HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #521  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 2:06 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Open house boards are posted for the Marion Widening functional design. Looks pretty interesting! 5 various options. Single point diamond interchange, demolishing the neighbourhood, staying on Marion, etc. So we'll see what the public feedback is and what is the preferred approach.

Direct link to PDF's.
http://winnipeg.ca/publicworks/Major...une2014-EN.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #522  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 2:20 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Open house boards are posted for the Marion Widening functional design. Looks pretty interesting! 5 various options. Single point diamond interchange, demolishing the neighbourhood, staying on Marion, etc. So we'll see what the public feedback is and what is the preferred approach.

Direct link to PDF's.
http://winnipeg.ca/publicworks/Major...une2014-EN.pdf

....sorry, I found an existing thread for this project and put it in there.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #523  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 2:23 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Sounds good Biff, didn't know there was a thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #524  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 5:57 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
http://winnipeg.ca/publicworks/Major...ss/default.asp

Waverley Underpass site posted. Says June 2014 meeting announcement coming soon.



Red is study area, blue is intersection upgrades and orange is underpass location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #525  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 6:04 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
So the city has given up on the Sheegl route that would have put the underpass east of the existing railway crossing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #526  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 7:24 PM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,923
Can anyone comment as to what types of intersection improvements may occur for that stretch (re: waverly underpass project)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #527  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 10:40 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
There's various options being looked at for the underpass, but it will basically go "where it should". So where the road and track cross as it sits right now. The road diversion was supposed to go on the west side, track shoofly to the south. That's all being looked at vs. construction staging etc.

The intersection improvements will just be stuff like turning lanes, etc. nothing fancy. I couldn't see roundabouts going in at any of those locations. Or overpasses for that matter.

Another kind of funny point with the underpass. The fancy Piazza de Nardi sign, with the globe, is built on City property. Apparently it's going to be a big fight with the owner. But it's basically "you built your sign on my property, it's gone".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #528  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2014, 10:47 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,229
Piazza de Nardi may have a lease with the city to use that land so as long as the city gives notice as required under contract they have no recourse.

They would not be the first company to lease "banked" land from the city and have to move things because the project the land was banked for actually started.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #529  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2014, 12:52 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
Piazza de Nardi may have a lease with the city to use that land so as long as the city gives notice as required under contract they have no recourse.

They would not be the first company to lease "banked" land from the city and have to move things because the project the land was banked for actually started.
That's true, and I think you may be right now that I think of it. From what I heard, it was going to be a sore point. So could very well be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #530  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 3:20 PM
steveosnyder steveosnyder is offline
North End Troublemaker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: YWG
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
http://winnipeg.ca/publicworks/Major...ss/default.asp

Waverley Underpass site posted. Says June 2014 meeting announcement coming soon.



Red is study area, blue is intersection upgrades and orange is underpass location.
I love that both of the contacts with Dillion Construction were former City of Winnipeg employees...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #531  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 4:26 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
So the City should know exactly what they're getting then. There's really only so many companies around these parts that can handle this type of work. Seriously. Maybe I should rephrase that, there's only so many companies that are capable of this type of project. There's probably 4 or 5 and they get their share of work.

Dillon's high profile with their transitway thing. MMM does a lot of stuff, like the Marion thing. Morrison Herschfield is in on the Kenaston/Bishop fly-over, same with Dillon and Stantec. AECOM is in on a lot of these projects as well. Other than that, nobody else is qualified. Maybe GENIVAR, or whatever they're called, but there's not really too big into transportation around here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #532  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 6:13 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,955
There is also the group that built the Perimeter overpass for CentrePort Way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #533  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 6:30 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
There is also the group that built the Perimeter overpass for CentrePort Way.
SNC-Lavalin was the group that built CentrePort. The division of SNC that does road work is based out of BC. Apparently they didn't like how things went on that project and will likely not be back to this province. Don't ask for details because I don't have them. This is just from talking to people involved with the project.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #534  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 6:53 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
From what I heard, all the SNC folks were 30 years of age managers who didn't know shit. That was the problem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #535  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 7:14 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
From what I heard, all the SNC folks were 30 years of age managers who didn't know shit. That was the problem.
Could very well be. I really don't have a clue. I had heard that they were not familiar with Manitoba soil conditions which was much of the cause of the problems with the rail overpass and retaining wall on the Perimeter. They just thought because they built big projects in BC they knew what to do.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #536  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 7:16 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
I think you're pretty much on the nose there. We have an SNC office here in Winnipeg. Not sure what they really do in terms of large scale road projects. But if they brought people in from BC, I'm guessing they don't do much around here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #537  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 7:35 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
SNC-Lavalin was the group that built CentrePort. The division of SNC that does road work is based out of BC. Apparently they didn't like how things went on that project and will likely not be back to this province. Don't ask for details because I don't have them. This is just from talking to people involved with the project.
Guess that explains why CentrePort is so uneven and already in crappy condition, thought it was just a poor job.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #538  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 7:40 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Could very well be. I really don't have a clue. I had heard that they were not familiar with Manitoba soil conditions which was much of the cause of the problems with the rail overpass and retaining wall on the Perimeter. They just thought because they built big projects in BC they knew what to do.
Well maybe it's just as well they don't do anymore work here then..!

Yikes!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #539  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 7:49 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I think you're pretty much on the nose there. We have an SNC office here in Winnipeg. Not sure what they really do in terms of large scale road projects. But if they brought people in from BC, I'm guessing they don't do much around here.

The SNC we have here locally is more of a property and building owner maintenance consultant. SNC is a large company with many divisions.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #540  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 4:10 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
What a great source of information (hint don't put up a website and post links to it if there is no information)

http://transconawestroads.ca/the-project/
That site now has some stuff posted. All those roads are 2 lane paved. With two lanes future.

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.