HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5421  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2025, 2:37 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 772
Pierre just announced Pre-Approved Trade Corridors. For Pipe, Rail, Wire, Road.

Basically exactly like I've been saying. Combined with the Pre-Approved "Shovel-Ready Zones" he announced prior, these are extremely strong trade and infrastructure policies. No mention of exact routes yet, but I suspect routes will be similar to this. As long as they pick nice flat topographic routes, I'm a supporter. Carney has a habit of copying Pierre's policies, so hopefully he copies these verbatim. To lock these policies in no matter who wins this election.

Because this practically eliminates red tape bullshit and land acquisition from large infrastructure projects. Making massively faster and cheaper construction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5qdzzAdoIQ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5422  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2025, 5:30 PM
EndIt EndIt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 140
Is opening interprovincial trade something the feds can actually do? It was my understanding the barriers are put up by the Provinces to protect provincial industries. Maybe the current "Team Canada" climate will grease the wheels, IDK.

In any event I wonder if Federalism will survive the Trump Era without some big changes. Even before any talk of tariffs, voters seemed to be clamouring for more federal control. Trudeau got raked over the coals for saying that housing is a provincial responsibility but strictly speaking he was right. No one's a stickler for constitutionalism in a crisis I guess lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5423  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2025, 5:49 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by EndIt View Post
Is opening interprovincial trade something the feds can actually do? It was my understanding the barriers are put up by the Provinces to protect provincial industries. Maybe the current "Team Canada" climate will grease the wheels, IDK.

In any event I wonder if Federalism will survive the Trump Era without some big changes. Even before any talk of tariffs, voters seemed to be clamouring for more federal control. Trudeau got raked over the coals for saying that housing is a provincial responsibility but strictly speaking he was right. No one's a stickler for constitutionalism in a crisis I guess lol.
I think the interprovincial trade barriers are something both the Feds and the provinces have to agree to.

In the era of Trump I think there's renewed support for a strong federal presence everywhere except Alberta and Saskatchewan. Danielle Smith has pretty clearly stated her position: the federal government of Canada is her enemy and she will oppose anything that doesn't basically give full political and economic sovereignty to the province of Alberta. She's effectively become Canada's Quisling by aligning herself with the most noxious elements of American expansionism. It will be interesting to see if she survives the next provincial election, or whether enough of Alberta has turned traitor to keep her in.

Scott Moe is a quiet Trumper. In his heart of hearts I have no doubt he wants to join Smith-Quisling in bending the knee to the orange-skinned shit-gibbon down south, but he's afraid to state it clearly. He's probably hiding under a pile of blankets somewhere hopping it will all go away.

Don't even get me started on Poilievre. The man's a bipedal rat.

I realized typing this I sound pretty angry and bitter, and I am. Internal efforts to improve our country are one thing, internal efforts to wreck our country and submit to Napoleon Bone-spur are treason, pure and simple. Sorry, IMO there's no sideline on this one.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5424  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2025, 9:17 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by EndIt View Post
Is opening interprovincial trade something the feds can actually do?
The whole "Inter-Provincial Trade Barrier" thing seems like a myth to me. Any time I ask anyone to quantify one of these so-called "barriers", no one can. They'll maybe use a liquor analogy, which is a tiny market. Or a trucking regulation analogy, which seems moot.

They're inferring that trucks can't ship nation-wide? Well that's false. Trucks currently already do. Daily. What barrier exists? And how do you remove this imaginary barrier?

National labor accreditations (doctors, nursing, engineers, etc) make sense. But this certainly doesn't make up the claimed $200B/yr of GDP these so-called barriers prevent. I dunno. It seems like everyone jumped on the trade-barrier bandwagon like sheep, without independently quantifying its actual existence first.

Last edited by bodaggin; Mar 31, 2025 at 9:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5425  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2025, 12:05 AM
zalf zalf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 867
Even the tiniest bit of curiosity would have led you to this 2016 Senate report.

Yeah, booze and trucking gets talked about because they're intuitive to people. The bigger problems that are fixable, i.e. not due to geography, outlined in the report are deficient infrastructure and that regulatory paperwork is not portable between provinces.

As it stands, a Canadian business cannot straightforwardly operate outside of its home province, so it doesn't. And if it does decide to expand, it will preferentially do so into the EU or US because that's just as much of hurdle as expanding into Saskatchewan or Quebec. So Canadian businesses remain stunted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5426  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 3:47 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 772
Canada needs a Buyer Of Last Resort program.

Because every time an economic downturn hits (2008, Tariffs, etc), the same culprit industries are begging for bailouts over and over: Lumber, Steel, and Autos. And the same silly socialist response gets proposed every time: bailouts, bridge loans, and stronger EI payments. This is stupid. The following industries should be designated as strategically important:

STEEL: Steel is a commodity with an unlimited shelf life. So if a steel/aluminum sector shutdown looms, govt would step in to stockpile common steel SKU's to keep industry running. Coordinating with large steel consumers (shipbuilders, rail, civil) should also occur. Gov can sell into the market rebound.

LUMBER: Same thing. Lumber has an unlimited shelf life. Gov can begin stockpiling finished lumber (to a limit) to bridge a lumber downturn, selling into the rebound.

AUTO MAKERS: The Canadian army has desperately outdated light vehicles. Shutting down manufacturing during this shortage, when the Silverado and Roshel Senator are MADE IN CANADA, is insane. Gov agencies should have an emergency order on standby for these downturn instances. Drop $5B or $10B to redo the whole light army fleet. Pre-engineer the vehicle before hand and setup quickly pivotable production lines with industry, to bridge downturn events. Similar can happen in the aerospace sector.

Stop pissing away opportunity please, Canada.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5427  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 4:23 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 1,786
^Good ideas, in general. I wonder how much of the content/parts of the Silverados and Roshel Senators are imported from the US and/or Mexico, or if any assembly work is done across the border?

Not sure what vehicle this infographic is showing, but you get the idea.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5428  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 5:00 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,809
Kansas City MO is the home for assembly of two Ford trucks, the F-150 and Ford Transit.

Kansas City KS is the home plant of the Chev Bold EV.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5429  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 5:10 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,332
I believe Roshel is using F550s from the plant just down the road. It's a surprisingly integrated supply chain. The Senator MRAP has its issues as a light utility vehicle but it does seem like a cool platform.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5430  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 5:31 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Authentic_City View Post
^Good ideas, in general. I wonder how much of the content/parts of the Silverados and Roshel Senators are imported from the US and/or Mexico, or if any assembly work is done across the border?
Good points. Silverados are assembled in Oshawa. I'm not certain of component breakdowns for Silverado specifically, but overall auto sector is about 50% American. That is, 50% of the parts in a "Canadian-Made" vehicle, come from USA. Of course, all is not equal. Springs, stab bars, brake cables, etc, are easily pivotable parts. A diff assembly though, that's complex and hard to pivot. Anyways, use 50% American reliance as a current ballpark.

As for the Roshel Senator, it's based off an F550 platform (very common commercial chassis). F550 is made in Ohio and Kentucky. But Roshel's modifications are done in Canada. So gov can still buy an American Chassis for now. Or, if gov wants completely repatriated production for national security reasons, tell Ford to bring a small F550 line to Canada. If Ford doesn't want to, tell GM to expand their Canadian Silverado line into HD Chassis and give them all army orders to help sustain them. Roshel can adapt, they're aftermarket.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5431  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 6:36 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,809
It's interesting that the City of Winnipeg Police did not want to spend and additional $9000 for its new Canadian made Armored Vehicle.

Instead they spend $384,450.00 with a company based in Phoenix, Arizona. As the tender was in late 2024 I didn't see any tariff cost information in it like the current tenders the city is sending out.

The last armored vehicle the WPD bought in 2016 was from a Canadian company in Ontario.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5432  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 6:52 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 1,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
It's interesting that the City of Winnipeg Police did not want to spend and additional $9000 for its new Canadian made Armored Vehicle.

Instead they spend $384,450.00 with a company based in Phoenix, Arizona. As the tender was in late 2024 I didn't see any tariff cost information in it like the current tenders the city is sending out.

The last armored vehicle the WPD bought in 2016 was from a Canadian company in Ontario.
Yeesh, too bad they went with the US manufacturer.
The first one was the Gurkha, made by Terradyne in Newmarket.

https://www.terradyneinc.com/mpv.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5433  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 7:00 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,332
Bloody waste of money
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5434  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 7:40 PM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 1,786
^true. But maybe better to waste the money in Canada, than in the US?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5435  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 9:15 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 772
FactaNV, tell me about these military vehicles. Especially the Milverado, which Canada has about 1,000 units. What does the army use Milverado's for? A general gopher? Hauling munitions? It sounds kind of lightly armored? But it's not a combat vehicle of any kind to my knowledge?

I'm trying to understand the use case here. To understand proper inventory numbers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5436  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2025, 9:58 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
Driving people around. It's a regular vehicle basically.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5437  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2025, 2:30 AM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodaggin View Post
FactaNV, tell me about these military vehicles. Especially the Milverado, which Canada has about 1,000 units. What does the army use Milverado's for? A general gopher? Hauling munitions? It sounds kind of lightly armored? But it's not a combat vehicle of any kind to my knowledge?

I'm trying to understand the use case here. To understand proper inventory numbers.
The "milverado" which we call the milcot is a non-operational admin vehicle. We use it as a runabout, for logistics on exercise, some driver training, etc. It's basically just an old Silverado painted green with a 24V power supply for comms and blackout lights. They're mainly used in the Reserves since we're extremely limited in our admin/logistics fleet. They're a lot less common in the RegF army units. They are not armed, armoured or deployable.

Useful trucks, but old and rickety and hopefully getting replaced under phase I of the LUV program this year.or next.

Last edited by FactaNV; Apr 3, 2025 at 2:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5438  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2025, 3:19 AM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
The "milverado" which we call the milcot is a non-operational admin vehicle. We use it as a runabout, for logistics on exercise, some driver training, etc.
Ok great, thanks. Order 5,000 LUV's (~$500m), and 30,000 Roshel Senators of varying platforms ($15-20B). Commas are in the correct locations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5439  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2025, 4:02 AM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 3,240
My Grandfather used to tell me how tough things were for him as a teenager growing up in the Great Depression. I recall thinking at the time "I sure hope that never happens in my lifetime."

Today is a day that will live in infamy. The Trump Administration has placed tariffs on nearly every country on Earth (except for Russia, Belarus, and N Korea). This will probably lead to a full-blown recession, and unless Trump rescinds the tariffs, will eventually morph into a full-blown depression, not seen since the 1930s.

Incidentally, the main reason for the Great Depression was....wait for it.....Tariffs! After the collapse of the stock market in 1929, the US Government implement harsh tariffs on many countries, to protect farmers and businesses in the United States. It failed miserably, and led to hundreds of millions of impoverished people Worldwide.

I pray the America people rise up, and overthrow not just Trump, but the whole Administration. This is the beginning of very hard times for us all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5440  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2025, 4:34 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
My Grandfather used to tell me how tough things were for him as a teenager growing up in the Great Depression. I recall thinking at the time "I sure hope that never happens in my lifetime."

Today is a day that will live in infamy. The Trump Administration has placed tariffs on nearly every country on Earth (except for Russia, Belarus, and N Korea). This will probably lead to a full-blown recession, and unless Trump rescinds the tariffs, will eventually morph into a full-blown depression, not seen since the 1930s.

Incidentally, the main reason for the Great Depression was....wait for it.....Tariffs! After the collapse of the stock market in 1929, the US Government implement harsh tariffs on many countries, to protect farmers and businesses in the United States. It failed miserably, and led to hundreds of millions of impoverished people Worldwide.

I pray the America people rise up, and overthrow not just Trump, but the whole Administration. This is the beginning of very hard times for us all.
It seems the US congress actually has the power to stop all Trump's tariffs if they wanted to by taking back that authority. It's more likely though that a depression will be a hard lesson for Americans, and a hard reset for the economy if it reaches rock bottom. At present no one is expecting that, but things have a way of snowballing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.