HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5621  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2026, 6:29 PM
reddo reddo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillDing View Post
I agree that 2/3 wouldn’t be doable. Is there maybe an option where the overall project gets implemented in phases? Maybe the arena gets prioritized and the convention centre portion gets pushed by 5-10 years. Or the project gets scaled back like the central library did. If scaled back by 1/3, I could see it being doable, but that is a big cut to the budget. I personally would rather have a scaled back version of something than nothing at all though.

I wonder if the current arena could be sold off to be repurposed as a manufacturing facility or storage warehouse of some sort, rather than the City paying to have it demolished. The massive parking lots around could also be subdivided and sold as industrial land. Maybe this and naming rights knock off 10%ish of the remaining $330M? Still a lot more ground to cover….

I think that property taxes are the only way to cover the difference. I believe they ballparked renovations of Sasktel Centre at about $300M anyways with most coming from property taxes, so all things being equal, putting money to something new makes the most sense.

Property taxes from the existing arena land and new developments around the DEED, and the fact that revenue doesn’t need to be paid to OVG (if Sasktel & TCU team up to manage it) would also help a bit.
Hmmm interesting some friends and I have been looking into a business and I think the building would actually be pretty usable for us and the massive parking lot would be great for storage and truck access is already pretty good there. Now just need to find a large amount of money to finance everything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5622  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2026, 7:58 PM
GibblyJibbly GibblyJibbly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 23
Anyone here tuned in to the mining industry? It feels like we've become a major global hub for mining. Nutrien, Cameco, BHP, Denison, etc. Now, Sandvik building a manufacturing and servicing plant. SRC on 51st processing rare earths metals out of SK mined ore, with a US company buying 80% of its output over 5 years.

I wonder what other downstream industry we could see open up shop here? Could we see magnet/ev motor manufacturing?

Is it naive to think with the major players in mining all being based here, that we could see even more follow suit?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5623  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2026, 5:27 AM
phone's Avatar
phone phone is offline
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by GibblyJibbly View Post
Anyone here tuned in to the mining industry? It feels like we've become a major global hub for mining. Nutrien, Cameco, BHP, Denison, etc. Now, Sandvik building a manufacturing and servicing plant. SRC on 51st processing rare earths metals out of SK mined ore, with a US company buying 80% of its output over 5 years.

I wonder what other downstream industry we could see open up shop here? Could we see magnet/ev motor manufacturing?

Is it naive to think with the major players in mining all being based here, that we could see even more follow suit?
I don't think it's naive at all. I think it's true, likely to remain true, and a critical path for the future relevance of Saskatoon as a city in its current constitution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5624  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2026, 6:26 PM
circle33's Avatar
circle33 circle33 is offline
Has been
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 4,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by GibblyJibbly View Post
Anyone here tuned in to the mining industry? It feels like we've become a major global hub for mining. Nutrien, Cameco, BHP, Denison, etc. Now, Sandvik building a manufacturing and servicing plant. SRC on 51st processing rare earths metals out of SK mined ore, with a US company buying 80% of its output over 5 years.

I wonder what other downstream industry we could see open up shop here? Could we see magnet/ev motor manufacturing?

Is it naive to think with the major players in mining all being based here, that we could see even more follow suit?
We are also home to a cutting edge, globally recognized (albeit in a very small circle) geophysical exploration company.
https://diasgeo.com/. That said I can't see us supplanting Toronto or Vancouver as the primary head office location in the sector.
__________________
signature
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5625  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2026, 7:28 PM
James Bond Agent 007's Avatar
James Bond Agent 007 James Bond Agent 007 is online now
Posh
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
Posts: 23,602
Today I went to a nursery in Lee's Summit, and they had a variety of dwarf cherry trees that said on the label, "Developed at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon."
__________________
You fill me with inertia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5626  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2026, 9:59 PM
jreid3 jreid3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2025
Posts: 19
https://www.baydoapartments.ca/baydo-tow...A4XKxu8eAuK9tnxSnqUUWyjKFQMaAhczEALw_wcB

Prices of rent for the first Baydo tower. As per the website suites available April 1.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5627  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2026, 4:02 PM
Antigonish Antigonish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home sweet home
Posts: 836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutopian View Post
Business groups raise concerns over Saskatoon rapid transit plan

By Jon Perez
SaskToday
Mar 17, 2026


SASKATOON — Two Saskatoon business groups are raising red flags over the city’s Bus Rapid Transit plan, warning proposed changes could disrupt downtown access and hurt local commerce.

Two business leaders say the current approach to planning and implementing the city’s Bus Rapid Transit system, particularly its potential impact on downtown businesses, is problematic, raising concerns about the risk of disrupting traffic, hurting downtown commerce and missing key stakeholder input.

[........]

Read more:
https://www.sasktoday.ca/saskatoon-today...tm_content=409377976&utm_source=hs_email
The proposed BRT system seems kind of farcical in its implementation but I suspect it was half-assed to meet a deadline to receive funding from the Housing Accelerator Fund. Ironically enough this stretch of 1st Street is one of the few areas they actually did right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5628  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2026, 4:21 AM
Dalreg's Avatar
Dalreg Dalreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,992
You confused the heck out of me. 1st Avenue not 1st Street.
__________________
Blow this popsicle stand
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5629  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2026, 3:23 PM
Antigonish Antigonish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home sweet home
Posts: 836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalreg View Post
You confused the heck out of me. 1st Avenue not 1st Street.
Whoops, brainfart

However, I still stand by my point!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5630  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2026, 12:47 AM
phone's Avatar
phone phone is offline
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond Agent 007 View Post
Today I went to a nursery in Lee's Summit, and they had a variety of dwarf cherry trees that said on the label, "Developed at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon."
Its development may have some relationship to the Patterson Arboretum, an overlooked research arboretum, and sited on the University of Saskatchewan endowment/grant lands. They form part of the ag research plots surrounded on all sides by city. Much of this land is slated for dense infill, and it has already started to a limited extent with public and public/private development along some of the arterial fringes. But these are mostly limited to areas nearby pre-existing 20th century development

-2010s era student residences near Cumberland Ave
-Similar vintage hotel. Brutal walls, but the glass finishes (which include open elevators) are a thoughtful compromise nod to the practical realities of building up in a cold weather climate. As time has repeatedly borne out. They don't call them Commie Blocks just because of the politics... In partial defence of Baydo Towers...
-And, in similar thoughtful architectural compromise, and in shared spirit of not allowing the perfect to become the enemy of the good, and because Canada, a (mostly) hockey arena. Our major junior WHL team have started sharing ice time with our (very competitive) university sports programs.

Buuuuut as I understand it the arboretum is not on the chopping block. So more cherry tree carols to come
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5631  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2026, 1:02 AM
phone's Avatar
phone phone is offline
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antigonish View Post
The proposed BRT system seems kind of farcical in its implementation but I suspect it was half-assed to meet a deadline to receive funding from the Housing Accelerator Fund. Ironically enough this stretch of 1st Street is one of the few areas they actually did right.
Its farcical on short term planning, but if the long term goal is to establish some form of street-level LRT in Saskatoon, this goes a long way to getting a bit of hard infrastructure in place, local citizens accustomed to transit lanes, and establish easy to remember "Red/Green/Blue" lines with legible conventional streetname-based "Stations" (even if only in the most farcical sense of the word), then this accomplishes that goal. Louise Station. Avenue W Station. Nelson Station. I think that these local morphemes will enter the vocab in the 2030s first by developers and realtors and then the public at large. Think about Ontario developers coming in and thinking how to market their new midrise -- "2 blocks from Arlington Station" is something that would probably come to mind in a Bay Street brainstorming session. And I bet you it will all come in time.

Based on the renderings, the platform fixtures look functional without being square boxes. The round design means that snow wont pile easily, and the materials look easy to maintain. I am also heartened by the municipal funding of transit police.

We have a stable local government, a provincial government that is increasingly concerned about its urban reputation, and a Federal government that's basically treating Saskatoon like the most interesting lady at the dance. All three levels of government are basically in sync right now, and the city is growing fast, so why wouldn't Saskatoon strike while the iron is hot and get *something* out there, even if its "farcical" compared to real BRT (how did it turn out when Winnipeg bit off that cigar?). Preston Avenue, 8th Street, 22nd, all these streets have such wide ROWs that running Canadian-built trains down a greenway or something shouldn't be much of a problem to adapt to in 10-20 years, if the stars continue to align (or realign).

Saskatoon is getting much improved public transit. Yes, the BRT label gives people easy bait to scoff at, but I really think that the right thought has been put into this, and the Link system (lets start just calling it Link instead of BRT), has the bones to prove a durable system. The goal is to lay a foundation, and this does it. We're already seeing rapid investment along corridors even in Woodlawn... anyone drive up Idylwyld North lately? There's multiple multi-units going up, and Quebec Ave feels more filled-in (if not built out) than ever. Concept renderings are up for some kind of multi-family on a big Remax sign for three lots in Minto Place. Going all "Not Just Bikes" over it accomplishes nothing and is counterproductive. I kind of hate how his poo-poo attitude has kind of poisoned the well when talking about North American cities, as if nothing could ever be good enough to compare to Western Europe (those circles don't seem to pay much mind to the advanced cities of East Asia or the Global South), and is therefore deserving of ridicule. Saskatoon has fared a lot better than most of its North American counterparts, so let's take improvements for what they are and continue to improve on them as the city grows and levels of government cooperate.

Last edited by phone; Apr 4, 2026 at 3:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5632  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2026, 10:33 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by phone View Post
Its farcical on short term planning, but if the long term goal is to establish some form of street-level LRT in Saskatoon, this goes a long way to getting a bit of hard infrastructure in place, local citizens accustomed to transit lanes, and establish easy to remember "Red/Green/Blue" lines with legible conventional streetname-based "Stations" (even if only in the most farcical sense of the word), then this accomplishes that goal. Louise Station. Avenue W Station. Nelson Station. I think that these local morphemes will enter the vocab in the 2030s first by developers and realtors and then the public at large. Think about Ontario developers coming in and thinking how to market their new midrise -- "2 blocks from Arlington Station" is something that would probably come to mind in a Bay Street brainstorming session. And I bet you it will all come in time.

Based on the renderings, the platform fixtures look functional without being square boxes. The round design means that snow wont pile easily, and the materials look easy to maintain. I am also heartened by the municipal funding of transit police.

We have a stable local government, a provincial government that is increasingly concerned about its urban reputation, and a Federal government that's basically treating Saskatoon like the most interesting lady at the dance. All three levels of government are basically in sync right now, and the city is growing fast, so why wouldn't Saskatoon strike while the iron is hot and get *something* out there, even if its "farcical" compared to real BRT (how did it turn out when Winnipeg bit off that cigar?). Preston Avenue, 8th Street, 22nd, all these streets have such wide ROWs that running Canadian-built trains down a greenway or something shouldn't be much of a problem to adapt to in 10-20 years, if the stars continue to align (or realign).

Saskatoon is getting much improved public transit. Yes, the BRT label gives people easy bait to scoff at, but I really think that the right thought has been put into this, and the Link system (lets start just calling it Link instead of BRT), has the bones to prove a durable system. The goal is to lay a foundation, and this does it. We're already seeing rapid investment along corridors even in Woodlawn... anyone drive up Idylwyld North lately? There's multiple multi-units going up, and Quebec Ave feels more filled-in (if not built out) than ever. Concept renderings are up for some kind of multi-family on a big Remax sign for three lots in Minto Place. Going all "Not Just Bikes" over it accomplishes nothing and is counterproductive. I kind of hate how his poo-poo attitude has kind of poisoned the well when talking about North American cities, as if nothing could ever be good enough to compare to Western Europe (those circles don't seem to pay much mind to the advanced cities of East Asia or the Global South), and is therefore deserving of ridicule. Saskatoon has fared a lot better than most of its North American counterparts, so let's take improvements for what they are and continue to improve on them as the city grows and levels of government cooperate.
Great post. By my calculations, at current growth rates, the Saskatoon CMA could be 500,000 by 2037-ish. You're right -- we are growing fast. The need for effective rapid transit is only going to escalate as time goes on. Our rapid transit system needs to start somewhere, and I'm hoping that Saskatoon's planned BRT system will be effective enough at moving people around quicker than the current system that the mindset of Saskatonians will shift toward to one where "Hey, I can get from Aspen Ridge to downtown so quickly on Link that I will go to work on Link everyday instead of by car." We are such a car culture here that we need the value proposition of using Link to be so compelling that it trumps the old mindset of "Hey, I'll just hop in my car and go." All in my humble opinion, of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5633  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2026, 1:48 PM
4LSaskatoon 4LSaskatoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 165
Saskatoon is getting much improved public transit. Yes, the BRT label gives people easy bait to scoff at, but I really think that the right thought has been put into this, and the Link system (lets start just calling it Link instead of BRT), has the bones to prove a durable system. The goal is to lay a foundation, and this does it. We're already seeing rapid investment along corridors even in Woodlawn... anyone drive up Idylwyld North lately? There's multiple multi-units going up, and Quebec Ave feels more filled-in (if not built out) than ever. Concept renderings are up for some kind of multi-family on a big Remax sign for three lots in Minto Place. Going all "Not Just Bikes" over it accomplishes nothing and is counterproductive. I kind of hate how his poo-poo attitude has kind of poisoned the well when talking about North American cities, as if nothing could ever be good enough to compare to Western Europe (those circles don't seem to pay much mind to the advanced cities of East Asia or the Global South), and is therefore deserving of ridicule. Saskatoon has fared a lot better than most of its North American counterparts, so let's take improvements for what they are and continue to improve on them as the city grows and levels of government cooperate.[/QUOTE]

Completely agree!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5634  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2026, 4:48 PM
4LSaskatoon 4LSaskatoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 165
Update on Wellness center

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5635  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2026, 8:33 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,215
Federal infrastructure plan could apply to Saskatoon arena district

By Phil Tank
CBC News
Mar 30, 2026

Details are expected this spring on a federal program that could provide money for a proposed downtown Saskatoon arena district as city hall resets its funding plan.

The federal Ministry of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada said in an emailed statement to CBC that the $51-billion Build Communities Strong Fund is intended to "invest in infrastructure projects that strengthen communities," while also helping facilitate housing.

"The government will continue working collaboratively with its partners in cities like Saskatoon to achieve these goals," the email says.

[........]

Read more:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatoon...tm_content=411304681&utm_source=hs_email
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5636  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2026, 8:50 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4LSaskatoon View Post
Saskatoon is getting much improved public transit. Yes, the BRT label gives people easy bait to scoff at, but I really think that the right thought has been put into this, and the Link system (lets start just calling it Link instead of BRT), has the bones to prove a durable system. The goal is to lay a foundation, and this does it. We're already seeing rapid investment along corridors even in Woodlawn... anyone drive up Idylwyld North lately? There's multiple multi-units going up, and Quebec Ave feels more filled-in (if not built out) than ever. Concept renderings are up for some kind of multi-family on a big Remax sign for three lots in Minto Place. Going all "Not Just Bikes" over it accomplishes nothing and is counterproductive. I kind of hate how his poo-poo attitude has kind of poisoned the well when talking about North American cities, as if nothing could ever be good enough to compare to Western Europe (those circles don't seem to pay much mind to the advanced cities of East Asia or the Global South), and is therefore deserving of ridicule. Saskatoon has fared a lot better than most of its North American counterparts, so let's take improvements for what they are and continue to improve on them as the city grows and levels of government cooperate.
Completely agree![/QUOTE]

Not sure if Saskatoon's BRT plan involves having sophisticated digital boards at each transit station that indicate where the relevant Link bus is on its route and/or indicate how many minutes until the next Link bus arrives at that particular Link station; but these types of advancements in communication with riders will, I think, go a long way toward giving people confidence in the BRT system and its reliability, and perhaps encourage more ridership.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5637  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2026, 9:54 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,215
Lake Vista II development in Martensville closer to becoming reality after sitting in limbo since 2021

By KEVIN BERGER
Clark's Crossing Gazette
Mar 31, 2026


City of Martensville councillors voted during their March 17 meeting to pass first reading on a bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan in order to adopt the concept plan for the Lake Vista II Development, which has sat on the backburner for several years.

The Lake Vista II Concept Plan was created by the North Ridge Development Corporation for the future development of 167 acres of land north of Lake Vista 1.

The plan calls for the construction of 1,667 dwelling units, which could support a population of approximately 3,964 residents.

[........]

Read more:
https://ccgazette.ca/2026/03/31/lake-vis...tm_content=411942265&utm_source=hs_email
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5638  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2026, 10:47 PM
4LSaskatoon 4LSaskatoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 165
New Food Bank




New Saskatoon Food Bank Building update. Anticipating mid 2027 move in!
The three-acre lot will also provide enough space for a garden, the urban agriculture program, a commercial kitchen, and an expansion of the workplace training program
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5639  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2026, 10:52 PM
phone's Avatar
phone phone is offline
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutopian View Post
Not sure if Saskatoon's BRT plan involves having sophisticated digital boards at each transit station that indicate where the relevant Link bus is on its route and/or indicate how many minutes until the next Link bus arrives at that particular Link station; but these types of advancements in communication with riders will, I think, go a long way toward giving people confidence in the BRT system and its reliability, and perhaps encourage more ridership.
Agreed that this will be essential if there's going to be public buy-in. People need to be able to see it as the bones of something more to come, rather than "the bus". Don't quote me on this, but I recall reading somewhere that there will be wayfinding and live next arrival times. And the structures certainly look made to accommodate it.

I honestly do think that Link is such great branding, by the way. It's hard to fault it as reading "provincial" from a look and feel perspective.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5640  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2026, 6:25 PM
prairieguy prairieguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by phone View Post
Agreed that this will be essential if there's going to be public buy-in. People need to be able to see it as the bones of something more to come, rather than "the bus". Don't quote me on this, but I recall reading somewhere that there will be wayfinding and live next arrival times. And the structures certainly look made to accommodate it.

I honestly do think that Link is such great branding, by the way. It's hard to fault it as reading "provincial" from a look and feel perspective.
I do hope that the bus shelters that are appearing on the LINK stops are a temporary measure....I would like to see an investment in attractive and winter friendly shelters (maybe solar panels that power a heating system??). For ridership to go up, not only does the frequence of transit need to increase but it needs to be as accessible and comfortable as it can possibly be in a winter city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.