HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #541  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2008, 11:22 PM
Mr Man Mr Man is offline
(insert title here)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Road Warrior
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Yes, but Bensenville plans to appeal. Time will tell just how far they are willing to go, and how much legal fees they are willing to pay, to halt this demolition.
I will never forgive the state of Illinois for not intervening in this matter. How much tax dollars have Bensenville and Chicago spent fighting over this? The O'Hare Modernization Act already gives Chicago all the authority it needs plus it's in the overall best interest of the entire region. There must be no less than two dozen Chicago attorneys who'll be able to retire comfortably when all this is said and done thanks to Bensenville.

I wonder how Bensenville is still solvent anyway. It has a powerful industrial base but that pales in the face of the millions on attorney's fees fighting this thing to the bitter end. Plus a huge chunk of their taxbase has been wiped out thanks to the tax-free emminet domain powers of King Daley.

Plus I may be the only one on the forums who thinks this weakened tax base may prelude to annexation. Chicago and Wood Dale can swoop in and divvy up the good stuff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #542  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2008, 11:39 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,636
Quote:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...,7071507.story

Financial woes in airline industry threaten to undermine Chicago airport expansion

By MICHAEL TARM | Associated Press Writer
5:40 AM CDT, August 9, 2008

CHICAGO (AP) _ Soaring gas prices have claimed plenty of victims — from SUV sales to stock market portfolios. They now threaten to claim another: the expansion of one of the world's busiest airports.

Chicago wants to complete the expansion of O'Hare International Airport, which relies heavily on revenue from cash-strapped airlines, by 2014 — two years before it hopes to host the Summer Olympics.

But carriers serving Chicago now appear reluctant to put up more money to finish the job because high fuel costs have cut so deeply into industry revenue, forcing airlines to raise fares, slash flights and lay off workers.

........Spokesmen for two airlines that control most of O'Hare's gates, American and United, said Friday that they continue to talk to expansion officials.

Boyd said the burden is on expansion officials to demonstrate that putting up the money will benefit airlines soon. But he's optimistic that O'Hare — with some adjustments — would secure the needed funds.........
..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #543  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2008, 12:55 AM
Marcu Marcu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Man View Post
I will never forgive the state of Illinois for not intervening in this matter. How much tax dollars have Bensenville and Chicago spent fighting over this?
I'm not sure what the state could have done or what you were looking for it to do. This is a constitutional taking issue, so it would have gone through the courts regardless of state law. Did you expect Blago to hold counseling sessions for the two cities?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #544  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2008, 4:10 AM
LaSalle.St.Station's Avatar
LaSalle.St.Station LaSalle.St.Station is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 335
Painsenville

this little hamlet is pullling out all the stops. but how can u argue a case already decided at the fed level?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #545  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2008, 4:09 PM
Chi_Coruscant Chi_Coruscant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 485

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,5546837.story

Judge puts demolition for O'Hare expansion on hold
By Art Barnum

Tribune reporter

9:59 AM CDT, August 11, 2008

The demolition of more than 500 Bensenville homes to make room for a new O'Hare Airport runway was delayed for at least 30 days on Monday by DuPage Judge Kenneth Popejoy.

Popejoy, who last week ruled that Chicago could begin demolition of the properties, said that he was issuing the order to allow attorneys for Bensenville to file an appeal with the 2nd District Illinois Appellate Court of his ruling.

Popejoy said that he was confident that his ruling last week was correct , "but Bensenville deserves the chance to appeal. But the delay granted by me ends on Sept. 10 and any further delay will be up to the appellate court."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #546  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2008, 5:09 PM
Marcu Marcu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,649
Some resident lawyer has to be doing this work for the village of Bensenville pro bono (aka as charity). There is no way Bensenville would have this kind of cash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #547  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2008, 6:21 AM
Mr Man Mr Man is offline
(insert title here)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Road Warrior
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcu View Post
I'm not sure what the state could have done or what you were looking for it to do. This is a constitutional taking issue, so it would have gone through the courts regardless of state law. Did you expect Blago to hold counseling sessions for the two cities?
You should read up on the amount of lawsuits being filed by Bensenville. The Eminent Domain ones were filed in the beginning and have long since been decided. Those were legitimate. Most of the new lawsuits filed by Bensenville are clearly stalling tactics. Also, the millions needed to fund Bensenville's frivolous legal battles are taxpayer funded.

The state has a lot of influence, but it has been largely absent from Chicago's battle with Bensenville. I think this shows lack of leadership. The only people benefiting from this long drawn-out legal battle are the attorneys.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #548  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2008, 6:26 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,490
Daley just needs to go Meigs on their asses...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #549  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2008, 3:07 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Man View Post
The state has a lot of influence, but it has been largely absent from Chicago's battle with Bensenville. I think this shows lack of leadership. The only people benefiting from this long drawn-out legal battle are the attorneys.
Every bit of Daley-controlled O'Hare that is expanded means less demand for a State-controlled boondoggle airport in Peotone, so why should they cooperate (or put another way, why should taxis ever treat buses kindly?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #550  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2008, 5:50 PM
Mr Man Mr Man is offline
(insert title here)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Road Warrior
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
Every bit of Daley-controlled O'Hare that is expanded means less demand for a State-controlled boondoggle airport in Peotone, so why should they cooperate (or put another way, why should taxis ever treat buses kindly?).
Ah, politics. How could I forget?

Why is the state pushing so hard for Peotone anyway? There are obvious benefits (an airport serving residents in the distant south suburbs, reducing congestion at O'Hare), but the negative consequences far exceed any benefits. (inconvenience passengers by being located far from the civilization, lack of rail infastrcture, and billions of dollars spent paving over productive farmland, etc...)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #551  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2008, 8:08 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Man View Post
Ah, politics. How could I forget?

Why is the state pushing so hard for Peotone anyway? There are obvious benefits (an airport serving residents in the distant south suburbs, reducing congestion at O'Hare), but the negative consequences far exceed any benefits. (inconvenience passengers by being located far from the civilization, lack of rail infastrcture, and billions of dollars spent paving over productive farmland, etc...)
You're missing the point; it only tangentially has to do with maximizing citizen benefit or efficient air operations. The state doesn't control the revenue stream and jobs (patronage) factory that is O'Hare Airport, but they would control a Peotone Airport.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #552  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2008, 10:30 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
You're missing the point; it only tangentially has to do with maximizing citizen benefit or efficient air operations. The state doesn't control the revenue stream and jobs (patronage) factory that is O'Hare Airport, but they would control a Peotone Airport.
Exactly. If it were simple utility in question, then Gary/Chicago would be the logical third airport. Hopefully with a nice high speed express rail connection to downtown. And the ability to expand all it wanted on landfill into the lake, like Hong Kong's airport.

Peotone could maybe be an airport for discount airlines but it doesn't work otherwise. Business travelers won't use it. If it were built and my assistant ever put me on a plane there, I'd tell her to cancel and book me a new ticket.
__________________
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." - Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #553  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 12:40 AM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
The state doesn't control the revenue stream and jobs (patronage) factory that is O'Hare Airport, but they would control a Peotone Airport.
How true.

I worked at O'Hare for a few years and always got a kick out of how the State of Illinois was cut out of the deal. This flag display says it all:



Chicago, USA !!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #554  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 2:19 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
... And the ability to expand all it wanted on landfill into the lake, like Hong Kong's airport.
That might be the best reason not to invest in Gary that I've ever heard.
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #555  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 4:41 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
Exactly. If it were simple utility in question, then Gary/Chicago would be the logical third airport. Hopefully with a nice high speed express rail connection to downtown. And the ability to expand all it wanted on landfill into the lake, like Hong Kong's airport.

Peotone could maybe be an airport for discount airlines but it doesn't work otherwise. Business travelers won't use it. If it were built and my assistant ever put me on a plane there, I'd tell her to cancel and book me a new ticket.
Even Gary would most likely be an LCC/discount airport, with maybe a few legacy carriers flying to their hubs for network connectivity. Business travel will probably always be (at least in our lifetimes) to and from O'Hare, barring any major economic development and headquarter relocation to NW Indiana or the Southland. But yeah, Gary is the obvious functional choice for the 3rd airport, if anything because of the reason it already exists. The fact that it has a rail connection to downtown Chicago, easy expressway access, and serves the ~800,000 people in NW Indiana in addition to the hundreds of thousands of Will County/Southern Cook residents who would benefit from Peotone is just gravy.

But of course, the State of Illinois would have even less control of Gary than they do of O'Hare.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #556  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 4:43 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,490
^^^ They could always expand a Gary Airport by razing swaths of Gary since that city sucks anyhow...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #557  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 5:30 AM
Mr Man Mr Man is offline
(insert title here)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Road Warrior
Posts: 3,212
Midway still kicks all their asses.

OT but does anyone know a good resource for information about the Lake Calumet airport proposal? It probably was a bad idea, but it would have been somewhat cool for Chicago to have three major international airports all within the city limits.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #558  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 8:24 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,828
^Lake Calumet Airport would have required nearly complete demolition of Hegewisch and the suburb of Burnham, as well rerouting the Calumet River. The longest east-west runway would have also pierced into Indiana. The plan I saw may have not been the finished proposal and it wasn't on a public document.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #559  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 9:00 PM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
^^^ They could always expand a Gary Airport by razing swaths of Gary since that city sucks anyhow...
If by raze you mean move a few roads and railroad tracks...

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #560  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2008, 9:11 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Daley just needs to go Meigs on their asses...
They've put up some signs around Bensenville with the slogan "Don't Meigs with Us" and pictures of Meigs Field and Daley with X's on them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.