HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2020, 9:53 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,638
I dug up images of the previous plan from 2013, for comparison purposes:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2020, 12:24 AM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,230
The townhouses in the original proposal was a nice touch. I actually prefer the original proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2020, 12:45 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinbottawa View Post
The townhouses in the original proposal was a nice touch. I actually prefer the original proposal.
I agree. Free standing towers with no podium looks weird. Three free standing towers with different designs surrounded by low density seems weird.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2020, 6:14 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,608
Quote:
Richcraft proposes trio of residential towers near Baseline station

OBJ, April 24, 2020



Years after scrapping a controversial plan to construct a trio of 15-storey condos near Algonquin College, an Ottawa developer has submitted a new proposal calling for three highrises of more than 20 storeys each at the site.

In planning documents recently filed at City Hall, Richcraft Homes says it wants to build three residential towers of 22, 24 and 26 storeys at 19 Centrepointe Dr., less than half a kilometre from the Baseline transit station that will be part of phase two of light rail. The project would include a total of 585 units in a mix of one- and two-bedroom apartments as well as studio units.

Unlike Richcraft’s previous plan, according to the documents prepared by Fotenn Planning + Design, “a significant portion” of the units in the latest proposal would be rental apartments.

The plan calls for a total of 552 parking spaces for vehicles, including 405 spaces for residents and 117 for visitors and all but 10 of them underground. There would also be 312 spots for bicycles.

All units on the ground floor of the buildings would be directly accessible from outside. The proposal includes more than 60,000 square feet of amenity space with nearly 40,000 square feet of communal areas featuring an indoor pool, cafe, gym and party room.

The proposal would require amendments to both zoning bylaws and the city’s official plan. The project’s height and density exceed current limits, while zoning bylaws now in place call for nearly 300 more parking spaces than Richcraft is proposing.

According to planning documents, Richcraft held a public consultation with the Centrepointe Community Association last November to discuss the plan, where residents expressed concerns about increased traffic and density and a lack of parking that could result in an overflow of cars on to nearby streets.

However, the developer says the site’s proximity to a future light rail station will likely translate into fewer residents requiring parking spots and a reduced flow of vehicles from the property.

“Given the transit-oriented nature of the development and its proximity to the Baseline Transit Station and the planned LRT extension, an effort should be made to encourage transit ridership within the development and a reduced parking rate would help achieve this,” the documents say. “An excess of bicycle parking is provided to offset some of the reduced private vehicle parking.”

This isn’t the first time Richcraft has proposed a major residential development for the Centrepointe Drive site.

In 2011, the developer filed plans for a two-highrise project featuring towers of 22 and 24 storeys. The proposal was later changed to three 15-storey condos, and council approved the project in early 2013 despite objections from some residents about the expected increase in vehicle traffic.

According to documents recently filed with the city, Richcraft planned to construct the towers over a period of five years, but the builder ultimately abandoned the project due to “changing market demand for condominium units.”
https://obj.ca/article/richcraft-pro...seline-station
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2020, 7:25 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Looks like more Lahey garbage
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2020, 7:58 PM
McKellarDweller's Avatar
McKellarDweller McKellarDweller is offline
inner city
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary/Ottawa
Posts: 479
I agree with others that the townhouses and podium from the old proposal are better for the street interaction, and overall aesthetics. I'm very happy with the density and use profile proposed though!! I'm really looking forward to seeing this Centrepointe-College Square-Baseline Station area "grow up" and get its much deserved way more live-work-play amenities in the next 20 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2020, 4:48 PM
Multi-modal Multi-modal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,146
This one got updated again to two 24 story towers with a 4-storey connecting podium and more ground floor oriented units (similar to the original proposal for this site). The architecture is still very RLA, but I like the massing much better:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2020, 5:25 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,608
I much prefer this to the three independent towers. Design is still "very RLA", to use your words, but better than other RLA designs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2020, 5:26 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 688
This latest proposal is by far the best of the three, but I'm it's too bad they didn't keep three more slender towers, rather than the two bulkier ones.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 1:01 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,638
Here are a few more renderings, including several that feature a dog's butt:





























https://app01.ottawa.ca/postingplans...appId=__BRA9GP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 1:34 AM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,720
People are going to come to this city in 10 years when half of the towers in the city are nearly identical RLA designs and be very very confused.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 2:07 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,638
The design changes proposed in this latest submission seek to improve the angular plane of the towers and create a softer transition to low-rise dwellings across Centrepointe Drive in addition to some changes that reduce the massing of the building. Tower A is now proposed at 22-storeys and Tower B is proposed at 24-storeys. The following changes have been incorporated:
  • Modifying the tower design to create a more slender profile.
  • Stepping back of Tower B at levels 20 and 24 to improve the fit of the massing within the prescribed angular plane.
  • Portions of the glass façade at the podium levels have been changed to include solid materials.



















Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 2:52 AM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 1,843
These bland towers make me sad. Would rather have eight bland 6-floor buildings than two 24-floor towers surrounded by asphalt and grass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 3:53 AM
RideauRat RideauRat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 170
still the same 'Bleh' but with a 180 degree rotation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 12:51 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post
These bland towers make me sad. Would rather have eight bland 6-floor buildings than two 24-floor towers surrounded by asphalt and grass.
Roderick Lahey Architecture is ruining this city one neighbourhood at a time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 1:13 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley613 View Post
People are gofing to come to this city in 10 years when half of the towers in the city are nearly identical RLA designs and be very very confused.
Yeah, the typical story is someone coming home late and accidentally going in the wrong suburban house. We're going to have people coming in late and going in the entirely wrong condo tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 1:21 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
Yeah, the typical story is someone coming home late and accidentally going in the wrong suburban house. We're going to have people coming in late and going in the entirely wrong condo tower.
So true. Literally dozens of nearly identical institutional looking RLA towers with the exact same colour scheme, all within a few stories in height, all with subtle variations of the same design. Is this kind of thing happening in any other city on Earth?? One firm dominating the market so completely and with so little creativity???
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 2:47 PM
rumple-stilts rumple-stilts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley613 View Post
So true. Literally dozens of nearly identical institutional looking RLA towers with the exact same colour scheme, all within a few stories in height, all with subtle variations of the same design. Is this kind of thing happening in any other city on Earth?? One firm dominating the market so completely and with so little creativity???
Seems RLA had a bit more design juice in the tank back in 2010-11 as seen from page one concept. Time to retire!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted May 11, 2021, 2:52 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumple-stilts View Post
Seems RLA had a bit more design juice in the tank back in 2010-11 as seen from page one concept. Time to retire!
Ya, but it was very similar to some of his SoHo projects, built and conceptual. He was repeating better designs, but still repeating designs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted May 20, 2021, 2:16 PM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 875
Honestly, it's needed density for the area beside transit so it's nice to see some height outside of the core.... but those towers are so ugly lol. What a horrible design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.