Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nick1982
Renaming Airport Boulevard to something as aggrandizing and egostistical as 'Mike Dow Avenue' is just asinine. That thoroughfare has an inherent prestige and value unparalled by any artery in South Alabama or possibly the central Gulf Coast. Renaming it would be akin to renaming Peachtree Street as Shirley Franklin Avenue or US 280 to something equally gaudy.
By the way, 'west Mobile' pertains to any location west of I-65, whether it is located in Mobile's city limits or not. "Panera Bread opened its second west Mobile location on Schillinger Road not too far from Starbucks."
|
You're wrong, and you're not going to convince me otherwise, so we just need to drop the issue
More importantly though, the Port Authority approved the 60-20 split which could clear the way for the docks expansion, despite the attempts of John Rogers
More From The Mobile Register | Subscribe To The Mobile Register
Board OKs split for docks funding
Resolution worded to ensure state money goes into construction projects
Wednesday, March 23, 2005
Staff Report
The Alabama State Port Authority on Tuesday passed a resolution pledging to abide by a negotiated "60-20 split" that could pave the way for $80 million in state money to help build a new container terminal.
The board agreed to limit any request for money from the state's Capital Improvements Trust Fund to no more than $60 million before Nov. 1, 2006. That would mean the last $20 million in state money pledged to a $300 million-plus container port at Mobile's state docks would not be available until the fall of 2006 -- as part of the state's 2007 budget.
Advertisement
The resolution was also worded to ensure that the state money went into construction projects, said docks Director Jimmy Lyons.
The long-promised docks funding is a remnant of Amendment 666 to the state constitution. The docks was mentioned as an intended recipient of economic development money, though the amendment specified no dollar amount.
State officials originally promised $100 million, delivering $20 million through bond proceeds in 2003, with the rest to come from additional bond sales. But Gov. Bob Riley earlier this year pushed the docks to seek the money via a direct appropriation.
The request has encountered resistance, particularly from Birmingham-area lawmakers who want $150 million in state money to support a domed stadium project in Jefferson County.
The proposed "60-20 split" of the $80 million is necessary under the General Fund budget proposal engineered by Rep. John Knight, D-Montgomery. Knight's plan depends on shifting some money out of the Capital Improvement Trust Fund to cover other 2006 spending.
The legislation has passed the House and is in the Senate General Fund committee. Sen. Roger Bedford, the Russellville Democrat who chairs the appropriating panel, held a brief public hearing on the matter last week but delayed further consideration in reaction to protests from Jefferson County lawmakers.
The Birmingham-area senators made the same complaints their House colleagues offered when they tried to block the bill in the lower chamber. They claim the state has not invested enough in the development of the state's most populous city and its surrounding communities.
Bedford, who has committed to the docks funding but not to a specific source for the money, said he plans to bring up the measure again at his committee's next meeting, which has yet to be scheduled. The Legislature is on break this week and is slated to reconvene March 29.
Lyons said he could not predict whether the port authority's action would guarantee smooth sailing for the docks appropriation.
"I hope so, but I don't want to ever get too confident about anything," said Lyons. "We're trying to cover every base we can, and we've got a huge cadre of supporters around the state who are rooting for us and making calls for us.
"I've not talked to a soul who is opposed to what we are doing."
South of the main docks complex, the Choctaw Point container terminal and rail yard should be able to handle nearly 14 times more container cargo than the docks' existing container port. The project, which could take five to six years to complete, recently received needed federal permits.
The state docks is seeking a private investor partner in the project.
http://www.al.com/business/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/business/1111592759195530.xml