HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 2:37 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,403
A tower taller than the Austonian, directly adjacent to I-35, mid-block. Austin's crazy now.
__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 2:48 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echostatic View Post
A tower taller than the Austonian, directly adjacent to I-35, mid-block. Austin's crazy now.
Crammed in like an afterthought, TBH. Keeerazy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 7:16 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,564
What's crazy is I hadn't even considered this with respect to the Austonian or the Independent. We've seen such insane height jumps in recent years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 7:26 PM
myBrain myBrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 698
Taller than Indy and Austonian, but markedly less interesting architecturally. Not that it's a bad tower, it's handsome and I like the dark accents, but it's basically in the same mold as 44E and the Modern. So our filler-type towers have now begun to surpass the height of our signature towers from 4 years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 7:57 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by myBrain View Post
Taller than Indy and Austonian, but markedly less interesting architecturally. Not that it's a bad tower, it's handsome and I like the dark accents, but it's basically in the same mold as 44E and the Modern. So our filler-type towers have now begun to surpass the height of our signature towers from 4 years ago.
Austonian = 683'
62 East = 684'
Independent = 690'

I think this one will be far more interesting looking once built. It may be the skinniest skyscraper (in both length and width) in Austin over 400' tall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 8:11 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,288
Here's a screen grab from the DC meeting showing the new height. The top floors with the best views have much higher ceilings.

__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 8:40 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSAT View Post
Austonian = 683'
62 East = 684'
Independent = 690'

I think this one will be far more interesting looking once built. It may be the skinniest skyscraper (in both length and width) in Austin over 400' tall.
Honestly I've been wondering if it will have a feel similar to Hyatt Centric -- since the lot is deep but skinny, it might produce that sort of a slablike look.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 8:45 PM
jake.robs's Avatar
jake.robs jake.robs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
Honestly I've been wondering if it will have a feel similar to Hyatt Centric -- since the lot is deep but skinny, it might produce that sort of a slablike look.
Possibly, but I don't think it will be quite as striking, due to 700 River being another slab literally right next to it.
__________________
Building a scale model of Downtown Austin, TX out of paper: TableTopMetropolis Instagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 8:50 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
Honestly I've been wondering if it will have a feel similar to Hyatt Centric -- since the lot is deep but skinny, it might produce that sort of a slablike look.
Is the lot really that deep? This project doesn't go all the way through to Rainey, correct? If so, I guess it would have a Rainey address instead of East Ave.

Anyway, I think this is a half block deep (for the Rainey area and not CBD). So, it should still be not too wide.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 9:34 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSAT View Post
Is the lot really that deep? This project doesn't go all the way through to Rainey, correct? If so, I guess it would have a Rainey address instead of East Ave.

Anyway, I think this is a half block deep (for the Rainey area and not CBD). So, it should still be not too wide.
Both are single lot projects, and they are both half a block in depth. The Centric block also has an alley, just like this one in Rainey does. I mean, it won't be apples to apples, but it'll be similar.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2023, 9:35 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,288
For clarification, the lot stops at the alley. So it's 1/2 the width of 700 River.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 8:34 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,338
They added the pdf to the design commission's website. The elevations show it as 623 feet still, and we got another rendering showing it here.

https://services.austintexas.gov/edi....cfm?id=404940
__________________
Nevermore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 8:42 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Anchorage-Austin-Anchorage-Austin and so forth...
Posts: 1,355
Page 10 says 625.5’ and on the elevations there is some kind of slanted thing just barely above the top line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 9:32 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,288
That backup file doesn't have the latest info - the elevations show the previous 53-story version. The new elevations have not been made public. This is from the meeting. Four floors were added which increased the height to 684'.

__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 11:31 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,338
Yeah, I should have mentioned that. I was mostly interested in the north/south rendering that showed the setback, which I hadn't seen before.
__________________
Nevermore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2023, 4:37 PM
myBrain myBrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 698




That's a lot of concrete on the southern facade. I know that the River Street tower will block much of it, but there will still be some poking out above. I wish they'd clad it with the black paneling used on the other facades.

The western face surprises me most -- half of the top portion is covered in metal panelling. You'd think the western side would have the best views of the river and downtown. This tower is clearly oriented towards the east and north, which makes sense give its close neighbors, but is definitely different from most of the other buildings here, which put a premium on western and southern views.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2023, 4:40 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,403
They're probably focusing on eastern views over western because the lot west of the tower could be developed one day, while the lot east of the tower is a freeway soon to be trenched.
__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2023, 5:26 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,780
One entire façade of the tower was going to be sacrificed anyway. It's so thin that the stairwell and elevator shafts will be designed to run up and down one side of the tower versus in its core.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2023, 6:00 PM
jake.robs's Avatar
jake.robs jake.robs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 201
This kind of thin and tall tower is giving me Melbourne vibes but without the interesting facade.
__________________
Building a scale model of Downtown Austin, TX out of paper: TableTopMetropolis Instagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2023, 2:07 AM
agsatx88 agsatx88 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 287
Can you believe this site was originally envisioned as a 3 story hotel?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.