter.com/wherezjeff
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #5990  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2017, 4:58 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,931
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #5991  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2017, 5:21 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
     
     
  #5992  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 12:04 AM
q12's Avatar
q12 q12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 5,128
     
     
  #5993  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 2:29 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,918
Halifax, one of my favourite Canadian city.
Je t'aime!
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #5994  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 2:32 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by q12 View Post
.
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #5995  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 2:42 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,638
Montreal's construction boom has been so satisfying. It's done wonders for the downtown visually.
     
     
  #5996  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 4:58 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,340
That last Halifax shot is spectacular !!

Looks like a city that should have a CFL team.
     
     
  #5997  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 5:45 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,050
I'm giddy with excitement just thinking about a Halifax team.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #5998  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 1:22 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,641
I'm liking Halifax too, but the tabletop effect is slowly getting worse.

Something taller needs to break through and stand out...
     
     
  #5999  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 2:07 PM
le calmar's Avatar
le calmar le calmar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 5,240
Agreed but in order for Halifax to get a CFL team they will need a new highrise to break the tabletop effect. They are already so close though, but the league is still not entirely satisfied with the skyline.

Last edited by le calmar; Nov 26, 2017 at 4:56 PM.
     
     
  #6000  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2017, 3:23 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,918
Hello guys, soon I am going to publish a video of Yonge St., Downtown Toronto between the 401 and the Gardiner Expressway. I would like to add some informations below in my video. Does anybody know how Toronto is ranked in North America for the number of Skyscrapers under construction at the same time ? And how many of them are over 200 or 250 meters tall ?
Thanks !
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.