HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5421  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2024, 2:18 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Anthem, Polygon and Canderel push back on new Amenity Cost Charges

Quote:
The near-final approval came despite three notable developers, all with projects in Burnaby, having voiced their concerns over the introduction of ACCs, each in letters to the City.

The first is Anthem Properties, whose current projects in Burnaby include Citizen, Ethos, and South Yards, among many more.

In a letter addressed to Mayor Mike Hurley and Council, Anthem Properties' Executive Vice President of Development Rob Blackwell said Anthem had "deep concern" regarding the forthcoming changes to DCCs and the introduction of ACCs.

"From our perspective, the net result of these fee updates adds $38,841 to the cost to build a home in the City of Burnaby," wrote Blackwell. "This is a 100% increase in costs for these items as they did not previously exist. On its own this doesn't seem like a lot of money, but on a typical 300-home building this is $11,652,300! It is a lot of money, which works against the affordability of building homes. Unfortunately, this cost increase can’' be looked at in isolation, it will just be another cost added to the already very high costs of building a home in the City of Burnaby."

Blackwell notes that the current cost of building a one-bedroom, 550-sq. ft home in Burnaby is $678,056, which would be increased to $716,897 following the change. The cost of building an 825-sq. ft, two-bedroom unit would increase from $1,017,084 to $1,055,925 and a 1,025-sq. ft, three-bedroom unit would increase from $1,118,275 to $1,157,116.

Naturally, these increases will just get passed on to consumers — the basis of a long-running argument against all of these additional fees.

For renters, Blackwell notes that the $38,481 would necessitate a rent increase of $129.47 per month ($38,481/12 months x 4% cap), which would push rents in Burnaby — consistently one of the top three in all of Canada already — even higher.

"Burnaby has been a champion in addressing the housing crisis with the introduction of affordable units as a requirement of larger rezonings; however, even that is not possible with all the new costs," added Blackwell, noting that each affordable home is subsidized by the home builder at a cost of $800 to $850 per sq. ft and each rental replacement home is subsidized at a cost of $1,000 per sq. ft.

"It already does not work and by adding more costs to the overall equation, the City of Burnaby will see the number of home starts decline because projects are not economical and can not be financed any longer," he concluded. "With less supply, the cost of housing in the City of Burnaby will increase even more and become more unaffordable. All of this will completely undermine recent measures introduced by the provincial and federal governments to tackle the housing crisis and get more homes built."

In a similar letter, Robert Bruno, Executive Vice President of Polygon Homes, whose ongoing projects in Burnaby include Perla and Onyx, said the DCCs change and new ACCs "will have a significant impact on our ability to deliver housing in the City of Burnaby" if the City does not also review its current bonus density rates.

"Polygon has constructed over 4,400 homes in the City of Burnaby, with an additional 453 homes under construction and plans for an additional 1,800 homes in the near future," wrote Bruno. "The City of Burnaby was once one of the best places to do business, and the City's track record for delivering much needed housing is commendable. However, over the past years it has become much more difficult to process new development applications and building permit applications, with this additional time delay costing hundreds, if not millions, of dollars in additional holding costs."

Bruno then requested that the City complete a few additional steps before finalizing the changes, including ensuring that there is no "double counting" of fees, ensuring that ACCs will not apply to non-market homes and rental replacement homes, and considering delaying implementation for in-stream applications.

The Perla tower by Polygon Homes near Central Park in Burnaby.
The Perla tower by Polygon Homes near Central Park in Burnaby.(Polygon Homes, Dys Architecture)

The third developer who voiced concern to the City was Montreal-based Canderel, which has a 56- and 43-storey tower project planned near Lougheed that the developer referenced in their letter.

"In short, the adoption of these new rates and fees will crush the feasibility of our project going forward," wrote Sr. Director of Development & Investment Ryan Jenkins and SVP of Investment & Development Bryce R. Margetts. "When you add the adoption of these new proposed rates, this will have a direct and significant impact onaffordability of housing within the City of Burnaby and will likely result in a substantial decline in new housing supply for years. As project feasibility grinds to a halt as a result of these massive increases indevelopment fees, there is a realistic probability that should these fees become adopted, many developments will be put on hold or abandoned all together."

Jenkins and Margetts also included a chart in their letter, showing that the fees for the aforementioned project would balloon from $30,324,930 to $63,001,321 after the new changes and also factoring in the DCCs charged by the Metro Vancouver Regional District. (The latter does not come into effect until January 1, 2025.)

The letters from all three developers were dated March 15 and were follow-ups to a consultation meeting the City had with the development industry. Additionally, none of the three developers mentioned CACs (called community benefit bonuses in Burnaby), which the City has already said they will not be able to rely on as much after the change — potentially balancing out portions of the new ACCs.

During Monday evening's council meeting, councillors discussed the changes for about five minutes, but did not address the concerns voiced by the developers before voting in favor of the changes.
https://storeys.com/burnaby-accs-app...oper-concerns/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5422  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2024, 6:39 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Kwasen Village

"Our Discovery Centre is now under construction and we look forward to welcoming you for previews in late 2024."

https://aquilinidevelopment.com/comm...wasen-village/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5423  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 2:13 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,424
it's been under construction for months, the site has been mostly cleared of all trees too.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5424  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 4:19 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,633
Quote from Jollyburger:

"Blackwell notes that the current cost of building a one-bedroom, 550-sq. ft home in Burnaby is $678,056, which would be increased to $716,897 following the change. The cost of building an 825-sq. ft, two-bedroom unit would increase from $1,017,084 to $1,055,925 and a 1,025-sq. ft, three-bedroom unit would increase from $1,118,275 to $1,157,116."

https://storeys.com/burnaby-accs-app...oper-concerns/

literally wtf is happening. It costs $700K to build a 550 sqft box in the sky?
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5425  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 4:59 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
Quote from Jollyburger:

"Blackwell notes that the current cost of building a one-bedroom, 550-sq. ft home in Burnaby is $678,056, which would be increased to $716,897 following the change. The cost of building an 825-sq. ft, two-bedroom unit would increase from $1,017,084 to $1,055,925 and a 1,025-sq. ft, three-bedroom unit would increase from $1,118,275 to $1,157,116."

https://storeys.com/burnaby-accs-app...oper-concerns/

literally wtf is happening. It costs $700K to build a 550 sqft box in the sky?
Quote:
The Steller, a six-storey, 122-unit redevelopment with an integrated child-care facility, was estimated in 2020 to cost $45.5 million.

That estimate has increased by 106.4 per cent to $93.9 million.

Meanwhile, the budget for the Connection, a six-storey, 174-unit project with one in-suite daycare unit for eight children, has increased 89.5 per cent from $63.8 million to $120.9 million.
$769K and $689K for units in 6 storey townhouses..

https://www.burnabynow.com/local-new...pments-8092368
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5426  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 6:08 PM
BaddieB BaddieB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 514
My theory because there is more demand for construction, supply is not yet meeting demand and prises are soaring for construction. Hopefully construction companies can expand to meet demand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5427  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 10:09 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaddieB View Post
My theory because there is more demand for construction, supply is not yet meeting demand and prises are soaring for construction. Hopefully construction companies can expand to meet demand.
In Burnaby in the 1990s, the CMHC data shows on average there were 1,000 homes under construction at any point in time. In the 2000s that increased to 1,700, and in the 2010s there far more being built - on average 4,250 (and the number was much higher in 2019 than in 2010). So far, in the four years of the 2020s, there were 9,940 being built, (and it was 11,600 in 2023 - the highest annual average we've seen).

One reason the numbers are going up so much is that projects have taller towers, which take much longer to complete, and multiple towers in one phase, (like Gilmore) which also seem to take longer, so the number under construction gets higher. The other reason is that we're probably also seeing more projects being built (in Burnaby, at least) than at any time in the past.

Of all municipalities, (with 61,437 under construction in December 2023) Burnaby had the second highest number of units, with 11,502. Surrey had 11,151, and the City of Vancouver had by far the greatest number at 15,419 (and that doesn't include any UBC or Senakw construction).

The number of units under construction in Metro Vancouver in 2023 was over 15,000 more than two years earlier, and more than double the number in 2015. We are at peak housing construction.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5428  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2024, 11:17 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 725
In terms of "peak construction capacity", wouldn't it be better to measure from a per captia basis? That being said we are seeing a trend in the right direction overall, however I wouldn't think we're anywhere near the construction capacity of the region pre-1990s yet. We're currently on track for a 15.9% growth from 2020 to 2030 as per Metro Vancouver population projections, which is an improvement over the 14.2% growth from the 2011 to 2021 censuses, but nowhere near the 40%+ decades of population growth in the 50s & 60s. There is much more complexity in construction methods now, and land is much more constrained then it was then, I can't help but think there is some room for improvement and something in the realm of 20%+ growth rates is possible assuming construction capacity continues to increase. (I'm using population stats as an indirect way of interpreting what the construction capacity could be, there's probably more accurate data to dig up on actual unit completion rates and the corresponding size of each unit to get a better understanding of what "peak construction capacity" truly is).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5429  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2024, 12:30 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
In terms of "peak construction capacity", wouldn't it be better to measure from a per captia basis? That being said we are seeing a trend in the right direction overall, however I wouldn't think we're anywhere near the construction capacity of the region pre-1990s yet. We're currently on track for a 15.9% growth from 2020 to 2030 as per Metro Vancouver population projections, which is an improvement over the 14.2% growth from the 2011 to 2021 censuses, but nowhere near the 40%+ decades of population growth in the 50s & 60s. There is much more complexity in construction methods now, and land is much more constrained then it was then, I can't help but think there is some room for improvement and something in the realm of 20%+ growth rates is possible assuming construction capacity continues to increase. (I'm using population stats as an indirect way of interpreting what the construction capacity could be, there's probably more accurate data to dig up on actual unit completion rates and the corresponding size of each unit to get a better understanding of what "peak construction capacity" truly is).
When I said 'peak' I didn't mean it to be a statement about capacity, but rather activity. We're building more than ever, by a significant amount. Completions in Metro Vancouver in the 1950s (7,398 a year) were under a third of the 2020s (22,876 a year). As you note comparing then and now - or anything in between, is not comparing like with like - two thirds of those were single houses, while today it's less than 15% of completions. Those go up a lot faster!
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5430  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2024, 2:54 PM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,892
2024-03-28

Willingdon Lands:

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

BCIT

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

EA Campus

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

Last edited by Lexus; Mar 31, 2024 at 3:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5431  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 9:41 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,839
A few pics of Metrotown and various projects under construction






















Scroll------------------------->

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5432  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2024, 11:38 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,227
Very nice, thank you! I really like how Metrotown is evolving and feels these days. The next 5 years will be transformational.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5433  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 5:53 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Very nice, thank you! I really like how Metrotown is evolving and feels these days. The next 5 years will be transformational.
Thanks.

Yeah, Metrotown keeps pushing forward. It's looks good from the air. Lots of different architectural styles.

Here's the accompanying video from yesterday's flight.

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5434  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2024, 1:20 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Quote:
While the highrise developer Grosvenor expects to begin construction before the end of 2024, the developer told the city the timeline could change due to "a number of challenging macroeconomic forces," including rising interest rates, construction costs and inflation, which affect its ability to get financing.

That said, Grosvenor said the budget has remained the same "thanks to the collective foresight" which included planning for cost escalations.

"It remains Grosvenor's full intention to proceed as planned with the community centre, and the thousands of new, primarily rental housing units envisioned by our approved plan," the developer wrote to the city in a statement included in the staff report.

Construction on the community centre is expected to be complete in the last quarter of 2028, according to the report.
https://www.burnabynow.com/local-new...ntwood-8559872
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5435  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 5:16 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Drone footage of some of the projects underway/completed in Metrotown (warning: really bad music)

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5436  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 5:46 AM
Vantage's Avatar
Vantage Vantage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Downtown PoCo, BC
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Drone footage of some of the projects underway/completed in Metrotown (warning: really bad music)
This was just posted yesterday in this thread by the maker of the video...
__________________
Vancouver born and raised | My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5437  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 1:19 PM
CondoInvestor CondoInvestor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
From your keyboard to God's ears (....or at least the Developer's drawing boards)

(not exactly the car dealership across the street, but the former adjacent one next door (old Chrysler dealership)

Grosvenor Brentwood Site to Include 6 Towers

https://vancouvermarket.ca/2022/03/0...lude-6-towers/

FSR and early documents seem to suggest that the tallest tower could be close to 80 storeys tall (upper 70's certainly) and potentially the tallest or second tallest in the GVA, pending those Lougheed proposed Pinnacle towers)







....and the beat goes on,...and on........and on.....
Which towers will get built first?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5438  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 2:44 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Drone footage of some of the projects underway/completed in Metrotown (warning: really bad music)

Video Link

Haha. That's my video. Not a fan of synthwave, I see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5439  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 3:32 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo View Post
Haha. That's my video. Not a fan of synthwave, I see.
Sorry I think it was more that I wasn't expecting it

Really good footage though, thank you!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5440  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 3:48 PM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Sorry I think it was more that I wasn't expecting it

Really good footage though, thank you!
All good. It's an acquired taste. I find synthwave super easy to edit to, and rarely, if ever, gets a copyright strike on Youtube, so it's kinda my go-to audio.

Glad you enjoyed the footage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.