Quote:
Originally Posted by FairHamilton
That will leave one side of the street with orphaned parking spaces. Assuming the LRT has it's own segregated lane, cars wouldn't be able to get the parking spots.
Possible solutions, 1. Remove the traffic calming 'bumps' on one side and run a lane, car or LRT. 2. Widen the sidewalk into the parking spaces on the orphaned side of the street.
|
you need to visit a city with LRT. it's accepted to pull across the tracks to park in curbside parking.
One time in Portland, I stopped for about 30 seconds too long on the tracks and these 'transit cops' came out of the woodwork and told me to move it or get towed.
I'd prefer both LRT's on Main and have Main/King go two-way.
Mark my words, no way they remove street parking in the IV. there's no need, regardless of whether it goes two-way or not. This city needs to wrap their heads around the fact that LRT will lure many people out of their cars. We don't need to keep the same car capacity, especially with streets like Cannon/Wilson/Hunter/Charlton/Herkimer/York nearby to pick up the slack. I feel stupid listing off so many street names - this city is such an embarassment in that regard. We don't need all these lanes!!!