HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5261  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 9:46 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
thanks.

A lot can done on 3.3 acres
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5262  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 2:50 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,031
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5263  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 6:06 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
That looks great! This is also a great location for a tall tower, bringing variation to surrounding area skyline vs. a cluster of similar height towers at in the heart of Brentwood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5264  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 7:56 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is online now
Blazed Member - Citygater
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,349
257 rental homes to be built near Holdom SkyTrain station in Burnaby

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/5166...housing-amacon





pics from the link above
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5265  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2023, 1:12 AM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,401
2023-11-20

Riviera

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus LX600, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5266  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2023, 5:32 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,031
Burnaby Hospital redevelopment gets $4M matching donation from the Beedies


A rendering of the Keith and Betty Beedie Acute Care Tower at Burnaby Hospital. | Burnaby Hospital Foundation
https://biv.com/article/2023/11/burn...nation-beedies
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5267  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2023, 3:38 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,691
Not sure if this is new or not. Across from the Wendys on Boundary..

Quote:
CBRE Limited and TRG Commercial have been retained on an exclusive basis by the Vendor to arrange for the sale of 2950 Boundary Road, 3723Manor Street, 3729 Manor Street, and 3737 Manor Street, Burnaby, BC. The properties are being offered on an “as-is, where-is” basis, utilizing anon-priced bid process. Vendor will sign a 3-year leaseback at a rate of$500,000 triple net per annum at the Buyer’s request.


https://www.cbre.ca/people/robert-ve...lumbia-v5m-4a1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5268  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2023, 4:06 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Not sure if this is new or not. Across from the Wendys on Boundary..
https://www.cbre.ca/people/robert-ve...lumbia-v5m-4a1
The site of the 401 Inn, at Grandview Hwy.
Redevelopment would probably kill the prospect of widening the Grandview RoW through there
(with an underpass under Boundary)


https://www.cbre.ca/resources/fileas...chure_Vid2.pdf


https://www.cbre.ca/resources/fileas...chure_Vid2.pdf

Last edited by officedweller; Dec 1, 2023 at 4:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5269  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 12:29 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,691
You have to be pretty stupid to blame the lack of walkability around Lougheed Highway and Kingsway on new housing developments. I mean you could make a case that it hasn't made it that much better but it seems like a stretch to blame it on redevelopment of mostly parking lots and other underutilized land. Throw in the fact there's been minimal development along Kingsway.

Quote:
Douglas Todd: Massive Brentwood towers trigger questions about Burnaby planning
Opinion: The 40- to 60-storey modernistic towers rising up around Burnaby's Brentwood town centre are not well integrated with the community, say critics.

"It’s a faceless monolithic block to me,” says Bimal Parmar, describing Concord Brentwood's four new towers as they are seen by drivers moving west along Lougheed Highway.PHOTO BY DOUGLAS TODD /sun
ARTICLE CONTENT
Long-time Burnaby resident Bimal Parmar had a disturbing vision when he was driving west on Lougheed Highway toward Boundary Road to attend Akali Singh Sikh Society gurduwara.

As he moved in six lanes of hectic traffic under the concrete SkyTrain rapid transit line, feeling buried at the bottom of an urban canyon formed by about two dozen highrises around Brentwood Town Centre, the setting sun was creating an orange glow, which reflected off all the windows.

“It almost reminded me,” Parmar says, “of a scene from the dystopian movie Blade Runner.”

Even though Parmar, a 60-year-old software developer and house inspector, remembers the Brentwood Mall when it was the hub of a “sleepy” retail neighbourhood, he generally supports government efforts to increase housing density — to possibly help out young people struggling in unaffordable Metro Vancouver.

But Parmar worries the new Brentwood Town Centre conglomeration of 40- to 60-storey concrete highrises, most of which have been erected in the past decade, is not really connected to or serving the wider community. And it’s not creating a walkable neighbourhood.

While some new tower dwellers are obtaining panoramic views from their often-pricey condo balconies, the roughly two-kilometre stretch along the Lougheed thoroughfare is often loud and congested with cars and trucks, he says. Many towers don’t really connect to pedestrians at ground level.

The dramatic pace of construction occurring at Brentwood Town Centre recently hit home for many when a photo in the Burnaby Now newspaper was widely distributed on social media. It shows four new highrises in the process of being completed almost a kilometre east of the Brentwood Town Centre SkyTrain station and adjacent mall.

The shot, by Cornelia Naylor, shows how drivers heading west along the Lougheed Highway, near Delta Avenue, are now being confronted by four towers of 40 to 50 storeys each, which create a vast, stark wall of glass and metal.

Concord
A UBC professor laments how Metro Vancouver tower developments such as Concord Brentwood “operate as isolated real estate investment islands, poorly integrated with surrounding neighbourhoods.”sun
“What is this? It’s a faceless monolithic block to me,” Parmar says, as he stands on Lougheed Highway, gesturing toward the four new highrises.

“I was initially intrigued to see the first two towers go up a couple of years ago, since they came with a central pillar at the br,” Parmar said, noting how the towers’ architect attempted to make the soaring structures appear less overwhelming at ground level.

“But then the next towers were built and it just started looking like a fortress.”

The complex that Parmar is describing on the south side of Lougheed Highway is called Concord Brentwood. When completed, it will include 10 towers.

Already partly occupied, it is being constructed by Concord Pacific, Canada’s largest development company. It’s best-known for buying the former Expo 86 lands from the then-Social Credit government and erecting scores of apartment towers in Vancouver’s Yaletown along a waterfront promenade on False Creek.

Concord Pacific’s city-changing False Creek project has sometimes been praised for integrating a forest of apartment towers into the downtown core, contributing to a livable community. That is why Concord’s latest “master-planned” tower project has been dubbed “Yaletown comes to Burnaby.”

There are some narrow view corridors between the existing towers on Concord Brentwood’s 26-acre site, which includes partly finished concrete plazas and plans for a lagoon and park. But Parmar fears the self-contained development, with concierge service, doesn’t offer much to current Burnaby residents.

It also requires the eventual 4,600 inhabitants of Concord Brentwood, he says, to endure an 800-metre walk along a roaring highway to get to the SkyTrain station.

In addition, Parmar is among those questioning why Concord Brentwood’s often small units are on the market at more than $1,200 per square foot.

Concord Pacific officials could not be reached for comment.

University of B.C. urban landscape professor Patrick Condon says he has “long argued in favour of developments that capitalize on public transit investments. And Brentwood certainly does that.”

But the author of the book Sick City: Disease, Race, Inequality and Urban Land, adds, “I was also hoping we would get housing that was affordable for area wage earners, and was designed to integrate into surrounding neighbourhoods. I was inspired by the success of Yaletown in this regard.”

Condon believes Concord Brentwood, plus Vancouver’s vast Oakridge Park luxury condo development, “are, sadly, very unaffordable. And they operate as isolated real estate investment islands, poorly integrated with surrounding neighbourhoods.”

Concord Brentwood
A former Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. official doesn’t think the massive project emerging at Concord Brentwood much resembles its pastoral architectural renderings.PHOTO BY CONCORD PACIFIC /PNG
Vancouver’s Sean Cassidy, a former Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. official and real-estate investment banker, doesn’t think the massive buildings emerging at Concord Brentwood resemble the idyllic architectural renderings originally distributed by the developer.

And given that the City of Burnaby has zoned the Willingdon Avenue and Lougheed Highway region for ultra-high density, and its land costs are moderate compared to Vancouver, Cassidy said the $1,200-per-square-foot Brentwood units contradict those who claim mass upzoning is the route to affordability.

Article content
For his part, Parmar compares what is happening to Brentwood Town Centre to what has sprung up over the decades at Burnaby’s congested Metrotown, which has seen a giant mall and scores of highrises erected along traffic-packed Kingsway.

“Other than a busy shopping mall, Metrotown doesn’t provide many benefits to the wider community,” Parmar said. “How many people do you ever see walking along Kingsway? The mall is packed, but the street is empty. Burnaby is a suburb that’s trying to become a big city. And in many ways it’s failing.”

Despite his criticism of the way Burnaby is going, Parmar does appreciate what is happening to at least one neighbourhood. He likes the kind of moderate residential and commercial development the city’s politicians and planners are allowing to occur along Hastings Street in North Burnaby.

Expanding on the medium-density residential community that existed before, Parmar said Hastings is evolving into a vibrant streetscape for walking, shopping and enjoying a coffee.

He is not alone in wishing a similar human-scale community could emerge at Brentwood town centre
https://vancouversun.com/opinion/col...rnaby-planning
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5270  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 1:11 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,995
That 401 hotel was recently branded as a Coast Hotel after extensive exterior renovations, they had a fire there not that long ago right? which was why it to get such extensive work done on it.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5271  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 1:37 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
No mention, of course, that Dawson is planned to be the retail high street through Brentwood Town Centre.

These articles always play on the "worries" and "fears" of the uninformed everyman.

The contrdictory everyman comment is that Burnaby is failing in being a big city, yet he wants the smaller town feel of Hastings.

Downtown Vancouver 20 years ago also did not have much pedestrian traffic either around up and coming areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5272  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 1:59 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,995
the area is hardly built out yet, pedestrian activity isn't instant and judging from the traffic in the area most people in the area still prefer to drive.

As someone who needs to commute through the area daily its a pain right now, so much construction lane closures etc. yesterday it took me 20 minutes to get from Gilmore to Willingdon along Lougheed, I usually try to get onto Dawson but its been a mess with some kind of work in the street going on, I discovered today that that work is finally done and Dawson is now back to two lanes and Gilmore turning is back to normal.

Most pedestrian action in that are happens between Madison and Willingdon, many popping in and out of Whole Foods or going to the many restaurants along that stretch, the east side of Willingdon other than Brentwood really has nothing and the sidewalk and street infrastructure is frustrating as its often changing.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5273  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 5:12 PM
FarmerHaight's Avatar
FarmerHaight FarmerHaight is offline
Peddling to progress
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Vancouver's West End
Posts: 1,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
You have to be pretty stupid to blame the lack of walkability around Lougheed Highway and Kingsway on new housing developments. I mean you could make a case that it hasn't made it that much better but it seems like a stretch to blame it on redevelopment of mostly parking lots and other underutilized land. Throw in the fact there's been minimal development along Kingsway.
Maybe this guy should leave his car on Lougheed or Kingsway, and go for a walk down Willingdon. He's right: Lougheed and Kingsway are not pleasant walking environments, but I don't know many arterials that are. In my experience many pedestrians avoid West Georgia by walking on Alberni or another parallel street, despite the wide sidewalks that some stretches of Kingsway do not have.

I get some of the negativity towards condos, as they are not animated that well at street level. Maybe there is a way to fix this. But in my experience, neighborhoods with lots of tall buildings have the most vibrant cafes and parks. E.g., Coal Harbour seems pretty sleepy but the park by the Community Centre is always packed with kids and their parents. And I have never seen a day where Maywood Park off Beresford was not packed, even in poor weather.

I find it ironic that False Creek and Yaletown are held up as positive examples. Yes, they are lively but they are not "affordable for area wage earners".
__________________
“Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a bike” – John F Kennedy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5274  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 7:47 PM
griswold griswold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 169
NIMBYs living within the vicinity of Skytrain stations in shambles. Name a more iconic duo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5275  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2023, 11:52 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,538
BC Tel Boot redevelopment plans 2,500 homes incl. 975 rentals, 5 towers up to 64 storeys in Burnaby

Quote:
Burnaby’s BC Tel Boot building could be undergoing a massive redevelopment with more than 2,500 new homes.

The project is planned to include almost 40 per cent rental units.

Developer H&R REIT wants to build five towers on the properties at 3777 and 3791 Kingsway and give a facelift to the “iconic” Boot landmark.

Council unanimously gave an initial approval to the project at a meeting Monday, Dec. 11.

The master plan for Central Park Commons would be built over two phases, according to a staff report.

The first phase, Kingsway South, would be two highrise towers fronting Kingsway at 31 and 38 storeys with around 724 market rental homes.

The two towers would span Vanness Avenue and sit atop a commercial retail podium.

Phase 2 of the development, Boundary North, would include three highrise towers atop a four-storey commercial and amenity podium.

The Phase 2 towers, between 52 and 64 storeys high, would be made up of 1,559 market strata units and 252 non-market rental units (required by Burnaby policy).

The staff report noted the timing of Phase 2 is “unknown and may be impacted by market conditions,” and called the phase “more conceptual in nature.”

“Given the many years it is anticipated to complete the first phase of development, the applicant may choose to refine the mix and number of units or increase the office and retail component to better reflect market conditions,” said the report.

The report said the proposed phasing allows for the 724 market rentals to be built upfront “while preserving a degree of flexibility for the future phase.”

...
There's also talk about the developer and Burnaby wanting a Skytrain station at Smith Ave (and I think they're dreaming). Also a comment about how the mayor is unhappy about their being no public hearing due to the new provincial housing legislation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5276  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2023, 11:59 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
There's also talk about the developer and Burnaby wanting a Skytrain station at Smith Ave (and I think they're dreaming). Also a comment about how the mayor is unhappy about their being no public hearing due to the new provincial housing legislation.
Money talks, as usual.

I do feel Patterson and Metrotown are kind of odd locations for stations. Arguably they should both have been built about 150-200m further Southeast. I don't know the original reason for the specific locations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5277  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 12:13 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,691
There is no way you can do a Smith Station if you keep Patterson I assume? And even 2500 units isn't going to be enough to justify a station even with Wall's project next door.

I mean they are better off doing an overpass into the park and creating a nice walkway between Patterson and Boundary then trying to get a station built.

Burnaby wanted the two stations. The ALRT planners wanted a single station in between the two as a compromise. They thought two stations would slow the system down and require more trains to service the network.

Burnaby didn't like the compromise option. They went with Patterson to help the development of Metrotown and high density housing east of the park.

https://urbanshift.ca/wp-content/upl...in-Burnaby.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5278  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 12:33 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I do feel Patterson and Metrotown are kind of odd locations for stations. Arguably they should both have been built about 150-200m further Southeast. I don't know the original reason for the specific locations.
The Metrotown station was always intended to be right next to the mall, which it is. Patterson station was a compromise.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
There is no way you can do a Smith Station if you keep Patterson I assume? And even 2500 units isn't going to be enough to justify a station even with Wall's project next door.

I mean they are better off doing an overpass into the park and creating a nice walkway between Patterson and Boundary then trying to get a station built.
Exactly. The spacing between Patterson and Smith is even closer than Patterson and Metrotown. I suppose if the developer is willing to fully fund a Smith station and the removal of Patterson station... but even then I can't see TransLink agreeing to it.

Actually there is already an overpass from the Telus building into Central Park (it ties in with the BC Parkway). I'd be surprised if they don't include a new one with this development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5279  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 4:50 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
The Metrotown station was always intended to be right next to the mall, which it is. Patterson station was a compromise.
Sort of. It's near the mall and the library, but another 150-200m would but it dead centre of the Metrotown mall complex instead of on the corner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5280  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 6:26 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Sort of. It's near the mall and the library, but another 150-200m would but it dead centre of the Metrotown mall complex instead of on the corner.
You wrote: "Arguably they should both have been built about 150-200m further Southeast" which would put the stations closer to Imperial.

I read when it was planned as an LRT there was an idea of having it further north, which would have put Metrotown station where the mall's underground parking is now. I'd have to find that info again to see why they opted not to and used the Hydro (I think?) ROW instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:51 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.