HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2015, 8:29 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
Nice!

Now they just need to tear down the PriceWaterhouse Building
and replace it with another tower with a tall lobby area to create a sightline to the CP Station
(maybe that's the eventual plan?)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2015, 9:11 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Nice!

Now they just need to tear down the PriceWaterhouse Building
and replace it with another tower with a tall lobby area to create a sightline to the CP Station
(maybe that's the eventual plan?)
The proforma for such a scheme would involve assumptions that can only be defined, shall we say, as being in the realm of unicorns.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2015, 9:21 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Nice!

Now they just need to tear down the PriceWaterhouse Building
and replace it with another tower with a tall lobby area to create a sightline to the CP Station
(maybe that's the eventual plan?)
And while we're at it, lets have Harbour Centre trim a wedge from their N.W. corner to reveal even more of the CPR station too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2015, 9:48 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,381
Maybe he meant the grant Thornton tower
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2015, 9:52 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Maybe he meant the grant Thornton tower
Which one is that, please? Do you have the address? I can find it on Google that way (and the Web, of course). Thank you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2015, 10:11 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
Yes, the Grant Thornton Tower. It was originally called the Price Waterhouse Building (before merger with Coopers Lybrand to form PriceWaterhouseCoopers).

Last edited by officedweller; Sep 4, 2015 at 10:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2015, 10:14 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Yes, the Grant Thortnon Tower. It was originally called the Price Waterhouse Building (before merger with Coopers Lybrand to form PriceWaterhouseCoopers).
And it has sort of an open domed "garden? Smallish; dark glass and stainless steel trimming, a bit sci-fi perhaps as a building?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2015, 10:29 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
And it has sort of an open domed "garden? Smallish; dark glass and stainless steel trimming, a bit sci-fi perhaps as a building?
The dome on the roof of the tower was supposed to light up as a beacon, but the City nixed that idea.
The building was very sci-fi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2015, 9:55 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
The dome on the roof of the tower was supposed to light up as a beacon, but the City nixed that idea.
The building was very sci-fi.
I seem to be one of the few who likes the PWC Grant T. building. I'll admit it was dated by the time it was built, it's still a neat building. The 80's did not reap many good pieces of architecture for this city, it's one of the better. I do wish they built it about twice as big as it is now, its gonna be dwarfed once this sharp new tower is its neighbor. I am glad to see the underutilized plaza gone, it was dingy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2015, 10:12 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,044
^ Try google, it's surprisingly effective.

And ya that would make more sense, must have been what he meant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2015, 12:45 AM
Bcasey25raptor's Avatar
Bcasey25raptor Bcasey25raptor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver Suburbs
Posts: 2,852
This building looks amazing. Build it.
__________________
River District Big Government progressive
~ Just Watch me
- Pierre Elliot Trudeau
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2015, 5:48 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bcasey25raptor View Post
This building looks amazing. Build it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2015, 6:50 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I don't mind it at all. Everyone complains about variety, and even though the style is 'cheesy' to most people, it was well pulled off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2015, 8:38 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I don't mind it at all. Everyone complains about variety, and even though the style is 'cheesy' to most people, it was well pulled off.
What does "cheesy" mean, in the design context? I know it's kind of pejorative, and I hear it often mentioned on SSP Vancouver, but not sure precisely. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2015, 9:43 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,381
Tacky, cheap
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 2:20 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,867
-trying too hard
-unsubtle
-inauthentic

There are various offerings of definitions of cheesy on Urban Dictionary but I found this one the most interesting as it gets into the etymology of the word.


cheesy

Low quality, cheap, inauthentic, crappy; fake. From cheese cloth, the thin cheap fabric used to drain cheese curd, and in the past sometimes used instead for proper cloth in cheap clothing.
(While feeling the fabric of a shirt on the rack) "This one feels a little cheesy." Hence any low-grade or fake product, tangible or not, offered to the public.

by TedC on Urban Dictionary
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 1:04 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,026
cheesy ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thank you both for your assistance. (I wonder what the 'cheesiest' designs in Vancouver would be)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 3:01 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
It would be outside the scope of this thread!

I love how this project will have as much plaza space as before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2015, 5:00 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
It would be outside the scope of this thread!

I love how this project will have as much plaza space as before.
Good reasoning about the scope of the thread!

Yes, I think 601 is worth going for, too. Have the negotiations been completed? Is there a tentative start date, or not?
The Hastings "canyon," though not too tall, needs to be enhanced, IMO, and 601 will be a cornerstone of that.

(I'd love to see the other half of that old Royal Bank tower added! Too bad the space is occupied....)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2015, 5:50 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,696
Hearing that demo work will begin on this one early in the new year and it will be full-steam ahead from there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.