HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    The St. Regis Chicago in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 11:38 PM
Rooster slayer Rooster slayer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: The Fresh Coast
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
The program of a building is not an element of it's form, it IS the function. If the building calls for 1.2 million SF to be built on this skinny of a lot with a street going through the middle of it, that's going to dominate the entire design. Yes, they could have made a shorter building with no blow thru, they also could have built two single family homes on each corner facing the park and not have even needed elevators... Are elevators now also "function following form"?
I thought the blow through was an after thought is all. It followed. The design or shell of the building was determined and thankfully kept, but the blow through was later determined necessary. They lost some high priced units with that, I don't think it was part of the program.
__________________
The ones who love us best are the ones we'll lay to rest and visit their graves on holidays at best" - Paul Westerberg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2019, 1:35 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooster slayer View Post
I thought the blow through was an after thought is all. It followed. The design or shell of the building was determined and thankfully kept, but the blow through was later determined necessary. They lost some high priced units with that, I don't think it was part of the program.
Actually I'm pretty sure they didn't actually lose any SF and just increased the height of the building slightly. I think that accounts for the descrepancy between the 1150ish number we had originally heard and the final height just below 1,200 we wound up with. There was an engineering article posted a while ago that discussed how the blow thru wasn't in the original design until wind testing determined that they had to do something to resist the sway of such a narrow, slab like, structure. The same article also discussed the interesting unique linked double core of this building which has also been used as slight against this design. Turns out that unique sheer wall configuration was also a result of the massing of the structure and need to locate the core on either side of the street and not because of the frustums as was hypothosized by the anti-Gang contingent here on SSP.

Basically the conclusion of the article was that all the fancy cores, sheer walls, and dampering has nothing to do with the frustum form and everything to do with the extremely narrow, slab like, massing of the building which is basically outside of the architects control given the site constraints and the height of the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 3:20 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Going to be uploading some great shots I got today tomorrow after visiting a family friend in the Legacy. I was lucky the weather cleared up later in the day!
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 1:31 PM
Rooster slayer Rooster slayer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: The Fresh Coast
Posts: 104
Great pics solar...Love that 3rd one in.
__________________
The ones who love us best are the ones we'll lay to rest and visit their graves on holidays at best" - Paul Westerberg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 3:09 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
What a striking tower.

Do you guys think this will ever become iconic the way JHC and Aon are? (I’m guessing a strong “no!” but just thought I’d ask)
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 4:01 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
What a striking tower.

Do you guys think this will ever become iconic the way JHC and Aon are? (I’m guessing a strong “no!” but just thought I’d ask)
It'll 100% surpass the Aon once they bastardize it with the glass elevator and ruin its crown for the observatory. Even if they didn't do that, I could see tourists seeing it as more iconic than the Aon.

As for JHC, nah. JHC is routinely listed as one of the 5 most beautiful skyscrapers in the world. Vista's great, but might not even crack the top 100
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 2:35 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
It'll 100% surpass the Aon once they bastardize it with the glass elevator and ruin its crown for the observatory. Even if they didn't do that, I could see tourists seeing it as more iconic than the Aon.

As for JHC, nah. JHC is routinely listed as one of the 5 most beautiful skyscrapers in the world. Vista's great, but might not even crack the top 100
I disagree with you wholeheartedly on the whole observation level/exterior glass elevator on AON issue, but I definitely agree with you concerning JHC and Vista's place on the beautiful skyscrapers issue.

Of course, perhaps the reason I'm actually fond of the AON changes is because I'm not a huge fan of the tower to begin with architecturally, I absolutely love exterior glass elevators and I'm looking forward to the amazing views in literally all directions from the observation level! Haha

Aaron (Glowrock)
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 2:15 AM
The Pimp's Avatar
The Pimp The Pimp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago/Hamilton Lake
Posts: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
What a striking tower.

Do you guys think this will ever become iconic the way JHC and Aon are? (I’m guessing a strong “no!” but just thought I’d ask)
Why not?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 11:56 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
What a striking tower.

Do you guys think this will ever become iconic the way JHC and Aon are? (I’m guessing a strong “no!” but just thought I’d ask)

I say no. Nowhere near the Sears or the JHC at all.

Even the Aon [Standard Oil stood the test of time]

Its going to have to be a decade before we can discuss this topic again IMO.

Its simply tall because of the last stacking. Its missing the mass and functionality streetwise for me at least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2019, 8:04 AM
Dylan Dude Dylan Dude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
What a striking tower.

Do you guys think this will ever become iconic the way JHC and Aon are? (I’m guessing a strong “no!” but just thought I’d ask)
Why didn't you include Trump Tower? I think Trump Tower looks the best out of all 4 of Chicago's 1,100-1,200 footers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2019, 1:20 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Dude View Post
Why didn't you include Trump Tower? I think Trump Tower looks the best out of all 4 of Chicago's 1,100-1,200 footers
No, the Hancock is hands down the best supertall in Chicago. It's a radical, revolutionary building that set the bar for the Modern era of supertall construction. Pretty much everything since then has followed in it's mould.

It's also aesthetically perfect and philosophically pure from a design perspective. It's the perfect incarnation of structural expression and form follows function.

All you have to observe in a debate of Trump vs Hancock is that the JHC was so perfect that no one could find a better way to elevate cars into a podium (which is also seamlessly and perfectly handled unlike Trump) in the 40 years between the two. The JHC helix ramp was so perfect in 1969 that the Trump just copy and pasted it in 2009...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2019, 2:07 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
^ That is a great point. SOM had to look no further their own 40 year old design. Though I see it more as TT helix inspired by JHC, than copy/paste of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2019, 2:13 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
Regarding Vista’s “dark band” mechanical floors; it looks to me like that’s just black painted plywood and not the final louvers. Come to think of it, and without scrolling through a million [great] photos, I don’t recall seeing a single louver yet. Perhaps they’re having as much trouble with the louvers as they were with the glass system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2019, 4:19 PM
jc5680's Avatar
jc5680 jc5680 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 1,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Regarding Vista’s “dark band” mechanical floors; it looks to me like that’s just black painted plywood and not the final louvers. Come to think of it, and without scrolling through a million [great] photos, I don’t recall seeing a single louver yet. Perhaps they’re having as much trouble with the louvers as they were with the glass system.
I made a similar(hopeful) observation a few comments back—there are a number of good close up photos that show the black panels sitting recessed in the frames; and they all look to be solid. In particular, the awkwardness of the top segments where only half of the sides of two frustums have the panels, it looks much more likely to me that there is at the very least some sort of finishing detail missing. Best cast scenario is a louver system that has some tonal coherence with the window wall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 12:33 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588


























All taken within a three hour window of each other... I know some are repetitive angles, but I was having fun with the chance at getting the pictures.
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 3:16 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 552
Great photo's Bonobo. Awesome!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 4:29 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
what's going on at the tippy top there
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 6:33 PM
cozy cozy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by maru2501 View Post
what's going on at the tippy top there
My guess is scaffolding for the window wall that will enclose the top mechanical levels and dampers
__________________
Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 1:18 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
I'm officially sold on the glass now...









What's that there?















Bottom is finally getting glassed up







__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 12:46 PM
Lincolnlover2005's Avatar
Lincolnlover2005 Lincolnlover2005 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 147
Chicago definitely wins floor wise (the amount of floors in a skyscraper)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.