HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #541  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2015, 12:35 AM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,412
Bottom line...this project is not happening in the form currently presented!

There is no financing in place, no hotel management contract signed, and extremely questionable development experience with regard to the team engaged in this project.

I'd love for this to get cut down to two towers and one of those be in excess of 65 stories. However, that will not happen with this group as it did not happen with the several other groups which tried to develop projects on this site.

Sutton is too small and too inexperienced for something of this scope!
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 993,588 +3.30% - '20-'24 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,550,637 +11.70% - '20-'24
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,526,656 +6.41% - '20-'24 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,763,006 +8.01% - '20-'24
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,313,643 +9.75% - '20-'24 | *SRC: US Census*

Last edited by GoldenBoot; Sep 16, 2015 at 5:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #542  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2015, 12:36 AM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
McCourt had to bring in Hines to shore up his Hudson Yards project. I think McCourt's deep pocketed Guggenheim partners only got in bed with him because he retained rights to develop the Chavez Ravine area around Dodger Stadium in LA. Guggenheim probably just wants to protect their LA Dodgers investment and is not terribly interested in bankrolling McCourt. McCourt emerged from owning the Dodgers with a couple of billion bucks, but that does not go far when you are trying to swing a $3 Billion plus construction project in a place like NYC. McCourt may end up getting eaten alive since the Hudson Yard/360 10th Ave project is really his first significant development deal. I hope he knows how to swim with the sharks.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 993,588 +3.30% - '20-'24 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,550,637 +11.70% - '20-'24
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,526,656 +6.41% - '20-'24 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,763,006 +8.01% - '20-'24
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,313,643 +9.75% - '20-'24 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #543  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2015, 1:20 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,150
I wish this lot could get something similar to those two Rainey towers that were supposed to go on the Millennium lot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #544  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 8:11 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
A rare update and it's mostly good:

https://www.bisnow.com/austin-san-an...-preview-51105
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #545  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 9:42 AM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
That is good. So they say Phase 1 should be done in early 2019. Hard to believe that 2019 is only a couple of years away. I feel old.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #546  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 4:53 PM
AustinGoesVertical AustinGoesVertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
A rare update and it's mostly good:

https://www.bisnow.com/austin-san-an...-preview-51105
When I first read 2019 delivery for phase I, I was assuming that we wouldn't see much activity until early 2017, but it seems like this one will be in full swing by the summer, with demo and site prep taking place over the Winter. The Greenwater development's first three buildings (Northshore, Google Tower, and Austin Proper) will go from site prep to delivery spanning a similar three year timeline (early 2014-early 2017). I'm assuming that Waller Park Place will follow a similar process, in which one tower is ahead of the others, while the other sites are used for staging, until it's feasible to have simultaneous work on all three. Am I wrong to project that this one will HAVE to be fully underway by this summer in order to meet that 2019 opening.

Also, it sounds like that other surface parking lot Sutton owns will be Phase II, and feature mostly office like we expected. Pike says the hotel operator is lined up, so hopefully this quells a lot of people's concerns on the forum that this one would never come to fruition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #547  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 6:45 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,838
Well I'm glad something was mentioned about it. I'd still feel better about the project if they released updated renderings and such. It sometimes seems that this particular publisher and site is more of a hype driver and is obviously very close nit with these people since they post all sorts of buddy buddy hanging out kinda pics. They even casually throw into the articles that so and so is friends with Mr. Whosit and what not. I guess they could be trying to show that they are human beings like everyone else but I'm not sure it's really needed.

Still, we now have a time line and if we don't see demo start in January then we'll know this was nothing more than a publicity stunt.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #548  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 8:38 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,503
They have been talking about site prep and demolition now for over a year. This is just more talk as far as I can tell. Give me some real specifics like financing information, contracts signed with builders, name of proposed hotel operator, etc. I would just deduct the office space square footage numbers from the Waller project from that 1.6 million square feet of office space in the pipeline that is discussed in this article. The Waller square footage is just talk at this point. I have gone from being a true believer for this project and turned into a firm doubter. Sutton does not have what it takes to deliver this project, and McCourt is not really interested in going forward at the present time. Prove me wrong. I would love to be wrong about this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #549  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 10:57 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
They have been talking about site prep and demolition now for over a year. This is just more talk as far as I can tell. Give me some real specifics like financing information, contracts signed with builders, name of proposed hotel operator, etc. I would just deduct the office space square footage numbers from the Waller project from that 1.6 million square feet of office space in the pipeline that is discussed in this article. The Waller square footage is just talk at this point. I have gone from being a true believer for this project and turned into a firm doubter. Sutton does not have what it takes to deliver this project, and McCourt is not really interested in going forward at the present time. Prove me wrong. I would love to be wrong about this.

I am inclined to agree with you. As much as I'm all for highrise announcements, over the years and gained wisdom as I've gracefully aged, I'm to the point that unless we have solid evidence that all is well and that these proposals are moving forward in a timely manner with consistent updates, I'm not holding my breath.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #550  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 7:20 AM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,733
^ Yeah, it's usually dirt moving for me, but Zaza is ruining that practice as well, haha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #551  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 7:29 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
^ Yeah, it's usually dirt moving for me, but Zaza is ruining that practice as well, haha.
Right. ZaZa has been breaking ground for a year.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #552  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 9:27 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,911
At least full demolition has been complete at the ZaZa site. Nothing is going on at the Waller Park Place site.

If he has a hotel operator on board, why not just announce it...drive some interest and enthusiasm behind this project. Oh, maybe that is because the hotel does not want to be publicly tied to this project until financing has been secured?!? Hummmm...if that is the case...a tenant (or hotel operator) by contingency. That doesn't usually turn out well.

I agree with a lot of you. I think Mac Pike is in over his head on this project. Even the renderings look fake and very cheap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #553  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 10:20 PM
AusTxDevelopment AusTxDevelopment is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
^ Yeah, it's usually dirt moving for me, but Zaza is ruining that practice as well, haha.
Rumor was ZaZa lost their financing for the Austin site. Apparently they've recently found a new backer, or are very close to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #554  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 12:03 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
The writing in the Bisnow article is a little sloppy. But after reading it again, it seems that the hotel portion (along with a second office tower) is part of Phase II which is the fourth building that is planned for the vacant lot next to the IHOP.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #555  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:37 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
The writing in the Bisnow article is a little sloppy. But after reading it again, it seems that the hotel portion (along with a second office tower) is part of Phase II which is the fourth building that is planned for the vacant lot next to the IHOP.
It says the "site development for the first phase is ready." I assume this means the site plan has been approved - the site plan which is available on the COA's website. If this is the case, it includes the residential, most of the retail, 400,000 SF of office in three towers with a common base/podium structure.

Phase two will be a 600,000 SF office building...likely with ground floor retail.


*If they plan on breaking ground in 1Q2016, don't you think they would have someone lined up and marketing the for sale condo portion of this development. Unless they completely drop that portion of the project (or revert the for-sale units to rental), I would expect a financial backer would want to see a substantial amount of presales. Kind of hard to do that without marketing them.

Look at 70 Rainey, Austin Proper, The Independent, etc...they all will be breaking ground (supposedly) in the coming three-to-four months. And all of these developments have already started taking reservations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #556  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 6:15 PM
AustinGoesVertical AustinGoesVertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSAT View Post


*If they plan on breaking ground in 1Q2016, don't you think they would have someone lined up and marketing the for sale condo portion of this development. Unless they completely drop that portion of the project (or revert the for-sale units to rental), I would expect a financial backer would want to see a substantial amount of presales. Kind of hard to do that without marketing them.

Look at 70 Rainey, Austin Proper, The Independent, etc...they all will be breaking ground (supposedly) in the coming three-to-four months. And all of these developments have already started taking reservations.
You would think so, except delivery still wouldn't be until 2019 because of the scope of the project, so maybe they would really start marketing it two years out. I agree that a financial backer would like to see the presales, and correct if I'm wrong, but I think 5th and West broke ground before they really had their marketing all lined up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #557  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 7:06 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,412
As of December 2014, 5th and West had reservations for about 25% of their units (before the official ground breaking).
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 993,588 +3.30% - '20-'24 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,550,637 +11.70% - '20-'24
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,526,656 +6.41% - '20-'24 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,763,006 +8.01% - '20-'24
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,313,643 +9.75% - '20-'24 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #558  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2015, 3:35 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
Fresh demo permit requests were filed today for four of the buildings on the site. Let's get this done already. (I didn't post the links to the permits because we want action, not permits at this point.)
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #559  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2015, 5:27 AM
Tech House Tech House is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 726
Unhappy

I wonder if it would look weird to have a protest at the Waller property with people holding signs such as "Less Talk, More Action!" and chanting slogans like,
We're tired of asking for permission
We're going ahead with demolition!
and
Here's the reason why we're snoring,
Bureaucrats are fucking boring!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #560  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2015, 5:33 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tech House View Post
I wonder if it would look weird to have a protest at the Waller property with people holding signs such as "Less Talk, More Action!" and chanting slogans like,
We're tired of asking for permission
We're going ahead with demolition!
I know. It seems they have filed for demo permits for the same properties several times over the past three years.

I wasn't planning on posting anything yet because my views of the site are fleeting as I do the rush hour Cesar Chavez to I-35 connection. BUT I thought I saw some barricades preventing vehicles from parking at one of the demo sites this week. I hope to verify that this weekend.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.