HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5461  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2017, 12:35 AM
Phxguy Phxguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,136
I work for Waymo in Chandler. Highly competetive between Uber, Waymo, and Crusie all on Valley streets. All I can say is the future with self-driving cars is exciting! Check them out guys!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5462  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2017, 9:10 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is online now
self-important urbanista
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,081
I just noticed this ranking of metro areas by jobs accessible via public transit. Phoenix is not among the top 10 cities by that metric, but it is among the 10 most-improved cities. In other words, there appears to be movement in the direction of less car dependence even as the metro area continues to grow.

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2017/11/...ransit-riders/

Last edited by combusean; Nov 10, 2017 at 9:38 PM. Reason: fixed yer link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5463  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 12:46 AM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,268
Generally positive national coverage of self-driving cars in AZ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/11/t...iving-hub.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5464  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 6:57 AM
TAZ4ate0's Avatar
TAZ4ate0 TAZ4ate0 is offline
High Voltage
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tempe, Arizona (Phoenix)
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Generally positive national coverage of self-driving cars in AZ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/11/t...iving-hub.html
The article says that Phoenix is a sprawling metro of 1.4 million. Do these reporters ever check their facts? Try the fact that Metro Phoenix is at least 4.6 million or more...in 5 years minimum, it will be 5 million.

The city of Phoenix alone is now around 1.5 mill
__________________
My photos: Tempe part I Tempe part II Tempe part III

Last edited by TAZ4ate0; Nov 12, 2017 at 3:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5465  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2017, 7:18 PM
pbenjamin's Avatar
pbenjamin pbenjamin is offline
METRO: Encanto
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAZ4ate0 View Post
The article says that Phoenix is a sprawling metro of 1.4 million. Do these reporters ever check their facts? Try the fact that Metro Phoenix is at least 4.6 million or more...in 5 years minimum, it will be 5 million.

The city of Phoenix alone is now around 1.5 mill
It doesn't say metro, it says metropolis. Most dictionaries equate that word to city, not metropolitan area. 1.4 million was the 2010 census figure for Phoenix.
__________________
Paul
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5466  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 1:03 AM
TAZ4ate0's Avatar
TAZ4ate0 TAZ4ate0 is offline
High Voltage
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tempe, Arizona (Phoenix)
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbenjamin View Post
It doesn't say metro, it says metropolis. Most dictionaries equate that word to city, not metropolitan area. 1.4 million was the 2010 census figure for Phoenix.
Right on. I won't argue that. For some reason though, I interpreted it as meaning the whole metropolitan area.
__________________
My photos: Tempe part I Tempe part II Tempe part III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5467  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 1:06 AM
TAZ4ate0's Avatar
TAZ4ate0 TAZ4ate0 is offline
High Voltage
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tempe, Arizona (Phoenix)
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAZ4ate0 View Post
The article says that Phoenix is a sprawling metro of 1.4 million. Do these reporters ever check their facts? Try the fact that Metro Phoenix is at least 4.6 million or more...in 5 years minimum, it will be 5 million.

The city of Phoenix alone is now around 1.5 mill
*5 years maximum. Oops, thats what I ment.

STOOPID beer fingers.:

Don't drink and post
__________________
My photos: Tempe part I Tempe part II Tempe part III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5468  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 3:26 PM
Phxguy Phxguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,136
https://asunow.asu.edu/20171108-ariz...edium=facebook

I can understand the desire to upgrade bus stops and I'm sure these will look nicer than the ones we have now, but I'm still concerned about the lack of shade. Only when the sun is at its apogee in summer is the shade maximized. The bus stops that lack shade or even so much as a bench should be top priority.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5469  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 3:50 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxguy View Post
https://asunow.asu.edu/20171108-ariz...edium=facebook

I can understand the desire to upgrade bus stops and I'm sure these will look nicer than the ones we have now, but I'm still concerned about the lack of shade. Only when the sun is at its apogee in summer is the shade maximized. The bus stops that lack shade or even so much as a bench should be top priority.
I've always questioned this with the light rail stations as well. There have been times I've taken the light rail and had to fight to find some shade at the stations. I don't think the designers/planners really use public transit. They just make a paycheck off of thinking it looks good enough.
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5470  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 4:06 PM
Phxguy Phxguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieFoos View Post
I've always questioned this with the light rail stations as well. There have been times I've taken the light rail and had to fight to find some shade at the stations. I don't think the designers/planners really use public transit. They just make a paycheck off of thinking it looks good enough.
Public transportation users in the Valley are sorely neglected. Something so simple as to get people out of the sun...in the DESERT...apparently isn't so common sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5471  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 4:17 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is online now
self-important urbanista
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,081
The new bus shelters look better than the current ones in terms of providing shade, but I don't know if they address the biggest problem: If a bus shelter's design requires the passenger to stand inside or behind it in order to enjoy the shade, the passenger risks not seeing an approaching bus and, more importantly, having the bus driver not see him or her. This is not so much an issue with light rail because the trains stop at every station every time. With the bus, however, if the driver sees no waiting passengers, the bus will bypass the stop. I can think of times when I've waited for a bus in Phoenix and have found myself ducking in and out of the shade every minute or two just to be sure I don't miss an approaching bus. It's not clear if this new design addresses that problem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5472  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 4:20 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is online now
self-important urbanista
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
I just noticed this ranking of metro areas by jobs accessible via public transit. Phoenix is not among the top 10 cities by that metric, but it is among the 10 most-improved cities. In other words, there appears to be movement in the direction of less car dependence even as the metro area continues to grow.

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2017/11/...ransit-riders/
The Business Journal provides more coverage of these rankings. Despite the headline about being behind competitors, the article is pretty balanced.

https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/...lines-but.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5473  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 5:02 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
The new bus shelters look better than the current ones in terms of providing shade, but I don't know if they address the biggest problem: If a bus shelter's design requires the passenger to stand inside or behind it in order to enjoy the shade, the passenger risks not seeing an approaching bus and, more importantly, having the bus driver not see him or her. This is not so much an issue with light rail because the trains stop at every station every time. With the bus, however, if the driver sees no waiting passengers, the bus will bypass the stop. I can think of times when I've waited for a bus in Phoenix and have found myself ducking in and out of the shade every minute or two just to be sure I don't miss an approaching bus. It's not clear if this new design addresses that problem.
I also wonder about the design of bus stops historically. It would seem to me that they were mainly designed to keep rain and snow, not to maximize shade. Two different goals, likely need a design revolution for the desert.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5474  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 9:31 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxguy View Post
https://asunow.asu.edu/20171108-ariz...edium=facebook

I can understand the desire to upgrade bus stops and I'm sure these will look nicer than the ones we have now, but I'm still concerned about the lack of shade. Only when the sun is at its apogee in summer is the shade maximized. The bus stops that lack shade or even so much as a bench should be top priority.
I'm impressed. ABC15 also carried the story today and they were just talking about this on Mac & Gaydos.


Rendering courtesy of ASU via ABC15

From the linked ASU piece:
Quote:
Their stop looks sleek, but as anyone who has waited for a bus in Phoenix during the summer will tell you, it’s shade that counts.

Shade was the top priority. The stops also had to be ADA-compliant. Being vandal-proof was another necessity.

The stop provides shade no matter what time of day or what angle the sun is striking it. “We took inspiration from a sundial,” Fancher said. “No matter where the sun is, there will always be shade.” The team ran the design through a computer simulation of 12 hours of sun. It provides shelter at any time of day, when the sun is at any angle.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5475  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 9:46 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is online now
self-important urbanista
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
I'm impressed. ABC15 also carried the story today and they were just talking about this on Mac & Gaydos.


Rendering courtesy of ASU via ABC15

From the linked ASU piece:
I suspect the much of the audience for Mac-&-Cheese would view bus riders as barely deserving any shelter at all. (Obviously, I'm not a fan of talk radio.) As I mentioned earlier, though, I still don't see how this design solves the visibility problem. Can a passenger stay in the shade yet still be visible to the driver of an approaching bus?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5476  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 9:49 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
I'm impressed. ABC15 also carried the story today and they were just talking about this on Mac & Gaydos.


Rendering courtesy of ASU via ABC15

From the linked ASU piece:
And who says Phoenix doesn't have creative tech? Voila!!
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5477  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 9:53 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Generally positive national coverage of self-driving cars in AZ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/11/t...iving-hub.html
Nice find. That's a great article. I knew bits and pieces is all.

Related - to autonomous cars - is a fun piece I recently read in MarketWatch.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/he...ves-2017-10-24

Quote:
Since the U.S. car fleet went fully automated a few years ago, the speed limit has increased and congestion has eased, so your trip will take less than an hour. Today’s cars and trucks aren’t just faster and more efficient. Their very shapes have changed, turning them into spaces to work or rest as you travel.

They’re also safer — so much so that municipalities have cut police and first responder budgets in half. Auto insurance costs a few dollars a year. And many people now use shared “transportation as a service” networks instead of owning a vehicle, saving them thousands.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5478  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2017, 10:02 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
I suspect the much of the audience for Mac-&-Cheese would view bus riders as barely deserving any shelter at all. (Obviously, I'm not a fan of talk radio.)
Mac & Gaydos is sometimes good and not. Actually it hits the afternoon spot in doses. Good humor and 'reasonable' politics makes it a nice anecdote to the other trash. Speaking of the trash I often dose off to their repeats; it helps keep my critical thinking skills up and at may age that's a good thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
As I mentioned earlier, though, I still don't see how this design solves the visibility problem. Can a passenger stay in the shade yet still be visible to the driver of an approaching bus?
Sorry, I can't solve all your problems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieFoos View Post
And who says Phoenix doesn't have creative tech? Voila!!
Exactly
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5479  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 6:35 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,318
Valley Partnership will discuss development at airports

Curious to see what these development plans will look like and details associated with them...

https://azbigmedia.com/valley-partne...t-at-airports/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5480  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2017, 6:48 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by airomero83 View Post
Curious to see what these development plans will look like and details associated with them...

https://azbigmedia.com/valley-partne...t-at-airports/
Yeah I'm very interested in what there plans are for the former barrio area and how that will turn out.

Its interesting that they used some kind of noise zone as a way to buy out properties in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.