"underutilized site that is in clear need of revitalization and it would be a perfect fit for an environmentally focused organization like Tesla" ...the last time I heard of any piece of land discribed as such was the Martin Marietta gravel quarries off of 130, otherwise known as the Austin Green project. A 2000+ acre piece of land that was to become master planned community with 12,000 homes. The PUD has been recommended for approval by staff but hasn't made it's way to council yet.
But of course there's no rail there...yet. With rail coming to the airport within a few years (pending voter approval), any logistics to haul supplies and vehicles to a rail yard on Burelson Rd would be temporary if they can eventually extend the line to 130. The other option is to lay down tracks north along 130 to meet up with the line in Manor.
Just spitballing. Of course "underutilized site that is in clear need of revitalization" could refer to a number of sites, including COTA, but few are as large and are within Travis county.
Quote:
Charisse Bodisch, the vice president of economic development at the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce, said her organization has had "multiple conversations" with Tesla and that the electric carmaker hasn't made a final decision about its next assembly plant.
"The potential location being explored is an underutilized site that is in clear need of revitalization, and it would be a perfect fit for an environmentally focused organization like Tesla," she said in a statement to Austin Business Journal. "We are home to a talented and diverse workforce, and we are grateful that Austin is being considered. We will continue to make the case for why this would be a win for Tesla and for our community when it comes to job creation, economic impact and workforce development."
She did not disclose the potential site.
|
https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n..._news_headline