HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 6:38 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,599
For some reason I can't download the whole document. Could one of you post the renderings if you have the time?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 7:46 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116







Last edited by PacificNW; Jan 10, 2007 at 1:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 12:18 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,599
Thanks. I agree, even in this initial rendering the design looks like it is going to be compelling.

Looking at the site in the photo below from Portlandmaps, I'm guessing that the existing building on the southern half of the lot is staying. The tower apparently will be on the NE corner... I didn't realize how close it will be to ZGF. You can see a corner of that site in this photo, plus the parking lot on the Crystal block that is slated for development. Cool. Now all we need is to cover 405!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 12:41 AM
Dougall5505's Avatar
Dougall5505 Dougall5505 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 1,976
its going to be awesome to drive by on the 405 and watch it rise
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 2:02 AM
sirsimon sirsimon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nowhere...now here
Posts: 355
Ooooh...me likey. Thank god it is slender and has some curvature.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 2:12 AM
der Reisender's Avatar
der Reisender der Reisender is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: PDX
Posts: 471
looks like the architects in town are finally starting to think outside the 'box' (bad pun intended)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 3:11 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,791
and it's LRS, no less!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 9:33 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,480
Maybe they finally hired a designer?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 9:44 PM
mcbaby mcbaby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 587
would be cooler if it had a spire. then it would truly be the "manhattan" but it's exciting all the same.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2007, 10:19 PM
Bender13's Avatar
Bender13 Bender13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 192
From the 2D renderings it sort of looks similar to the Benson Tower, which IMO is a great tower. But the 3D rendering shows those curves, and it's even better. I love it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 12:04 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is online now
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,843
would be nice to see this start a trend for apartment towers on that side of the 405. Goose Hollow should be much more dense than what it really is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 12:06 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,533
Quote:
Goose Hollow should be much more dense than what it really is.
I think Goose Hollow will be much more dense than it is in the next 5 years...the Allegro's a go, the Jefferson is under way, the Civic is almost finished, and now the Manhattan...lots of possibilities for the area, and the neighborhood doesn't seem sick with NIMBYISM.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 12:24 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is online now
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,843
the current residents are too poor to be NIMBYs would be my guess. Or better example would be buildings like Civic tend to attracted the YIMBYs. Either way, cool to see new things going on over there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:44 AM
robbobpdx robbobpdx is offline
inside + out
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 113
I agree the Manhattan Tower (from the renderings, at least) will be an exciting and welcome addition to the Goose Hollow area, and as others have stated several more are planned or underway (Civic, Allegro).

One thing that is a bit hard to get past, though, is the rather unfortunate location for what appears to be such a spectacular building. Because of the way I-405 turns right in that area it almost looks like it wraps around the block a bit. I've often wondered about he several buildings in the Pearl that border I-405. I know some of the older ones do hear the traffic noise quite a bit. Of course, I'm sure the Manhattan Tower will probably have good sound insulation. And unless they cover 405 and build a tall building in front of it, there will be killer views looking East.

Wish we could get more condo buildings like this in the West End. Maybe that will come eventually, but I guess that is one thing I would wish for this building -- that it were built somewhere a bit more central (on Broadway, or next to the Galleria, or something like that).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:00 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,791
Re: noise. There's that little five-story building on 16th and Alder, right on the curve of 405. I read, years ago, when it was built, that the developer was very concerned about noise and ended up using triple-paned windows, at least on the freeway side. IIRC, residents interviewed for the article said they barely heard the freeway. So I imagine it won't be much of a problem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:05 AM
pdxstreetcar's Avatar
pdxstreetcar pdxstreetcar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,300
I also agree that this looks like a great tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 1:52 PM
edgepdx's Avatar
edgepdx edgepdx is offline
No longer PDX
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hood River, OR
Posts: 465
Very nice! If they use a quality skin it should be a showpiece.

It looks like they are tying it into the building next door with the parking garage. If I recall correctly that a really ugly 60's office building with a big rose painted on it? I wonder if they're going to remodel that building at the same time?
__________________
Brawndo - The Thirst Mutilator
"It's got what plants crave!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 4:40 PM
PDX City-State PDX City-State is offline
Well designed mixed use
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: under the Burnside Bridge
Posts: 1,589
I live two blocks from this site. I really like the Goose Hollow Area, but it's curiously lacking in street activity for a very nice looking neighborhoold a stone's throw from downtown. I saw a well-known real estate consultant (whom I used to work for) taking pictures of the Commodore Building a couple of weeks ago. The Commodore won't like be going anywhere, but the block also includes a surface-parking lot that's totally empty, and 20,000sf one-story building used to house classic cars. It seems ripe for redevelopment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 5:28 PM
Eagle rock Eagle rock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 119
The main reason that neighborhood has not taken off and maybe even why it has taken the West End so long to take off is because of the 405. I really think capping 405 should be a priority, more so even then moving I 5 off the river. I don’t know anything about engineering but it seems it would not be too difficult to cap it, at least around where the Manhattan is going in. I am sure you could even get developers to pay for some of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2007, 6:10 PM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is online now
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,843
yeah, I am all for capping. The 405 is already below street level, capping just makes sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:54 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.