HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #541  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 4:51 AM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,543
Its not like taking out the luggage store will automatically mean some big chain will take its place. The property owner could even say "I want a small business or a chain un/under-represented in LA".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #542  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 4:59 AM
RAlossi RAlossi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,573
It kind of saddens me that LA Live will be getting PF Chang's and Gladstone's... While people from rural areas in the Midwest may be wow'd by the "diversity" and "culture" of those types of places, what will be there that someone can't get in Burbank or Century City? Not to mention the food at those places isn't the best. It's too suburban, IMO.

If those places are set in stone (i.e., signed leases), it's too bad that we couldn't have gotten some places that really represent LA -- even if they are successful chains or whatever.

I'm sure the surrounding area will have a dramatic increase in really good non-chain restaurants, but if LA LIVE wants to be an amazing place (and for more than a billion dollars, it should be) rather than just a "good" place or a "nice" place, then it has to do something different than all the boring "Shoppingtowns" in Southern California! ugh!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #543  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 5:14 AM
bobcat bobcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAlossi
If those places are set in stone (i.e., signed leases), it's too bad that we couldn't have gotten some places that really represent LA -- even if they are successful chains or whatever.
There's supposed to be Katsuya, a branch of one of the top rated local sushi restaurants. Also, they had originally wanted to do something with Lawry's, but I don't know if that's still in the works. A branch of Lawry's Prime Rib would be perfect for that location.

ETA: There was also mention of a branch of the highly acclaimed French 75 restaurants.

Last edited by bobcat; Sep 28, 2006 at 5:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #544  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 5:52 AM
RAlossi RAlossi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,573
I love Katsu-ya. Very good to know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #545  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 6:04 AM
Damien Damien is offline
Cool dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA-Leimert Park & Boston-Cambridge
Posts: 404
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesBeauty
^ I am concerned as much as you regarding WHAT KIND of retail leases out spaces in new developments. It's fun and interesting to come and theorize our view points and opinions on here (almost like a virtual college course discussion class), but I am personally involved with some retail developments in Downtown LA right now, and I am usually the one advocating independent businesses to set up shop.
Excellent. So please tell us what you think could be done to better attract mom and pops into downtown LA.

And more germane to this discussion, in places like Hollywood, which is very different than South Park in that there is an existing population with particular income levels, yet still needs new mixed-use developments, how do we make space for the good small businesses selling products affordable to the old residents (READ: people who make less per month than a mortgage payment on a $600K condo) in the new developments? If there are models I'd love to see them.

Quote:
While people from rural areas in the Midwest may be wow'd by the "diversity" and "culture" of those types of places, what will be there that someone can't get in Burbank or Century City?
With so few spots ever offering anything unique, and so few shopping centers actually providing community services, the race is simply to be newer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #546  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 7:19 AM
bobcat bobcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAlossi
I love Katsu-ya. Very good to know.
Here's the website for the "Katsuya" restaurants as opposed to the "Katsu-ya" restaurants. Same chef but different concept, apparently. The unhyphenated restaurants appear to be going after the younger, hipper crowd. Locations include restaurants in Brentwood (recently opened), Hollywood (Spring '07), Miami (Fall '07), and Downtown (Winter '08).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #547  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 7:34 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,712
I'm going to slot this here because, even though the thread is about Hollywood, the postings right now are wandering into a debate about retail & DTLA, or about what should or shouldn't be created in a hood that's fallen on hard times for yrs & yrs, meaning a place like DTLA or Hollywood, compared with a hood that's never fallen apart to begin with.

And I'll say at this point in time, for us in LA to be fussing over the pluses & minuses of a small luggage store in a hood long full of dives & starving shops is kind of like ppl stranded in Death Valley arguing over whether their glass of water should or shouldn't come with ice.

Meanwhile, some ppl in a stretch limo (folks from SF? from NY? from Chicago?) just drove by us at 80 miles an hour, with a mini fridge stocked full of every drink imaginable.


San Francisco Mall May Supply Concept for L.A.

A tall mall must draw shoppers in and up. It could serve as a model for other cities.

By Roger Vincent, Times Staff Writer
September 28, 2006

SAN FRANCISCO — A new style of high-rise mall that may serve as a model for downtown Los Angeles and other big city centers will open its doors here today as the largest urban shopping center west of the Mississippi River. The expanded San Francisco Centre in the heart of this city's historic commercial district at 5th and Market streets combines department stores, supermarkets, movie theaters, restaurants, shops, a spa and office space in two buildings, one nine stories and the other eight.

City leaders hope that the mall will further invigorate once-seedy Market Street and serve as a bridge between Union Square — now the city's main shopping attraction — and the grittier former industrial district south of Market Street known as SoMa, which includes new museums and hotels. If successful, San Francisco Centre eventually could be a blueprint for renewing the once-vaunted shopping district of downtown Los Angeles, experts said. But it is a bold and risky bet that residents and tourists will frequent a so-called vertical mall that goes upward instead of outward in the style of most sprawling suburban shopping centers.

"Most American consumers, save for San Francisco and Chicago, aren't really attuned to vertical retailing," said Peter Lowy, chief executive of U.S. operations for Sydney, Australia-based Westfield Group, which owns the mall with Forest City Commercial Group. "Even New Yorkers tend to not shop vertically unless they are in a department store."

Los Angeles' most recent experiment in vertical malls, the four-story Hollywood & Highland Center, was widely shunned when it opened in 2001 in part because shoppers found it difficult to navigate. The developer sold it at a loss of hundreds of millions of dollars, and the new owners have labored to make it easier to get around inside. Angelenos are expected to get another taste of vertical retailing in the $1.8-billion Grand Avenue project planned for Bunker Hill downtown that is to include a grocery store, shops, theaters and other entertainment features. Construction is slated to start next year.

But a high-end reworking of some of Los Angeles' historic department stores that have long since been turned to other uses will probably have to wait several years because downtown L.A. lacks the density of San Francisco. Not enough people live in downtown L.A. yet, and it would take a lot of new development to restore its long-lost reputation as a daytime shopping destination, said Los Angeles retail consultant Greg Gotthardt of Alvarez & Marsal. San Francisco is also hotel-rich, with about 15,000 rooms near the city center, compared with about 3,000 rooms in downtown L.A.

Nonetheless, many shoppers are ditching traditional indoor suburban malls for so-called lifestyle centers that mimic Main Street, such as the Grove in the Fairfax district of Los Angeles.

The expansion of San Francisco Centre, which cost $460 million, is part of an industry trend toward making existing successful malls much bigger by adding shops and other uses, including apartments and condos. With the new addition, San Francisco Centre has tripled in size to 1.5 million square feet.

Remodeling and ambitiously expanding malls "is clearly something that is going to continue to happen across the U.S.," said competitor Art Coppola, chief executive of Santa Monica-based mall operator Macerich Co., which is also expanding some of its malls. Retailers prefer to join proven centers, and the neighbors are less likely to object to expanding an existing center than they would to the creation of a new one. And if the properties are near public transit hubs, public officials are often quick to approve the addition of office space and residential units, Coppola said. "It makes sense because it's smart growth."

San Francisco Centre is above an underground rail station and along one of the city's busiest bus routes. Across Market Street, the city's main thoroughfare, a turntable spins cable cars around and relaunches them back up Nob Hill toward Fisherman's Wharf. "The whole mid-Market area has been difficult, but now I think it will come to life," San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom said. "It will ignite some long-range development." He said he was also looking forward to the 25 million visitors the mall is expected to attract and the estimated $18 million it should contribute to the city's general fund through taxes.

The expanded San Francisco Centre combines the original Centre, a nine-story venue that opened in 1988 with a Nordstrom store, with an aged eight-story building that once housed the Emporium. It will contain, among other things, the nation's second-largest Bloomingdale's and a gourmet Bristol Farms market. The Emporium building was built in 1896 and survived San Francisco's devastating 1906 earthquake but was destroyed by the subsequent fire. The building was rebuilt and has been a local landmark, offering through the years the city's first escalators, a circular bandstand for free concerts and a Christmastime department where only men could shop for women's gifts.

Restoring life to the cherished relic was a 10-year ordeal for owner Forest City Commercial, President Jim Ratner said. A combined project with San Francisco Centre next door made the most sense, but its owners weren't interested until Westfield, the world's largest shopping center owner, took it over in 2002. "Melding the two buildings was the key to keeping the historical architecture while giving us the critical mass to go forward," Westfield's Lowy said.

The Market Street facade renovation brought back windows and storefronts on the sidewalk that had been boarded up for at least half a century, said architect Norman Garden of RTKL, the principal design firm for the renovation. "It restores the street fabric and original intent." Bright natural light reaches most of the revamped addition through the facade windows, dome and new glass roofs, bathing floors below that open to the central core and are staggered in shape to evoke San Francisco's hilly topography. The light is a central part of the design scheme intended to coax shoppers to travel up and down several floors, which is rarely attempted in American retail centers.

"The challenge with vertical malls has always been getting the foot traffic flow worked out to attract people to each level," said consultant Gotthardt. "Otherwise you have significant dead zones and poor performance."

San Francisco Centre's multiple tiers are a gamble, Lowy acknowledged, but if the center works, the successful elements can be duplicated elsewhere. It's now one of very few vertical-style malls in the country. After today's opening hoopla, including Cirque du Soleil acrobats dangling from the high ceiling ends, San Francisco Centre will face the challenge of attracting enough of the region's demanding shoppers to prosper.

Former Emporium patron Lillian Markinson gave it thumbs up so far. "It's in good taste and not showy," said Markinson, who was there for a pre-opening tea. "It's one of the loveliest malls I have ever seen."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #548  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 7:53 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,712
Hollywood Luggage Shop Won't Have to Pack Its Bags

Owner wins his fight against the plan to raze his luggage store, so a massive development at Hollywood and Vine will be built around the 1928 landmark.

By Bob Pool, Times Staff Writer
September 28, 2006

Hollywood's luggage king refused to pack his bags and go when Los Angeles officials tried to seize his 60-year-old family business to make room for a high-end hotel development. Shopkeeper Robert Blue fought back by blasting the city's use of eminent domain with a mocking billboard atop his Bernard Luggage store on Vine Street just south of Hollywood Boulevard. Then he filed a lawsuit alleging a violation of his right to due process, and in the process became a symbol of what some residents considered Hollywood redevelopment run amok.

And on Wednesday the luggage man bagged a victory.

The city and Community Redevelopment Agency leaders announced that Blue's business will stay — and the largest commercial development in Hollywood history will literally be built around the historic 1928 building containing his valises, suitcases, trunks and travel accessories. The planned $500-million Hollywood and Vine project will include a glitzy, 300-room luxury W Hotel and 150 condominiums, 375 modern apartment units and 61,500 square feet of upscale retail space.

Tucked into it will be the Bernard Luggage building, set back from the street an additional 12 feet and restored to its original, vaguely Spanish Colonial Revival glory. Architects changed the plans for the sprawling development to notch in the building, which will be bordered on two sides by the new construction.

Blue, 46, will retain permanent ownership and use of the one-story, 5,475-square-foot structure, originally called the Herman Building. The structure cannot compete with Hollywood's more glamorous architectural landmarks like the El Capitan Theatre, Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel and Capitol Records building. But fans see it a symbol of Hollywood's golden era. It was designed by architect Carl Jules Weyl, who also drew the plans for the now-destroyed Hollywood Brown Derby restaurant next door. Weyl went on to win an Academy Award for art direction on the 1938 Errol Flynn-Olivia de Havilland classic "The Adventures of Robin Hood."

"This is a proud day for Los Angeles!" Blue shouted over the noise of a 12-story crane parked a few steps away on Vine Street. It was hoisting building materials onto the roof of a former Broadway department store building that is being converted into posh condominium units in another city-sanctioned redevelopment project.

The fate of the luggage store had become an issue of much debate in Hollywood, which is in the midst of a major revitalization and building boom. Hollywood and Sunset boulevards, both symbols of decay in the early 1990s, have seen a string of new retail and housing projects rise in the last few years as the neighborhood has become a hip destination again. But some merchants and community activists have expressed concern that rebirth has come at the expense of Hollywood's past, including several movie houses and TV studios. Preservationists have battled to save the Florentine Gardens, the Hollywood Palladium and CBS Columbia Square.

Blue credited Hollywood-area City Councilman Eric Garcetti for setting up negotiations with developers and the city's redevelopment agency that led to Wednesday's breakthrough. But he still got in a dig at eminent domain. Such government land seizure should be reserved for public projects, not commercial developments like the one that will rise around his tiny shop, he suggested. "You can't always count on a good City Council president" being there to help the small property owner, Blue said.

Before Wednesday's storefront sidewalk ceremony, Blue painted over the sign protesting eminent domain that he placed in March on the antique, iron-framed billboard on the roof of his shop. It resembled a movie poster and read: "Reverse Robin Hood Pictures Presents, 'Murder on Vine Street: Eminent Domain Kills Small Businesses.' " It listed Garcetti, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, the redevelopment agency and developers as its "stars."

"This Story Tells It All: Greed, Corruption and Gridlock," the billboard's tagline said.

"I took it down as a gesture of goodwill," Blue said.

The peaceful resolution of the dispute will allow work to begin on the Hollywood and Vine project. Jeff Cohen, senior vice president for acquisitions and development for one of the project's principals, Dallas-based Gatehouse Capital, said ground will be broken for it by year's end. "I'm very appreciative of the outcome and humbled by the experience," Cohen said of the property dispute.

Redevelopment agency head Cecilia Estolano was equally relieved. Preservation of the luggage shop building "allows us to maintain the best" of old Hollywood while bringing in the new, she said. "Those who stuck it out in Hollywood's worst days will get to benefit from Hollywood's best days."

Garcetti thanked Blue for taking his stand. "You made me grow as an elected official and as a person," he said. "Bob was standing up for his business. He will be able to keep his business here. They will build around him," Garcetti said.

Blue's supporters showed up with cameras to capture what they called a "historic moment for Hollywood." Some said they hope the agreement sets a precedent for Los Angeles redevelopment. "I'm glad they did it, however they did it," said Robert Nudelman, director of preservation issues for Hollywood Heritage.

Community activist Chris Shabel, who has long criticized the disappearance of historic buildings from Hollywood, grinned as Victoria Valentine presented a wrapped bottle of champagne to mark the preservation's success. "We'll take it," Garcetti said as Valentine puzzled over whom to hand it to.

Other property owners and business operators in the project zone will have to move, however, including billboard figure and sometime actress Angelyne. Her small office is located in the development site. Hair salon operator Vam Nguyen, who has rented space in Blue's building since 1996, said she hopes to move back into her shop after the reconstruction is complete.

And Blue — who has also retained ownership of the old billboard on his roof — said he could have space for Angelyne too. "I might put her picture right up there," he said, pointing upward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #549  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 8:11 AM
Damien Damien is offline
Cool dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA-Leimert Park & Boston-Cambridge
Posts: 404
Quote:
And I'll say at this point in time, for us in LA to be fussing over the pluses & minuses of a small luggage store in a hood long full of dives & starving shops is kind of like ppl stranded in Death Valley arguing over whether their glass of water should or shouldn't come with ice.
I think most people consider this more than a discussion about Bernard's Luggage.

Quote:
San Francisco Mall May Supply Concept for L.A.
I hope not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #550  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 8:56 AM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Excellent. So please tell us what you think could be done to better attract mom and pops into downtown LA.

I do it every day lol I contact anyone I think might be a good fit for downtown, and a lot of the times, they're mom/pop stores. I went throughout Soho in NYC and went into many different shops asking them if they were interested in expanding their business into LA. Many are interested to this day and I talk to them semi-regularly (as deals take a VERY long time to go thru---esp if they're in NYC!).

The latest business to open in downtown LA (that's mom and pop) I was directly involved with is BLENDS sneaker boutique at 4th/Main. I went to their store in Costa Mesa a couple of years ago, gave the "Brigham Downtown LA" spiel, gave them walking tours of downtown LA, and a year and half later they're now open. I had to hold their hand (so to speak) thru a lot of the process. I had to give a presentation at the Nike headquarters in Marina Del Rey to convince them to give BLENDS the sneaker contract to sell the more exclusive sneakers. It's not easy.

I am working on a few more things right now. Very exciting stuff.
__________________
DTLA Rising
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #551  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 9:23 AM
LosAngelesBeauty's Avatar
LosAngelesBeauty LosAngelesBeauty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,610
Yeah! Let's keep all the old, and junkie shops right where they are and block developments like the W Hotel!!! lol Pah leez. Ditch the PC-crap and the counterproductive principles. If the street ain't alive when they're there now, what makes them think they'll add to the vibrancy of new developments? Them blocking development is annoying and slows down LA becoming a city people actually LIKE.

Keeping the historic structure and building around it is every interesting. In fact, it might work out quite nicely. In NYC, they build around and on top of historic buildings with new ones and it provides for an interesting urban landscape. And since the Bernard luggage store ain't gonna be there forever, having the building there for a future tenant is great!
__________________
DTLA Rising
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #552  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 1:58 PM
RAlossi RAlossi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobcat
Here's the website for the "Katsuya" restaurants as opposed to the "Katsu-ya" restaurants. Same chef but different concept, apparently. The unhyphenated restaurants appear to be going after the younger, hipper crowd. Locations include restaurants in Brentwood (recently opened), Hollywood (Spring '07), Miami (Fall '07), and Downtown (Winter '08).
Thank you for the information!

But COME ON! What a damn gimmick. I hope their sushi is good, but I have a strong feeling that it won't be. Obviously, this isn't a thread about Katsuya, but I feel that this will be another Fat Fish (half-assed, poor quality, overpriced, "trendy" sushi). It will serve its purpose, I suppose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #553  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 3:18 PM
Steve2726's Avatar
Steve2726 Steve2726 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: L.A.
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by citywatch


San Francisco Mall May Supply Concept for L.A.

A tall mall must draw shoppers in and up. It could serve as a model for other cities.

By Roger Vincent, Times Staff Writer
September 28, 2006

SAN FRANCISCO — A new style of high-rise mall that may serve as a model for downtown Los Angeles and other big city centers will open its doors here today as the largest urban shopping center west of the Mississippi River. The expanded San Francisco Centre in the heart of this city's historic commercial district at 5th and Market streets combines department stores, supermarkets, movie theaters, restaurants, shops, a spa and office space in two buildings, one nine stories and the other eight.
Here are the photos of this mall from the article. I think they are pretty impressive and development like this would do wonders for downtown and hollywood.-



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #554  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 4:09 PM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,543
Today's LA Times has a picture of the new design. Seems instead of building the original design, and sticking the luggage owner in it, they are building around his building. I think it will totally screw up the flow of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #555  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 5:37 PM
Damien Damien is offline
Cool dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA-Leimert Park & Boston-Cambridge
Posts: 404
Quote:
I think they are pretty impressive and development like this would do wonders for downtown and hollywood.
L.A. needs another indoor mall like it needs a 10.5 earthquake.

Please buy The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs.

Quote:
Seems instead of building the original design, and sticking the luggage owner in it, they are building around his building. I think it will totally screw up the flow of it.
Yea, I'm not much of a fan of the design or the apparent deal.

Quote:
Yeah! Let's keep all the old, and junkie shops right where they are and block developments like the W Hotel!!! lol Pah leez. Ditch the PC-crap and the counterproductive principles.
I guess I see the issue from a somewhat different perspective than you LosAngelesBeauty and that's fine. But, what I will stress, again, is that I find it counterproductive to assume, as I see throughout the development and commercial real estate industry, that existing communities are going to roll over (or can be easily pushed over) for new dense mixed-use developments, when the new ammenties don't appropriately serve the existing residents or provide ample opportunity for local businesses/current residents to benefit.

And call me crazy, but if the private and public sector are going to spend billions on something, we might as well do it right and fix as many problems as we reasonably can along the way. Adding density through new developments in existing areas with troubled/underperforming retail economies are an opportunity to fix a hundred years of bad city planning and empower a community.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #556  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 6:03 PM
Steve2726's Avatar
Steve2726 Steve2726 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: L.A.
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
L.A. needs another indoor mall like it needs a 10.5 earthquake.
While I agree with you on this, all I am suggesting is that instead of another Grove or Citywalk, I think there is alot of potential to restore buildings downtown in a similar fashion as this project in San Francisco. And even though the Sanfrancisco Center is an indoor mall, I think it has the feel of being open to the outdoors with the huge wall of glass windows. Imagine if they were to open up Macy's plaza in a similar fashion, or the former May Co. building on Broadway-

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #557  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 6:23 PM
Damien Damien is offline
Cool dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LA-Leimert Park & Boston-Cambridge
Posts: 404
^ Of course I want the old gems like the May Co building restored. But what's wrong with putting residences on top and the retail on the bottom? (Anyone know what type of businesses occupy the building?)

I just hate hate hate indoor malls. The activity is on the street and LA has the best weather in the country. I'd much rather see 100 retail spots spread out on the street in a one block radius than in one enclosed vertical building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #558  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 6:37 PM
LAMetroGuy's Avatar
LAMetroGuy LAMetroGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 3,148
that building is not viable for residencies because the building is too deep and the inner units will not have windows. at least, that is what potential developers said and is why they have stayed away from it. I think that building would make a great IKEA or Target.
__________________
Since 1997, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper and building enthusiast communities on the Internet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #559  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 6:46 PM
WesTheAngelino's Avatar
WesTheAngelino WesTheAngelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington and Main, Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 2,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
^ Of course I want the old gems like the May Co building restored. But what's wrong with putting residences on top and the retail on the bottom? (Anyone know what type of businesses occupy the building?)

I just hate hate hate indoor malls. The activity is on the street and LA has the best weather in the country. I'd much rather see 100 retail spots spread out on the street in a one block radius than in one enclosed vertical building.

Took the words outta my mouth regarding residences on top. I think it would be way better to fit a retailer(s) on the bottom level and have residential on top rather than devote the entire space to retail.

As an aside...we're all aware of the old derelict theatres downtown. Many want to restore all of them to entertainment venues. Sounds great, but is it going to happen? I have my doubts. I work in Studio City now (driving on open road on the 101 every morning blazing by Valleyites stuck in a crawl on the other side is quite a thrill) and drive by an old threatre which has now become....yup, Barnes Noble. Perhaps that could work downtown
__________________
Drop Bush, Not Bombs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #560  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2006, 6:56 PM
SunMonTueWedThuFriSa's Avatar
SunMonTueWedThuFriSa SunMonTueWedThuFriSa is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: City of Angles
Posts: 145
Very disappointed about the news concerning the redesign of the Hollywood/Vine project. Why couldn't they incorporate the luggage store into the new building rather than leaving the old ugly one and building around it? I feel Vine is too important a street to have this kind of frontage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.