HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5861  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 2:35 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
^ With more McDonalds leadership living downtown and having to see this out-of-place atrocity, that may actually happen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5862  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 2:40 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,990
a BIG thank you to solar wind for getting this thread back on track with all of the wonderful construction pics!

it's a welcome change from the back and forth off topic nonsense of the previous two days. great job!
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5863  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 2:52 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,888
Looks like 640 N Wells is close to topping out.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5864  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 4:37 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ With more McDonalds leadership living downtown and having to see this out-of-place atrocity, that may actually happen
Does anyone know if the site is owned by the McDonalds company?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5865  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 5:30 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 4,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by VKChaz View Post
Does anyone know if the site is owned by the McDonalds company?
Yes, I believe this is corporate-owned and not a franchise site, since it is considered a 'flagship' restaurant. Other US flagships: NYC Times Square, Las Vegas strip (2-3 stories) and Oakbrook Center near their current HQ.

This facility was built as the '50th Anniversary' celebration design...so unfortunately, I don't think it's gonna be on the market anytime soon...HOWEVER, since corporate has been selling many more stores to reduce their number of restaurants (and selling to franchisees), that might change for this hulking monstrosity, if there is a developer willing to pay the right price for the land.

Addendum: The original design was supposed to be from a winning competition, and I believe (Murphy) JAHN won that...then the in-house corporate team of architects and designers started feeling threatened so they completed nixed that design and created a weird, modernized representation of the original restaurant. On steroids.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5866  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 6:21 PM
Jim in Chicago Jim in Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Yes, I believe this is corporate-owned and not a franchise site, since it is considered a 'flagship' restaurant. Other US flagships: NYC Times Square, Las Vegas strip (2-3 stories) and Oakbrook Center near their current HQ.

This facility was built as the '50th Anniversary' celebration design...so unfortunately, I don't think it's gonna be on the market anytime soon...HOWEVER, since corporate has been selling many more stores to reduce their number of restaurants (and selling to franchisees), that might change for this hulking monstrosity, if there is a developer willing to pay the right price for the land.

Addendum: The original design was supposed to be from a winning competition, and I believe (Murphy) JAHN won that...then the in-house corporate team of architects and designers started feeling threatened so they completed nixed that design and created a weird, modernized representation of the original restaurant. On steroids.
There was also the very fun sort of deconstructed McD's at Harlem and Cicero in Berwyn. Holding down the corner of a very bizarre strip mall that also included things like cars on a spike, and a desconstructed car on one wall of the mall. The McD's existed for many years, but very much sanitized, but has since been replaced.

https://www.whyberwyn.com/featured/a...-cermak-plaza/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5867  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 6:44 PM
KWILLSKYLINE's Avatar
KWILLSKYLINE KWILLSKYLINE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 625
If that land is owned by McDonalds, would that make the price of land be rediculously jacked up, or would it bring it down since it is hated so much? Even though that place makes more off of tourists than Burberry. Wha wha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5868  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 7:00 PM
Lakeviewguy Lakeviewguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 30
I think the McDonald's property should be taken by eminent domain and turned into a park. There is a BP station across the street and other poorly used properties in the near vicinity that would be developed virtually overnight if the McDonald's Property was turned into a kind of Millennium Park of River North.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5869  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 7:47 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Looks like 640 N Wells is close to topping out.
I think it's already there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5870  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 8:29 PM
Near North Resident Near North Resident is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonJXN View Post
It's been said before but it bears repeating: That McDonalds needs to go.
I believe I read somewhere it is one of the most profitable corporate owned McDonalds in the world... it ain't going anywhere
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5871  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 8:56 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Near North Resident View Post
I believe I read somewhere it is one of the most profitable corporate owned McDonalds in the world... it ain't going anywhere
That parking lot also has to be a cash cow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5872  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 9:28 PM
deebirch deebirch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Near North Resident View Post
I believe I read somewhere it is one of the most profitable corporate owned McDonalds in the world... it ain't going anywhere
If you've ever been to this location after a Friday/Saturday night out, you can attest to the validity of this statement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5873  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2016, 10:08 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,888
As far as I know, McDonald's pretty much owns all of the land at all of its franchises, but the franchisee's run the business that is occupied on said land. To my knowledge, this is actually how a lot of these franchise companies like McDonald's potentially make tons of money. The store making $1M/year for its franchisee is great for them, but they sit on the real estate making a lot of money and I believe the franchisee sees none of that money if they sell. Could be wrong though - a coworker told me this whose wife is a high level executive at a major "professional services" (can't say which one) company.


Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
That parking lot also has to be a cash cow.
Easily. If I were them, I'd keep a small amount of parking and sell off 3/4 of it. US Bank was smart enough to do that on Clark just north of Chicago Ave to build that new tower. McDonald's would make millions by just selling off 3/4 of the parking lot. Pretty sure for that McDonald's, most of their business comes from people not driving and parking - there's probably a good amount from drive thru so they can keep that but I'd be willing to bet, at least from what I've seen, that most of the cars parking in that lot are not people eating at McDonald's. Even if they were charging $10/day for an average of 150 cars per day, 365 days per year - and that land was worth $20M, it would take McDonald's over 36 years to make $20M off of parking - not counting any taxes, upkeep, etc they have to pay.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5874  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 12:06 AM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakeviewguy View Post
I think the McDonald's property should be taken by eminent domain and turned into a park. There is a BP station across the street and other poorly used properties in the near vicinity that would be developed virtually overnight if the McDonald's Property was turned into a kind of Millennium Park of River North.
I had a similar thought but without using eminent domain. Given that McDonalds is a local company with a large local workforce, wondered if it would arrange with the city to redevelop the land into mostly public square (gaining PR benefits or tax benefits and so on). Potential new developments to the sides would then look out onto the square, creating an attractive setting. And, especially in the River North tourist and entertainment area, it could become a very useful, popular and active space.

Last edited by VKChaz; Nov 19, 2016 at 12:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5875  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 12:12 AM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by deebirch View Post
If you've ever been to this location after a Friday/Saturday night out, you can attest to the validity of this statement.
It's also significantly more expensive than other nearby McDonalds and, in my experience, has some of the worst service of any McDonalds I've been to. You'd think they'd put an excellent manager in that location, but the management staff there must be placed there for political reasons because it seems to run really poorly from a service standpoint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5876  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 10:40 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
A one square block park in River North would be a dream. But that needs to be a philanthropic effort.

Or perhaps part of a general area renewal project, where the developers pay to acquire the land from McDonald's in exchange for zoning variances for the surrounding parcels (which would of course increase in value)?

Last edited by 10023; Nov 19, 2016 at 11:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5877  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 1:07 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,246
^^ Talking about prime lots with potential what about that Unitied state post office 1 story building right across the street from Mcdonalds that takes up what seems likes blocks!.. What a waste of space and street level presence killer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5878  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 2:11 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
^ Yeah that thing is horrible. River North is rebooting and some entities haven't gotten the message yet. There is way more value to unlock in that land.

It may take a few more cycles though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5879  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2016, 10:07 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,246
while this boom is impressive with its number of apartment buildings and varying designs its not as impressive as the last boom when we had a average higher height of the buildings..(believe 15 to 20 buildings over 500ft under construction at one time.) What ever happen to that push that mayor daley used to emphasize "taller and thinner" buildings...I feel like we moved backwards into the shorter 30 something story building standard again
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5880  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2016, 12:50 AM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicubs111 View Post
^^ Talking about prime lots with potential what about that Unitied state post office 1 story building right across the street from Mcdonalds that takes up what seems likes blocks!.. What a waste of space and street level presence killer
Officially, when the Post Office does vacate it, the City would like that block to turn into a park. It's part of the Central Area Action Plan to create a Ft. Dearborn park there. See the last page on this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.