HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 4:41 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,293
So who will pay for all that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 9:05 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,475
Quote:
According to Bob Nightengale’s Sunday Notebook over at USA Today, Jerry Reinsdorf and the White Sox are currently exploring three sites for a potential move out of Guaranteed Rate Field after their lease ends in 2028:

The United Center area
Arlington Heights
Soldier Field
lol almost no one would make the trek to Arlington Heights just to watch us lose
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 11:23 AM
ChiND's Avatar
ChiND ChiND is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Sheboygan
Posts: 629
If the Sox move, I’d like to see them go near the United Center area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 6:04 PM
Chisouthside Chisouthside is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Silicon Valley/Chicago
Posts: 516
Is there enough space in the United Center lots to build a baseball stadium?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 6:20 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is online now
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chisouthside View Post
Is there enough space in the United Center lots to build a baseball stadium?
Unless the Bulls/Hawks construct another arena elsewhere on those lots or completely elsewhere downtown or in the metro, I do not see enough room to build a baseball stadium as is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 6:35 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
Unless the Bulls/Hawks construct another arena elsewhere on those lots or completely elsewhere downtown or in the metro, I do not see enough room to build a baseball stadium as is.
You could fit a park north or west of United Center. A little tight but doable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 6:38 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,293
Roughly measuring Sox park and its circulatory sidewalks, it’s like 850’ X 900’ almost if you don’t count the sky bridge portion. At United Center, there’s plenty of East-West distance across the street, but North-South dimensions are constrained. Ideally, the ballpark would need 3 city blocks (wide) and 1.5 city blocks (long) to easily fit within the grid. But that means closing additional streets much needed for vehicular circulation. If the UC moved north of Madison occupying 2 blocks and Sox park replaced the arena footprint plus the south lot it would all fit. What a logistical nightmare.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2023, 6:43 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rizzo View Post
Roughly measuring Sox park and its circulatory sidewalks, it’s like 850’ X 900’ almost if you don’t count the sky bridge portion. At United Center, there’s plenty of East-West distance across the street, but North-South dimensions are constrained. Ideally, the ballpark would need 3 city blocks (wide) and 1.5 city blocks (long) to easily fit within the grid. But that means closing additional streets much needed for vehicular circulation. If the UC moved north of Madison occupying 2 blocks and Sox park replaced the arena footprint plus the south lot it would all fit. What a logistical nightmare.
You can shrink the footprint some. Think my preference would be west of Damen. Monroe is already closed on the block east.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2023, 5:13 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
You can shrink the footprint some. Think my preference would be west of Damen. Monroe is already closed on the block east.
How do you put it west of Damen without tearing down the neighborhood?

It would be very difficult to fit anywhere around there. Wrigley is 630' on a side and that is a tight fit anywhere around the UC, you'd have to vacate some streets and relocate others. Any modern stadium would be even larger and packed with entertainment options etc - 750' to 800' on a side.

The best option I think is to tear down the Advocate Center and build the baseball stadium east of the UC. Even this would not be easy, you'd have to vacate Wood St, push Madison to the north up against Warren, and push the Pink Line tracks east. But it would not kick anyone out of their homes.

I will humbly suggest the Damen Silos site... right off I-55, walkable to the Orange Line at Ashland, great skyline views, adjacent to the Sox historic stomping grounds in Bridgeport.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2023, 11:57 AM
MorganChi's Avatar
MorganChi MorganChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 185
I just seen something from the real deal that stated that Reinsdorf purchase some land in which some church owns by the united center , give me a sec I can paste the link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2023, 2:08 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
How do you put it west of Damen without tearing down the neighborhood?

It would be very difficult to fit anywhere around there. Wrigley is 630' on a side and that is a tight fit anywhere around the UC, you'd have to vacate some streets and relocate others. Any modern stadium would be even larger and packed with entertainment options etc - 750' to 800' on a side.

The best option I think is to tear down the Advocate Center and build the baseball stadium east of the UC. Even this would not be easy, you'd have to vacate Wood St, push Madison to the north up against Warren, and push the Pink Line tracks east. But it would not kick anyone out of their homes.

I will humbly suggest the Damen Silos site... right off I-55, walkable to the Orange Line at Ashland, great skyline views, adjacent to the Sox historic stomping grounds in Bridgeport.
I'm not sure demoing a dozen or so small structures plus the HS necessarily equals "tearing down the neighborhood". Sox ownership would probably be pretty happy to have a Wrigley sized stadium if they could get even close to Wrigley sized attendance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2023, 3:24 PM
galleyfox galleyfox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorganChi View Post
I just seen something from the real deal that stated that Reinsdorf purchase some land in which some church owns by the united center , give me a sec I can paste the link
1727 W Adams And 125 S Wood?

https://therealdeal.com/chicago/2023...united-center/

Looks like it was purchased for more parking, and I doubt it has baseball stadium implications.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2023, 5:15 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,475
White Sox VP Denies Team Close To Decision: Billions To Build New Ballpark ‘Doesn’t Fall Out Of The Sky’

Quote:
With six years left on the team's lease at Guaranteed Rate Field, White Sox Vice President of Sales and Service Jim Willits said at Bisnow’s Chicago Retail, Entertainment & Sports Trends event Tuesday that it's natural to look at what is available to the organization. Every option is on the table, he said, but rumors the team has already put together a shortlist of potential sites is just idle talk.

“That might mean we’re still at Guaranteed Rate Field,” Willits told Bisnow in an interview. “It doesn’t mean we’re going to go. We’re talking about billions of dollars to build a ballpark. That money doesn’t fall out of the sky.”
....
In response to a report by USA Today reporter Bob Nightengale speculating that the team is considering moving to three sites — Soldier Field, Arlington Heights or the United Center — Willits dispelled the notion the team had moved that far along in its plans.
https://www.bisnow.com/chicago/news/...ecision-120451
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2023, 8:37 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 534
.

Last edited by bhawk66; Sep 4, 2023 at 10:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2024, 6:51 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,475
In a meeting with the city, the White Sox said the parking lots surrounding Guaranteed Rate Field would get redeveloped even if they leave:
Quote:
The White Sox are also stressing that even if they abandon their century-long stay on 35th Street that the neighborhood won’t be left behind. The parking lots surrounding the stadium are ripe for a new mixed-use development with housing and green space, and there are slides depicting that vision.

And if Sox Park needs a new tenant, perhaps the Chicago Fire could be convinced to sign a lease, but the Fire have not been part of the discussions so far, sources say.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/poli...e-neighborhood
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2024, 3:34 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
In a meeting with the city, the White Sox said the parking lots surrounding Guaranteed Rate Field would get redeveloped even if they leave:

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/poli...e-neighborhood
Probably more likely to get developed if they leave, considering they themselves have been the primary impediment to them getting developed in the first place...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 3:01 AM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is online now
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,454
I don't remember reading these details before.....
Quote:
https://chicago.suntimes.com/white-s...ar-development

South Loop would get more than a new White Sox stadium — think residences, a hotel, restaurants and more
Ald. Nicole Lee’s 11th Ward includes Bridgeport, where the Sox have played for more than a century. But after she was briefed Friday night, she said the plans for The 78 looked too good to pass up, though “it breaks my heart to think that the team could go anywhere but stay on 35th Street.”
By Fran Spielman and David Roeder Updated Jan 19, 2024

Also in the plans are 4,000 parking spaces beneath Roosevelt Road north of the stadium and, to the south, a school with thousands of students alongside a University of Illinois research center known as Discovery Partners Institute. The institute’s executive director, Bill Jackson, confirmed those were major elements of Related Midwest’s plans....
..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 3:46 PM
moorhosj1 moorhosj1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
a school with thousands of students alongside a University of Illinois research center known as Discovery Partners Institute.
This piece of information makes me think this plan has actual legs. There have been fights over potential locations for a South Loop/Chinatown high school for years. Placing it next to the DPI would be great for students and highly accessible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 4:29 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorhosj1 View Post
This piece of information makes me think this plan has actual legs. There have been fights over potential locations for a South Loop/Chinatown high school for years. Placing it next to the DPI would be great for students and highly accessible.
https://blockclubchicago.org/2023/01...-need-to-know/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 5:45 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by west-town-brad View Post
Someone remind me please, why is the plan to build a new Near South Side high school "controversial?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.