HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2016, 7:16 AM
Admiral Nelson Admiral Nelson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 499
Another excellent article from the Hill Times. It helps explain the portrait gallery idea.

Portrait-gallery plan popular as government consults on fate of old U.S. embassy

PSPC is looking for a public use for the building and put forward six options at an Aug. 18 public town hall meeting where a majority endorsed a national portrait gallery plan.


By LAURA RYCKEWAERT

PUBLISHED : Monday, Aug. 22, 2016 12:00 AM

A consensus seems to be building around the idea of resurrecting a plan to turn the old U.S. embassy at 100 Wellington St. in Ottawa into a national portrait gallery.

“The portrait gallery was a very good plan, Canada needs a national portrait gallery,” said David Jeane, president of Heritage Ottawa. “Canada has a huge collection of portraits [in archives] … but generally this is a huge resource of Canadian history that the public never sees.”

The building has sat vacant for almost two decades and a previous Liberal plan to turn it into a national portrait gallery was scrapped under the Harper Conservatives in 2006. There was briefly talk of instead putting a portrait gallery in Calgary, but that never came to fruition.

Since then, it’s cost an average of $200,000 each year to maintain the structure, including costs for “small repairs” to the roof to prevent water damage, masonry assessments, and heating “to prevent deterioration,” Rob Wright, an assistant deputy minister with Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC), said in an interview Aug. 17.

While a plan has yet to be determined, the government is intent on creating a public use for the building.

At a public town hall held Aug. 18, PSPC put forward its six proposals for the space: a “Canada House” venue; a capital information centre; an artwork gallery (it doesn’t specify for portraits); an indigenous cultural facility; an interpretive centre for Parliament; and an artefact museum.

Around 100 people showed up for the town hall, and of the 12 who got a chance to speak, all but two spoke in favour of resurrecting the old national portrait gallery plan. A former architect and a director general of the portrait gallery plan, as well as former Liberal Senator Jerry Graftstein, were among those who endorsed the idea, as did an Ottawa-based group, with a member from Kingston, Ont. who spoke, armed with pamphlets.

Before the town hall, more than 500 people took a tour of the building during a two-hour open house. PSPC is also running an online consultation survey, giving people a chance to comment on proposed plans or suggest their own, until Sept. 9. Surveys will also be handed out to people visiting Parliament Hill.

“There will be a bit of an analysis of the results, and then those results will be made pubic in the coming months,” said Mr. Wright, adding that such consultations are being sought because the space will be for “public use and we feel that Canadians should help define how to use it publicly.”

No timeline has been indicated for announcing a new plan, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that Canada’s 150th birthday is coming up next year and various other project announcements are slated for then

In an emailed response to questions from The Hill Times on Aug. 18, Public Services Minister Judy Foote (Bonavista-Burin-Trinity, N.L.) said she was “pleased” there was an “opportunity to consult Canadians” on how to use “this significant heritage building,” which she called an “architectural gem.”

While the decision ultimately lies with the federal government (subject to National Capital Commission approval), “consultation will shape and influence the decisions,” said Ms. Foote.

She said she’s been “very impressed” by the work completed to the former Bank of Montreal building, now known as the Sir John A. Macdonald Building, as well as on the nearby Wellington Building.

Getting action on the empty 100 Wellington St. building was a campaign commitment from Ottawa Centre, Ont. Liberal MP Catherine McKenna, now environment minister, and last week she told The Hill Times in an interview she’s “really excited” public consultations have now been launched.

Ms. McKenna said she and Ms. Foote began discussing what to do with 100 Wellington St. shortly after the election last October.

“It’s an amazing building in an amazing location, and I just said, ‘Look, this is a huge opportunity to showcase great public space,’ ” she said said, adding it was something the government was already looking into as part of wider, ongoing work to rehabilitate Parliament Hill.

“Certainly I heard a lot of interest [from constituents during the 2015 election] in the portrait gallery,” Ms. McKenna said, adding that there’s “a lot of support” for using the building for this purpose.

“There are a number of groups that have been talking about a portrait gallery, but I’m more interested in just making sure that we hear from residents of Ottawa Centre and all across Canada about how we make the best use of this amazing public.”

Ms. McKenna said it’s a “shame” the space has been empty for almost two decades, and thinks “we can bring Canadians together around this, especially as we head into our 150th” anniversary of Confederation.

Former Ottawa Centre NDP MP Paul Dewar said the government “should look seriously at the portrait gallery” option.

“It would be important to have something along those lines right across from Parliament,” he said.

Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson, who spoke at the town hall last week, said he has two preferred plans for the building: either a national portrait gallery, or a museum for Canadian keepsakes.

He said he’s been a “dog with a bone” for years over getting action on the building, and under the previous Conservative government wasn’t even able to get a tour of the vacant space.

The old U.S. embassy was completed in 1932 and designed by renowned American architect Cass Gilbert, who also designed the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. and the Woolworth building in New York City, among other works. Three smaller buildings from the late 1800s that were part of Ottawa’s old bankers’ row along Wellington Street were demolished to build the embassy, which originally sat beside the former Rideau Club building on the corner of Metcalfe and Wellington streets, until that building burned down in 1979.

“It’s part of the history of Canada becoming a nation,” said Mr. Jeane, who toured the building on Aug. 18.

“Until 1931, Canada could not have embassies from foreign nations. When the [original] U.S. embassy was planned, it was only going to be a legation, not an embassy. But it was only because of the Statue of Westminster political change in 1931 that Canada was actually able to have its own foreign policy independent of Great Britain,” he said, highlighting it was the first foreign embassy in Canada, and, along with Paris and Tokyo, was one of the first built by the U.S. government.

The three-storey building at 100 Wellington St. is a high renaissance style building, which in and of itself makes it unique among Ottawa architecture, featuring Vermont marble on its bottom floor and lining an arched stairwell leading up to the higher-ceilinged second-storey. The former ambassador’s office is on the second floor and is lined with a Canadian knotty pine panelling, featuring a marble fireplace and large floor-to-ceiling windows that look out onto Parliament Hill, offering an unobstructed view of Centre Block and its Peace Tower. Surrounding these spaces are smaller offshoot offices, with a smaller staircase leading to the third-floor.

The Americans outgrew the space and expanded into nearby offices, prompting a search for a new home. In 1998, 100 Wellington St. was emptied as the U.S. Embassy was moved to Sussex Drive, where it remains today.

In 2001, the Chrétien Liberal government approved and set in motion a plan to turn the classified heritage building into a national portrait gallery. A total of $6.4-million was spent on this initiative—with engineering and architectural plans drawn up, and demolition and hazardous material removal work (including asbestos abatement) completed, the latter at a cost of roughly $800,000—before plans were scrapped in 2006 when the Harper Conservatives came into power.

With that “deconstruction phase” of work already complete, Mr. Wright said, “what we have is a building that’s ready to go forward.”

Former Liberal public works minister Don Boudria, who oversaw the department as minister in 2002, told The Hill Times he’s keeping his “fingers crossed” the building will be turned into a national portrait gallery.

“Right across the street from the Parliament buildings, what better spot to have a portrait museum,” said Mr. Boudria. “Only a small sampling of them are exposed now, and they all would have been in the one place.”

Mr. Boudria said the previous Conservative government scrapped the idea in 2006 because of new “priorities.”

“Its priorities were generally showing the rest of Canada that Ottawa was spoiled and didn’t deserve to have new stuff,” he said.

Mr. Boudria, speaking the day before Liberal MP Mauril Bélanger passed away following a battle with ALS, said the late MP was an early “champion” of the idea of turning 100 Wellington St. into Canada’s national portrait gallery.

Mr. Bélanger, who had represented Ottawa-Vanier, Ont., since 1995, passed away late Aug. 15, with news not breaking until a day later. Early on Aug. 16, Mr. Bélanger’s office had responded via email to questions from The Hill Times.

“Mr. Bélanger believes that in order to showcase Canada’s rich diversity and history through portraits, one would need a central location in our capital city, such as this heritage building,” aide Danick LaFrance said in the email, adding Mr. Bélanger applauded the government “for its leadership towards finding a suitable use for this heritage building.”

For the last five years The Hill Times has asked, PSPC had indicated it was “exploring options” for the building. Last week, Mr. Wright said with 21 projects completed since 2006 and work on the West Block and Government Conference Centre soon to finish, it’s now time to “pivot and focus” on the three blocks along Wellington Street facing Parliament Hill.

Library and Archives Canada has a massive collection of historic artwork stored in its preservation centre in Gatineau, Que., of which portraits make up a “significant portion,” including 20,000 drawings, paintings, and prints; four million photographs; and “several thousand caricatures,” among other things, explained Library and Archives media relations head Richard Provencher.

“The collection includes portraits of ordinary Canadians, who helped build this country, and aims to represent Canada’s diverse regions and peoples,” he explained in an email response last week.

It’s a collection Library and Archives has been gathering and preserving since 1872, in an effort to document “historical personalities important to Canada’s development.” Among the portraits currently in storage is a “Four Indian Kings” collection of oil-on-canvas portraits from roughly 1710 of Aboriginal diplomats, “painted some 300 years ago by John Verelst during a historic meeting in London between Aboriginal emissaries and Queen Anne.”

Occasionally, portraits in the collection (or sometimes reproductions) are used in travelling or other exhibits in Canada.

Just down the street from the old embassy, at 128 Wellington St., sits another relic of the old bankers’ row, which is also currently vacant and has been for years. Mr. Wright said once public consultations are complete and a use for 100 Wellington St. has been determined, it will inform “the broader planning exercise for the parliamentary precinct,” including what to do with the small heritage building at 128 Wellington St.

lryckewaert@hilltimes.com
The Hill Times
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2016, 1:06 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,679
More than 7,000 respond to survey on use of former U.S. embassy

Don Butler, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: September 16, 2016 | Last Updated: September 16, 2016 3:30 PM EDT




The federal government has heard from thousands of Canadians with views about the future use of the former U.S. embassy at 100 Wellington St.

More than 7,000 people responded to an online survey between Aug. 18 and Sept. 9, Public Services and Procurement Canada said Friday.

The survey asked them to choose from six potential public uses for the 84-year-old building, which has been vacant since 1998.

They include a gallery to house a collection of artwork of national significance; a museum; an indigenous cultural centre; a parliamentary interpretive centre; a capital information centre; and Canada House, which would showcase the best of the provinces and territories.

Survey respondents were also free to suggest their own ideas for use of the building, which occupies a prime location across from Parliament Hill.

At one point, the former embassy building was earmarked for use as a national portrait gallery. Those plans were abandoned by the former Conservative government, but support for the idea has endured.

In a news release, Public Services and Procurement said the response to the survey “indicates a strong interest in shaping the future of Parliament Hill.”

The survey results are still being compiled and analyzed, and will be made public in a consultation report to be released by the end of this year.

The report will then be used to develop recommended options for the use of the building, culminating in a final decision by the government, likely in 2017.

dbutler@postmedia.com
ButlerDon/twitter.com

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...er-u-s-embassy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2016, 6:07 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,679
Canadians divided by age on best use of former U.S. embassy

Don Butler, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: December 23, 2016 | Last Updated: December 23, 2016 10:47 PM EST


Canadians appear to be sharply divided along generational lines on the merits of using the former U.S. embassy building at 100 Wellington St. to house a new national portrait gallery.

A government public opinion survey, conducted from Aug. 18 to Sept. 9, shows strong support for a gallery among respondents 55 and older. But among those under 25, it ranks at or near the bottom of six potential uses for the old embassy.

The six options under consideration are Canada House — described as a venue “to bring all of Canada to the nation’s capital” — an art gallery, a museum, an indigenous cultural centre, a capital information centre and an interpretive centre for Parliament.

Done by Ekos Research Associates, the survey was conducted in two parts — a representative poll of 1,580 Canadians, with a margin of error of 2.4 percentage points 19 times out of 20, and an online survey open to anyone, which attracted more than 5,500 responses.

The results were strikingly different. In the representative survey, Canada House was the clear choice. Fully six in 10 liked that idea.

But among those who filled out the open survey, the most popular choice was an art gallery, favoured by 57 per cent. By contrast, just 38 per cent in the representative survey approved of that use.

Survey participants were also asked to rank their top three choices in order. In the open survey, one-third picked an art gallery as their No. 1 option — far more than the one-in-five who picked Canada House.

But only seven per cent of those in the representative survey named a gallery as their top choice — the least favoured of the six options, trailing even a capital information centre or an interpretive centre for Parliament.

In the open survey, eight in 10 of those 65 or older liked the idea of a gallery. By contrast, only one-third of those under 25 and half of those 25 to 54 said the same.

Moreover, seniors were three times likelier to rank a gallery as their first choice than those under 55. Younger Canadians much prefer the idea of using the old embassy as Canada House or as an indigenous cultural centre, the survey results show.

That apparent demographic divide doesn’t make sense to Lilly Koltun, who was director general of the National Portrait Gallery from 2001 to 2010, when it was under the wing of Library and Archives Canada.

“The National Portrait Gallery in London, which gets huge attendance, half of their attendance is under 35,” Koltun said in an interview.

Overall, the Ekos report says, Canada House “clearly has the widest appeal.” An art gallery is the second most popular choice, but support for it “is singularly concentrated among those 55 or older,” it says.

But Koltun thinks many who answered the survey were responding to the idea of a generic art gallery, rather than a portrait gallery specifically. “I really regret that they didn’t just ask, ‘Do you want to have a national portrait gallery?”

What survey respondents were hankering for was something about Canada, she said. “They wanted something that would help them and tourists and people visiting understand the country. That’s exactly what a national portrait gallery does. It gives you that history through the lives of real Canadians.”

The survey was one element of extensive public consultations in recent months on the future use of the Beaux-Arts embassy building, an 85-year-0ld heritage edifice that has been vacant since 1998.

Jean Chrétien’s government earmarked it for use as a national portrait gallery in 2001, but those plans were scrubbed by Stephen Harper’s Conservative government.

Koltun, now an artist herself, said few Canadians know that the country has a “fabulous” national portrait collection, almost all of it in storage. “It’s one of the best-kept art secrets of the country.”

Many people who answered the survey “would be happy with a national portrait gallery once they saw what it was,” she said.

The federal government is expected to announce the future use of the embassy building in 2017, as part of Canada’s 150th anniversary celebrations.

dbutler@postmedia.com
twitter.com/ButlerDon

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...er-u-s-embassy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2017, 12:53 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,679
Majority of Senate asks Trudeau for portrait gallery at 100 Wellington

Dylan C. Robertson
Published on: April 11, 2017 | Last Updated: April 11, 2017 6:03 PM EDT




More than half of Canada’s sitting senators have asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to create a National Portrait Gallery in the former U.S. embassy building that faces Parliament Hill.

In a letter released Tuesday, 55 of the 99 senators say they’d like to see 100 Wellington St. turned into a gallery like those in London, Washington and Canberra. The cross-party support came after four senators voiced support for the idea in the Red Chamber, including independent Sen. Doug Black.

“I think we should tell our story in the most prominent, visible, public location that we can, and it’s right at the centre of the national capital,” Black told the Citizen.

In the last three weeks, even as the Senate struggled through tense filibusters over government bills and accusations of hyper-partisanship, Black’s staff called each senator’s office, asking for support for the gallery proposal. As of Tuesday afternoon, the list includes 55 names, though Black said the number had gone up to 60 by the evening.

“Imagine getting 60 senators on the same page. It’s fabulous,” he said.

Two of the senators from Ottawa seemed split on the proposal, with Kim Pate included in the afternoon list, but not Vern White. Neither could be reached late Tuesday.

The letter says Library and National Archives Canada is sitting on “the second largest collection of portraits in the world” with more than 20,000 paintings.

Adorned with a Canada 150 logo, the letter from the senators says a national gallery “must reflect artistic works of all origins and cultures, indigenous as much as immigrant artists.”

The building on Wellington Street is owned by Public Services and Procurement Canada, which asked 7,000 Canadians online last fall how it should be used. The department narrowed down six ideas, including a gallery, museum and indigenous cultural centre. “An announcement on the future use of 100 Wellington is expected in 2017,” the department says online.

The senators’ letter said young people disproportionately visit similar American and British galleries, but the government’s polling found support for a gallery low among millennials, and high among those aged 55 or older.

Black admits the gallery is “far from a slam dunk,” but calls himself “an Alberta senator and an optimist.”

The building has been a federal heritage building in 1985. Jean Chrétien’s Liberal government slated it for a national portrait gallery in 2001, but prime minister Stephen Harper halted those plans shortly after taking office in 2006.

“I recognize that it’s an expensive undertaking. I understand that not everybody is in favour of creating a gallery,” Black said.

Neither Public Services and Procurement Canada nor the Prime Minister’s Office had an immediate response to the letter.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/politi...100-wellington
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2017, 2:34 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 994
Should have been open for Canada 150.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2017, 3:01 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 24,081
Fingers crossed, but I fear that this may languish until a second Trudeau term, if there is one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted May 25, 2017, 4:59 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,679
For Canada 150, let's build a national portrait gallery

Doug Black, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: May 25, 2017 | Last Updated: May 25, 2017 9:59 AM EDT


Action on creating a much-needed cultural institution is long overdue – the time has come for Canada to have its own national portrait gallery.

Since the 19th century, the National Archives of Canada has accumulated, and continues to accumulate, the world’s second-largest collection of portraits. These are portraits of Canadians from all walks of life and periods in our history. If they were put on display, they could tell a profound story about our nation through the people who have called this vast land home.

Many countries, including England, the United States and Australia, have permanent national portrait galleries that are prominently featured in their capital cities. Interestingly, young people make up the majority of attendees: in London and Washington, D.C., almost half are under the age of 35 years. These galleries are exciting, open to all, and are active participants in the life of their respective nations.

When we consider a national portrait gallery for Canada, the Archives’ collection should be its base. But this gallery could also be so much more – a vibrant place that not only shows the past and the present, but that can offer a glimpse into our future as well. It should reflect the artistic works of all origins and cultures that make up Canada today. It would put front and centre who we are, as well as the richness and depth of our diversity.

A national portrait gallery of Canada would support Canadian artists, enhance our collective knowledge and enshrine all aspects of portraiture. These works must not be lost to Canadians in vaults or closets in artists’ studios. They deserve to be accessible to audiences of today, and the future, generating pride, knowledge and debate.

To this end, in April, I teamed up with senators Serge Joyal, Patricia Bovey and Paul McIntyre to pen a letter of support for the creation of such a gallery. We also asked the rest of our Senate colleagues if they would consider lending their support and were overwhelmed when we received an additional 59 senators’ signatures.

Canada 150 is the perfect opportunity to get these portraits out of the vaults and in front of the eyes of Canadians. We call on Canadians to share their support for such an initiative. The time is now to cement the legacies of our heroes – creating excitement, honouring artists and our enriching national fabric.

Doug Black is a senator representing Alberta. He is a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce, as well as the Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources.

http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/col...rtrait-gallery
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 1:03 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,669
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 1:10 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 24,081
I wonder if this will include an addition to the structure?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 1:17 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
Not the worst idea but why consult if we almost routinely ignore the results.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 1:20 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
Not the worst idea but why consult if we almost routinely ignore the results.
Create jobs for party-friendly consultants?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 1:38 PM
Mikeed Mikeed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 348
This is the decision that results in the greatest nation-building. The top 3 ideas are all valid and should be long-term goals to accomplish in Ottawa.

But Ottawa has long lacked any official presence for our Aboriginal heritage. Canada is fundamentally a history of over 400 years of partnership between the Aboriginal, English and French spheres. We are only multicultural *now* because of this heritage.

This is a significant step forward in dealing with one of the most significant national challenges for our time- the foundational years of the 21st Century- and that's Reconciliation.
__________________
Long time reader.
Seldom post.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 2:06 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 24,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeed View Post
This is the decision that results in the greatest nation-building. The top 3 ideas are all valid and should be long-term goals to accomplish in Ottawa.

But Ottawa has long lacked any official presence for our Aboriginal heritage. Canada is fundamentally a history of over 400 years of partnership between the Aboriginal, English and French spheres. We are only multicultural *now* because of this heritage.

This is a significant step forward in dealing with one of the most significant national challenges for our time- the foundational years of the 21st Century- and that's Reconciliation.
Yes, I think we all get the political symbolism. I do look forward to seeing more detailed plans (in due course). At the moment, the building in no way says "First Nations" and it will be interesting to see how/whether that is addressed architecturally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 2:18 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeed View Post
This is the decision that results in the greatest nation-building. The top 3 ideas are all valid and should be long-term goals to accomplish in Ottawa.

But Ottawa has long lacked any official presence for our Aboriginal heritage. Canada is fundamentally a history of over 400 years of partnership between the Aboriginal, English and French spheres. We are only multicultural *now* because of this heritage.

This is a significant step forward in dealing with one of the most significant national challenges for our time- the foundational years of the 21st Century- and that's Reconciliation.
I think this is an outdated view of Canada. This founding myth no longer reflects current realities. How many people in Toronto or Vancouver for example have no French, English or Aboriginal heritage. Probably well over half even 2/3 or our largest city.

As for no Aboriginal presence. The museum of history is dominated by the Aboriginal section. I don't disagree more can be done, but the size and architecture of this building doesn't seem like an obvious fit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 2:35 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeed View Post
This is the decision that results in the greatest nation-building. The top 3 ideas are all valid and should be long-term goals to accomplish in Ottawa.

But Ottawa has long lacked any official presence for our Aboriginal heritage. Canada is fundamentally a history of over 400 years of partnership between the Aboriginal, English and French spheres. We are only multicultural *now* because of this heritage.

This is a significant step forward in dealing with one of the most significant national challenges for our time- the foundational years of the 21st Century- and that's Reconciliation.
Canada could really use its own version of the U.S. American Indian Museum (though maybe with a much different name.)
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 3:11 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 24,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
I think this is an outdated view of Canada. This founding myth no longer reflects current realities. How many people in Toronto or Vancouver for example have no French, English or Aboriginal heritage. Probably well over half even 2/3 or our largest city.

As for no Aboriginal presence. The museum of history is dominated by the Aboriginal section. I don't disagree more can be done, but the size and architecture of this building doesn't seem like an obvious fit.
Seems to me that you're confusing founding myth with multicultural myth. They co-exist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 3:25 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 688
I don't disagree that an aboriginal interpretive centre / museum is a good idea, I just don't think this is the right place for it. The building's architecture screams colonialism...

Meanwhile, many aboriginal leaders have long suggested having something built on Victoria Island...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 3:42 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcologist View Post
I don't disagree that an aboriginal interpretive centre / museum is a good idea, I just don't think this is the right place for it. The building's architecture screams colonialism...

Meanwhile, many aboriginal leaders have long suggested having something built on Victoria Island...
Yeah, a 1930s Beaux-Arts building is an odd fit to showcase indigenous cultures. It seems to me they could have found a vacant site somewhere in central Ottawa (including possibly the parking lot beside 100 Wellington) where a purpose-built facility could be built with more suitable architecture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 4:33 PM
AndyMEng AndyMEng is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Canada could really use its own version of the U.S. American Indian Museum (though maybe with a much different name.)
I think the new building would be a different use than simply a historical museum. At least, the potential is there to develop so much more than a simple museum. Community engagement, government engagement, policy building, education, and a better focus on indigenous movements and self governance, over and above the muddling, under-performing Indigenous and Northern Affairs.

We do have our version of the American Indian Museum, it's the Museum of History, with a sub-section of First Peoples. I realize I'm posting a photo of the main hall, but the exhibition is much larger and more thorough than that. Just pointing out that its the Douglas Cardinal show:

Canadian:

https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/me...oples-hall.jpg

American:

http://pixdaus.com/files/items/pics/...e1d3_large.jpg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2017, 4:39 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyMEng View Post
We do have our version of the American Indian Museum, it's the Museum of History, with a sub-section of First Peoples.
Worth more than a "sub-section" to me, really.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.