HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 1:03 PM
mylesmalley's Avatar
mylesmalley mylesmalley is offline
Moderator / Supervillain
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 4,078
I don't think projects should get a pass just because it's better than what's there now. Same point goes for the size of the investment. Those ways of thinking are the reason why Rogers was able to build their giant sea of parking next to a suburban two floor call centre in the heart of the city. Same thinking lead to the giant suburban Sobeys at the most prominent intersection in the area. Am I glad those two companies invested in the area, created jobs, and improved the land? Absolutely. Could we have ended up with designs that were more urban in character, inline with the streetscape, pedestrian friendly, and a more efficient use of land? Absolutely. Missed opportunities.

I'm very happy to see this project being put forward. Even as it is, I think it would be a huge improvement to that area, I don't think questioning some design decisions or pushing the envelope is being negative in the least.
__________________
"When you go home tonight, there's gonna be another story on your house! "
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 1:31 PM
josh_cat_eyes's Avatar
josh_cat_eyes josh_cat_eyes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 2,576
So what if the developer paid some of the cost of relocating the NB Power substation across the street between Northumberland Dairy and the skatepark. It could be split with the city and the province. If this project is going to be built in phases over a 5-7 year period, that gives them ample time to relocate the substation and utilize that piece of land. As part of this project perhaps the city could negotiate the relocation of the transmission line to the south side of assumption starting at Vaughan Harvey ending by the RCMP barracks where the line starts to follow the water. This would mean the any future projects on the north side of Assumption (Downing Street, NE Corner of Assumption & Vaughan Harvey, NW Corner of Foundry & Assumption etc.) won’t have to deal with a giant transmission line being in the way.

I also noticed the whole podium is the same elevation so when it gets to assumption everything is raised up above street level. This is something that bugs me about Tanary Place, the building is lower than the sidewalk and therefore disconnected a bit from the street.
__________________
We The People

Last edited by josh_cat_eyes; May 13, 2021 at 1:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 4:18 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is offline
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 36,559
Relocation of the substation across the street to the south side of Assumption is an excellent idea, but perhaps not for the 20 Record development. It would however free up considerable land on the north side of Assumption on this block for a commercial/retail development of some kind - something which would help tie in this part of downtown with the riverfront.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 5:20 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,557
Saint John is combining and relocating two substations, one at each end of Union. The westerly substation is both close to the ocean and on a prime piece of land. It didn't seem to be too complicated or expensive, as far as infrastructure goes.

I noticed the whole section of Assomption south of Waterloo are part of the sports field complex property. Maybe put it there, and keep the lot across from the current substation open for development.

EDIT: looking closer, maybe the scrub immediately west of the dairy property between the trail/ballfield and Foundry's southern end would be the best place. City land already, same size as the current site (30,000 sq ft), access off Foundry just like the dairy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 7:28 PM
jonny golden jonny golden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Relocation of the substation across the street to the south side of Assumption is an excellent idea, but perhaps not for the 20 Record development. It would however free up considerable land on the north side of Assumption on this block for a commercial/retail development of some kind - something which would help tie in this part of downtown with the riverfront.
Agree. I don't think Lafford would be interested in waiting for the substation to be moved and then totally change their design. They have their land and their plans that they've invested a lot of time and effort on. They'll be proceeding with the property they've already purchased.

But moving the sub station across the street would be a great idea and would indeed open up a nice piece of land for development. I agree with adamuptownsj that between the ball fields and the dairy would be best. That would leave a lot more land east of the dairy for development.

Interestingly, when you look at the SNB property site map, it shows that the parcel of land that the sub station is on is larger than the fenced in area. It actually extends east and nicely fills in the corner of Assomption & Lutz. It would be an excellent property for development. Especially in light of Lafford's plans.


https://paol.snb.ca/paol.html?v=1.0....n&pan=01868338
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 8:32 PM
josh_cat_eyes's Avatar
josh_cat_eyes josh_cat_eyes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 2,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny golden View Post
Agree. I don't think Lafford would be interested in waiting for the substation to be moved and then totally change their design. They have their land and their plans that they've invested a lot of time and effort on. They'll be proceeding with the property they've already purchased.

But moving the sub station across the street would be a great idea and would indeed open up a nice piece of land for development. I agree with adamuptownsj that between the ball fields and the dairy would be best. That would leave a lot more land east of the dairy for development.

Interestingly, when you look at the SNB property site map, it shows that the parcel of land that the sub station is on is larger than the fenced in area. It actually extends east and nicely fills in the corner of Assomption & Lutz. It would be an excellent property for development. Especially in light of Lafford's plans.


https://paol.snb.ca/paol.html?v=1.0....n&pan=01868338
They wouldn’t have to wait! They could start phase one of there project now, and in the meantime the substation could be relocated. They are currently inhibited from use if the southern most portion of their lot because there is a power line crossing diagonally thought it. If this was to be removed, it would allow for better use of the full property and for frontage along Assumption Blvd.

It wouldn’t take that long to relocate this either, they would built the new substation, reroute the power lines, there would be an overnight interruption of power to allow for the hookup of the new substation and it would be done. We’re talking six months maximum.

It doesn’t even necessarily have to be on assumption, you could built it up by the storage units on the other side of Vaughan Harvey, that way it would be out of the way.
__________________
We The People
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 10:40 PM
jonny golden jonny golden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh_cat_eyes View Post
They wouldn’t have to wait! They could start phase one of there project now, and in the meantime the substation could be relocated. They are currently inhibited from use if the southern most portion of their lot because there is a power line crossing diagonally thought it. If this was to be removed, it would allow for better use of the full property and for frontage along Assumption Blvd.

It wouldn’t take that long to relocate this either, they would built the new substation, reroute the power lines, there would be an overnight interruption of power to allow for the hookup of the new substation and it would be done. We’re talking six months maximum.

It doesn’t even necessarily have to be on assumption, you could built it up by the storage units on the other side of Vaughan Harvey, that way it would be out of the way.
Yes you're right. I'd be very surprised if the developer changes their plans to include the southern portion of the property, although it would make for quite the project. Eventually that sub station will have to be moved somewhere else. One would think that the Lafford development will spur more building in the neighbourhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted May 13, 2021, 11:39 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh_cat_eyes View Post
They wouldn’t have to wait! They could start phase one of there project now, and in the meantime the substation could be relocated. They are currently inhibited from use if the southern most portion of their lot because there is a power line crossing diagonally thought it. If this was to be removed, it would allow for better use of the full property and for frontage along Assumption Blvd.

It wouldn’t take that long to relocate this either, they would built the new substation, reroute the power lines, there would be an overnight interruption of power to allow for the hookup of the new substation and it would be done. We’re talking six months maximum.

It doesn’t even necessarily have to be on assumption, you could built it up by the storage units on the other side of Vaughan Harvey, that way it would be out of the way.
Here? https://paol.snb.ca/paol.html?v=1.0....n&pan=06491097

And for an out-of-towner, where exactly is Assomption supposed to run east of Vaughan Harvey? Both it and Ivan Rand will need to cross Jonathan Creek, which was uncovered recently anyway. What's the plan with this area? History?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 2:07 AM
josh_cat_eyes's Avatar
josh_cat_eyes josh_cat_eyes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 2,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamuptownsj View Post
Here? https://paol.snb.ca/paol.html?v=1.0....n&pan=06491097

And for an out-of-towner, where exactly is Assomption supposed to run east of Vaughan Harvey? Both it and Ivan Rand will need to cross Jonathan Creek, which was uncovered recently anyway. What's the plan with this area? History?
I was just thinking up in that area, you don’t need a lot of space for a substation. Perhaps the little triangle of land between the road, rail line & Vaughan Harvey might do, or immediately across the street from that.

I believe that down the road they may have plans for Assumption to connect to west main or even to the 2021 Moncton-Riverview Causeway Bridge traffic circle.

Ivan Rand will connect with the other half of Ivan Rand in the more near future, probably winthin 10 years whereas the Assumption extension would be more like 20+ years.
__________________
We The People
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 9:19 AM
L'homard L'homard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,055
I cannot see a scenario where the city would want to get involved in any way with moving someone else's power substation, financially or otherwise.
Then again, they have no problem handing out my money to a privately owned sports team to enjoy a trip to China, and a worldwide arena management firm worth billions, so what do I know?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted May 20, 2021, 8:19 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is offline
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 36,559
Tower crane components have been dropped off at 20 Record Street!!!


Photo from Retail Talk & Share

They certainly aren't wasting any time on this one. They haven't even gotten their approval from PAC or city council yet (although I'm sure they realize this is a fait accompli in any event).

I think we may see the tower crane for 20 Record going up even before the tower crane for St. Bernard Square, even though that project was approved first.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted May 20, 2021, 10:39 PM
Monctoncore Monctoncore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Tower crane components have been dropped off at 20 Record Street!!!


Photo from Retail Talk & Share

They certainly aren't wasting any time on this one. They haven't even gotten their approval from PAC or city council yet (although I'm sure they realize this is a fait accompli in any event).

I think we may see the tower crane for 20 Record going up even before the tower crane for St. Bernard Square, even though that project was approved first.

Wow! They really aren’t wasting time. I’m so curious about all of this. There must have been some back door conversations going on with council for them to be jumping this quickly on all of this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted May 20, 2021, 11:27 PM
Philbilly Philbilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Moncton
Posts: 223
Smile

Wow! They really aren’t wasting time. I’m so curious about all of this. There must have been some back door conversations going on with council for them to be jumping this quickly on all of this.

I have to say , this is the fastest major project I seen moving from rendering to construction in a while .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted May 21, 2021, 10:01 AM
Nashe's Avatar
Nashe Nashe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 2,664
That will be a BIG crane. Don't they normally at least start site prep (digging) before they deliver a crane? So they have a place to put the mount?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted May 21, 2021, 10:05 AM
NBNYer's Avatar
NBNYer NBNYer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moncton
Posts: 1,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkuta View Post
That will be a BIG crane.
Add to that St-Bernard's square which is planned to start this year too and there should be two VERY tall cranes in downtown this fall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted May 21, 2021, 11:24 AM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is offline
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 36,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkuta View Post
That will be a BIG crane. Don't they normally at least start site prep (digging) before they deliver a crane? So they have a place to put the mount?
I'm sure they're just storing parts of the crane for now. The new apartment building going up on Lady Ada had crane parts lying on the ground for six months before they were finally assembled.

Lot's of site prep to do, especially excavation for the underground parking. I don't think we will be seeing the crane assembled until September or so.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted May 26, 2021, 9:35 PM
jonny golden jonny golden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,452
Next step in the process is the planning advisory committee meeting tonight on this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted May 27, 2021, 2:39 AM
jonny golden jonny golden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny golden View Post
Next step in the process is the planning advisory committee meeting tonight on this project.

And no surprises:

https://www5.moncton.ca/docs/pac/PAC..._20_Record.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted May 27, 2021, 12:35 PM
NBNYer's Avatar
NBNYer NBNYer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moncton
Posts: 1,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny golden View Post
Its also been reported that with this development, the city is planning on removing on-street parking on Assomption Blvd. to add through lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted May 27, 2021, 12:50 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is offline
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 36,559
CBC article about the PAC approval of this project:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-b...wers-1.6041966

According to the article, construction will commence by July, with the first tower (phase one) open by September 2023. Phase two and phase three will proceed as market conditions allow (ie - if the first tower fills up quickly, then phase two will proceed expeditiously and so on). I would imagine the earliest date for completion of the entire project would be 2027.

The majority of the units will be one bedroom, with a lesser number of two bedroom units. A small number of three bedroom penthouse units will be available. Lafford skirted any questions about affordable housing options in this development, and he is obviously planning on this being a high end development. This is OK. It's important to get downsizing empty nesters used to the idea of downtown living first. Mandated affordable housing can wait for subsequent developments.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.