HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5161  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 12:51 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
The problem isn't that Vancouver hasn't spent enough money or that there aren't enough grade-separation projects, it's that almost no highway projects result in a seamless, connected highway system.

For example, the SFPR isn't fully grade-separated, and at-grade intersections appear at the most annoying spots, such as the access to the Alex Fraser Bridge (aka: the Hwy 91 connector). If there should be a grade-separated interchange anywhere on the SFPR, this is it!

Then there's the 91 south from the Alex Fraser itself which hits a red light at 72nd Ave, backing up traffic. Then there's the Golden Ears bridge, where the road passes under Highway 1 without an exit forcing you to make a left turn from Pacific Highway. All of these are in greenfield sites where you don't have to do any costly expropriation or engineering work. What prevented them from building interchanges here in the first place?

What's ironic is that in most cities the bottlenecks are the bridges. In Vancouver, the bridges are often quite wide and built to highway standards and then, strangely, devolve into surface roads once you get to the ground.

I agree with the link between major roads themselves need to be improved.

Luckily two ofthe examples you used are going tobe replaced with interchanges in the near future.

72nd on the 99 looks to have a finalized design now (recent press release from the province), finally replacing that traffic light with an interchange.

On the SFPR it has also recently been announced that an interchange is being designed for the 91 connector (which I agree, should have been built in the first place).
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #5162  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 12:59 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
The problem isn't just Vancouver, it is BC on a whole.

I lived in Victoria and Highway 1 and the Inland Island Highway all should have exits, not lights!!
     
     
  #5163  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 1:10 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by srperrycgy View Post
Another video from me. Continuing on Alberta's Bow Valley Trail (Highway 1A) from Cochrane, through Ghost Lake and the Stoney FN to the Junction of Highway 1X. The highway is substandard, but the scenery is quite beautiful.
The guy in front of you for about the first four minutes of the video seemed to be having a lot of trouble staying on the road. He/she kept drifting toward the shoulder. The guy in the sports car around 2:20...what a frickin' idiot! He was just as stupid as the motorcyclists that came a bit later.

Great scenery. Keep up the good work with the videos.
     
     
  #5164  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 1:19 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I agree with the link between major roads themselves need to be improved.

Luckily two ofthe examples you used are going tobe replaced with interchanges in the near future.

72nd on the 99 looks to have a finalized design now (recent press release from the province), finally replacing that traffic light with an interchange.

On the SFPR it has also recently been announced that an interchange is being designed for the 91 connector (which I agree, should have been built in the first place).
I might be wrong but are not all of the roads you mentioned being built by the province? Vancouver city council's hatred of cars is so strong that they're blind to the need for a good road system. After losing that transit referendum you guys had last year you'd think they'd wake up and realize that people still want to drive. That's not going to change until something a lot better comes along.

As for not designing roads properly in the first place that seems to be a Canadian political tradition. Always cheap out to look good to the people who are opposed to any capital spending (other than hospitals and possibly schools) and let a future administration deal with the fixes.
     
     
  #5165  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 1:22 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,902
Well, once Canada has a national highway program like the US, then we can have a much better freeway network.

BC got the shit end of the stick when it comes to topography for building major roads.

Countless mountain ranges, large rivers, large deltas, canyons, jagged fiords, etc... Looking up to and beyond 10X the cost per km for highway in many parts of BC, and major bridges that allow major ships to pass underneath in a seismic zone are not cheap either.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #5166  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 1:30 AM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
A-85, the only controlled access highway link between the Maritime provinces and the rest of the country

Video Link
     
     
  #5167  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 1:45 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Well, once Canada has a national highway program like the US, then we can have a much better freeway network.

BC got the shit end of the stick when it comes to topography for building major roads.

Countless mountain ranges, large rivers, large deltas, canyons, jagged fiords, etc... Looking up to and beyond 10X the cost per km for highway in many parts of BC, and major bridges that allow major ships to pass underneath in a seismic zone are not cheap either.
It's an embarrassment that we don't have a national highway program like other countries do. In the meantime the feds should be giving BC extra funding to help get certain projects built that have economic significance for the nation.
     
     
  #5168  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:09 AM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 8,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
It's an embarrassment that we don't have a national highway program like other countries do. In the meantime the feds should be giving BC extra funding to help get certain projects built that have economic significance for the nation.
Same goes for Northern Ontario.
     
     
  #5169  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:11 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
Same goes for Northern Ontario.
Once you guys break free from your southern oppressors we can help you out.
     
     
  #5170  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:17 AM
srperrycgy's Avatar
srperrycgy srperrycgy is offline
I'm the bear on the right
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary (Killarney)
Posts: 1,669
What about a 2+1 (Google it) road for N. Ontario? A fully divided highway would prohibitively expensive. An alternating passing lane might work and be cheaper while letting traffic pass. Just a thought.
__________________
Stevinder.
* * * * * *
     
     
  #5171  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:20 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,900
I disagree. Why should BC get any more {or less} than any other province?
     
     
  #5172  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:24 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Building freeways where they aren't warranted is simply a waste of money. Canada doesn't have the population density to support it.
     
     
  #5173  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:34 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,591
Provinces are free to spend their Building Canada Fund grants from the federal government on highways between cities.
     
     
  #5174  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:37 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
I disagree. Why should BC get any more {or less} than any other province?
Because the cost of building one mile of freeway is not the same everywhere. Are you saying you're okay with substandard national roads in BC?
     
     
  #5175  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:40 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
Provinces are free to spend their Building Canada Fund grants from the federal government on highways between cities.
They're also free to spend those funds on other projects. We need a true national highway fund where money is allocated specifically for such projects. This would be a very easy political sale to the general public.
     
     
  #5176  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:42 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Building freeways where they aren't warranted is simply a waste of money. Canada doesn't have the population density to support it.
We've had this debate before. You act as if goods being shipped across the country can magically fly over areas with crappy roads. We need a system of freeways connecting all major economic centers.
     
     
  #5177  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:55 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
We've had this debate before. You act as if goods being shipped across the country can magically fly over areas with crappy roads. We need a system of freeways connecting all major economic centers.
And I argue that air and rail is far better for shipping goods. We need highways where they make sense.
     
     
  #5178  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 2:59 AM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 8,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
Once you guys break free from your southern oppressors we can help you out.
That would be great!
     
     
  #5179  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 3:01 AM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 8,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt18325 View Post
Building freeways where they aren't warranted is simply a waste of money. Canada doesn't have the population density to support it.
Canada certainly has the population to support one East-West freeway.
     
     
  #5180  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2016, 3:09 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
Canada certainly has the population to support one East-West freeway.
Easily. There are also good reasons why so much is shipped by trucks everywhere.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.