I'm no developer, so I'm undecided as to whether the 20-50 plan was something we needed to preserve or not. Is the ability develop properties across municipal boundaries really a deal maker/breaker? It seems like it would have spread out potential developments across a wider area and just in Winnipeg, wouldn't it?
Mentally I'm also comparing this with the unpopular Pallister provincial board that gave itself the ability to kibosh civic projects. Isn't the 20-50 plan something similar, or are we looking at a different kettle of fish?
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard
"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.
"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
|