HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    The St. Regis Chicago in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 5:13 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,970
Nov 20





__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 12:51 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 2:15 PM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,145
It will be really sad if the glass on this finishes before gems 2. Lol. Whats the hold up gems?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 3:37 PM
Bombardier Bombardier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 470
^GEMS 2 is on hold indefinitely due to non-payment. Many unpaid parties on that project, unfortunately.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 5:18 PM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombardier View Post
^GEMS 2 is on hold indefinitely due to non-payment. Many unpaid parties on that project, unfortunately.
Thats the first I heard of that. What a bummer. So close to comlpetion. I hope the parents haven't already signed their tuition checks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 5:24 PM
kolchak's Avatar
kolchak kolchak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 880
Well it just goes to show. As many times as I've looked at the renderings I never put it together that the 'secondary' window treatment over the entrance mimics the alternating frustums of the tower. Very cool.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 5:28 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by kolchak View Post
Well it just goes to show. As many times as I've looked at the renderings I never put it together that the 'secondary' window treatment over the entrance mimics the alternating frustums of the tower. Very cool.
Me either. Always thought that part of the building was odd in combination with the rest. Glad to see it now. Good catch.

I'm definitely gonna have dinner there someday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 6:03 PM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by kolchak View Post
Well it just goes to show. As many times as I've looked at the renderings I never put it together that the 'secondary' window treatment over the entrance mimics the alternating frustums of the tower. Very cool.
hah, would ya look at that. never thought of it.
__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 8:49 PM
jjk113 jjk113 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 59
do we have an estimate as to when it will be completely clad?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 9:00 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombardier View Post
^GEMS 2 is on hold indefinitely due to non-payment. Many unpaid parties on that project, unfortunately.
Hmmm... Well, If all fails, they now have the shell for the public school the was always apart of the LSE plan
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 9:12 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Anybody have any intel on who bought the ~$20M penthouse here? It'll be fun when all of those units close and if we can see who was buying them. I assume there's a number of foreign entities who've bought in this building which will be hard to trace back to a real person.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 1:04 AM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Hmmm... Well, If all fails, they now have the shell for the public school the was always apart of the LSE plan
if only

Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Anybody have any intel on who bought the ~$20M penthouse here? It'll be fun when all of those units close and if we can see who was buying them. I assume there's a number of foreign entities who've bought in this building which will be hard to trace back to a real person.
i vaguely remember Magellan confirming the penthouse investor is foreign and saying they won't be telling us any nationalities yet
__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.

Last edited by cozy; Nov 24, 2019 at 1:04 AM. Reason: "penthouse" investor
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 1:20 AM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Anybody have any intel on who bought the ~$20M penthouse here? It'll be fun when all of those units close and if we can see who was buying them. I assume there's a number of foreign entities who've bought in this building which will be hard to trace back to a real person.
edit/drunkenness

Last edited by bhawk66; Nov 24, 2019 at 7:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 4:11 PM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
furniture coming in? or does mayflower move anything











__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 9:05 PM
alegalvvan94's Avatar
alegalvvan94 alegalvvan94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 9:47 PM
chicagodeckerdude's Avatar
chicagodeckerdude chicagodeckerdude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Portland
Posts: 78
Some may be annoyed because it has been asked a few times already I'm sure. But...why does this building require that blow thru floor when many other skyscrapers and supertalls don't have them?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 9:55 PM
gebs's Avatar
gebs gebs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: South Loop
Posts: 809
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagodeckerdude View Post
Some may be annoyed because it has been asked a few times already I'm sure. But...why does this building require that blow thru floor when many other skyscrapers and supertalls don't have them?
My non-technical assumption is that it has to do with the slenderness of the top frustum. You'll see a similar approach taken at 432 Park Avenue, but in that case, the blow-through floors are at regular intervals, so it looks planned and better integrated into the design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 10:59 PM
Ogdenman36 Ogdenman36 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
Great last pic! It is such a beauty, but looks unfinished with blow through. Hoping it will grow on me like the Tesla Truck
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2019, 12:56 AM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop Gate, Chicago
Posts: 941
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagodeckerdude View Post
Some may be annoyed because it has been asked a few times already I'm sure. But...why does this building require that blow thru floor when many other skyscrapers and supertalls don't have them?
Seeing as these will be some of the most expensive condo's in Chicago it seems the developers are doing everything they can to maximize the comfort for the buyers (i.e. multiple slosh tanks and blow-through floor).

Personally, I like it. It is the first of its kind for Chicago and I think will look attractive once complete.

There is always the highly unlikely scenario the engineers realized something before it was too late and added it out of necessity like New York's Citicorp building. If this was the case I highly doubt it was as dramatic as the Citicorp situation but you never know.

http://www.engineersjournal.ie/2015/...ilure-averted/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2019, 2:19 AM
Barrelfish Barrelfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 197
My understanding is that it goes something like this:
  • Originally, the narrow parts of each frustrum were going to be even narrower (going from 90ish feet at the widest point down to 70ish feet at the narrowest)
  • These got widened so there were fewer difference in floorplans on the wide vs. narrow floors (now more like 90ish vs. 80ish). This brought more usable square footage and also reduced costs (less need to jog plumbinb back and forth, etc.)
  • That extra width, combined with the buildings narrow profile + the fact that the middle frustrum isn't directly anchored to the ground (there's a roadway underneath), meant that sway was higher than they wanted during wind tunnel testing
  • Therefore, the blow through floor was added to reduce the sway. I think this was after construction was already started, so it was too late to change the design of the tower in a way that would eliminate the need for the blow through

I may be conflating things slightly (maybe the blowthru would have been required regardless of the change in floor plates), but that's the general gist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.