Quote:
Originally Posted by (four 0 four)
Don't expect to see much change in this picture...

From returntoatl blog
The 'no' voters I spoke with seemed to have been more interested in staring at the inside of their intestines than trying to understand what TSPLOST was all about. Their ill-informed comments would have been comical if they weren't so pathetic. This should have been a big win for the metro region but instead all we'll end up with is more highways.
|
Let's see:
London - Population 8,278,000 - Area 1,623 Sq Km - Density 5,100 per Sq Km
Paris - Population 9,645,000 - Area 2,723 Sq Km - Density 3,550 per Sq Km
New York - Population 17,800,000 - Area 8,683 Sq Km - Density 2,050 per Sq Km
Atlanta - Population 3,500,000 - Area 5,083 Sq Km - Density 700 per Sq Km
http://www.citymayors.com/statistics/largest-cities-density-125.html
One look at the population densities tells you why your 4 maps look the way they do. After all, what came first? The density - or the transit?
I'm not saying that Marta should never expand it's rail lines, just that to do so now is not particularly cost effective. Better bus service is what the system needs now - between outer communities and not all Atlanta focussed.
TSplost went down for a lot of reasons; a couple of my main reasons for disliking it so much were the lack of real vision in the project list; so many projects were simple maintenance issues. In my view, you don't create a new tax for maintenance issues.
And double taxing Fulton and Dekalb counties - a non-starter for me. I've been paying for Marta through sales taxes for 25+ years now; and I never use it. It takes way too long to get anywhere, mainly due to the lack of bus service. And I live Intown.