HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5041  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2020, 5:35 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
The exposed concrete at the underside of the form is level 21. Half the height of the building. Even with the taller, first 2 floors, the top floor will also be taller for mechanical or whatever else. So basically double the height of exposed concrete and it's taller than everything else form my view.
Oh, I'm not arguing that it's not going to be taller. I'm just saying that extrapolating and then doubling the height doesn't seem to deliver the height you'd expect.
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5042  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2020, 7:12 PM
rkspec rkspec is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 753
Doubling height from the exposed concrete looks on par to Biffs skyline pic



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5043  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2020, 8:01 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
hahaha I had a doubled height image just like yours. no need to post now...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5044  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2020, 10:54 PM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 3,036
...annnnnnnnnd new page.







__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5045  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2020, 2:02 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
You will know when they will be doing the next crane tie-in as they will have to raise the crane climbing apparatus above the 19th floor.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5046  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2020, 7:59 PM
Malcsta's Avatar
Malcsta Malcsta is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 145
does anyone know when they'll be adding more steel? or do they need to raise the crane first?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5047  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 8:26 PM
BigG's Avatar
BigG BigG is offline
Ignore these four words.
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fort Garryish
Posts: 1,110
My guess is they'll be adding another set of steel columns before the crane is raised.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5048  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2020, 8:29 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Any word on when the Earls space will be enclosed or anything move forward with that area. I haven't paid close enough attention to see if there's been any progress. The green insulating panels have crept out on the curvey bit. Not sure how long its been like that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5049  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2020, 4:52 PM
GrammarSlammerBammer's Avatar
GrammarSlammerBammer GrammarSlammerBammer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 31
This thread is great right now because my two fav topics are "When are they raising the crane" and "when is Earls moving in"!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5050  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2020, 5:16 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,810
Probably not a huge rush to close in the main floor. Earls target date is August 2021, so as long as it's closed in by winter that won't be an issue at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5051  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2020, 5:23 PM
BuildUpWpg BuildUpWpg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigG View Post
My guess is they'll be adding another set of steel columns before the crane is raised.
Certainly not much happening on site this week...they must be on a break after that great push.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5052  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2020, 8:54 PM
OTA in Winnipeg OTA in Winnipeg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Silver Heights
Posts: 1,708
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5053  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2020, 11:02 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spocket View Post
Oh, I'm not arguing that it's not going to be taller. I'm just saying that extrapolating and then doubling the height doesn't seem to deliver the height you'd expect.
I still don't see how a 40 storey residential block would be more than marginally higher than a 30-34 floor commercial office building. As I noted before, 38-storey 55 Nassau is considerably shorter than any of those buildings. I guess there could be quite a big mechanical floor at the top, though. Is there an actual height in feet (or, if we must, metres) that has been given?
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5054  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2020, 11:43 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,213
The height in this thread title is accurate.

Right to the roof. I know cuz I took it straight from the construction drawings.

IIRC the top two floors are also a bit taller than the residential floors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5055  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2020, 12:38 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
The height in this thread title is accurate.

Right to the roof. I know cuz I took it straight from the construction drawings.

IIRC the top two floors are also a bit taller than the residential floors.
Oh okay that makes some sense if there are four or five quite high floors plus maybe a bit of junk at the top that they're counting. So wouldn't that be about 50 feet higher than the highest of the other buildings -- perhaps roughly equal to those two uppermost floors plus another floor?
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5056  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2020, 12:51 AM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,798
Glazers and drywallers are holding the job up big time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5057  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2020, 7:03 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
The Trizak/Commodity Exchange Tower/360 Main is 117 m tall and the new 300 Main will be 142 m. So an extra 25 metres or 82 ft.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5058  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2020, 10:46 PM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,138
Explanation on Height re: 42 floor 300 Main Street

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
I still don't see how a 40 storey residential block would be more than marginally higher than a 30-34 floor commercial office building. As I noted before, 38-storey 55 Nassau is considerably shorter than any of those buildings. I guess there could be quite a big mechanical floor at the top, though. Is there an actual height in feet (or, if we must, metres) that has been given?
Here is the simpler way.It will be 42 floors not 40..............when 55 Nassau was built, they had 8 floor height ceilings.main floor not very high at all......These will likely be 9 ft ceilings which has become standard. Example...I am in a hi-rise from 1970 and we have 9 ft ceilings..I also believe in construction more space in height between floors..300 main = very high main floor and second floors & top 2 seem tall etc..Makes for a delicious sandwich of 465 Feet , 142 metres. Had 55 Nassau be built with this recipe, it would have been about 55 -70 feet taller making it similar to the current top 3 ...at about 432 feet.Would likely have been the tallest. Radisson Hotel, same issue..Built by standards of today instead of 83 metres / 273 feet it would have been closer to 330 to 335 feet...The average height per floor will be 11.07 feet on 300 Main as compared to 9.07 on Radisson & 55 Nassau. You will notice all new residential downtown are taller per floor than previous 1970 builds. 201 Portage used 12.85 feet average per floor. Almost a half a foot more than Richardson or 360 main did. Bell MTS Place on Main tower used 13.15 ft per floor.... Offices are almost always taller per floor, for ceiling height.

Last edited by BAKGUY; Jun 14, 2020 at 11:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5059  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2020, 1:15 PM
BigG's Avatar
BigG BigG is offline
Ignore these four words.
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fort Garryish
Posts: 1,110
It looks like the images captured haven't changed since Thursday the 11th. I wonder if it's a glitch or if the cameras are being adjusted to frame the building as it will soon rise some more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5060  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2020, 1:19 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,694
The images stopped displaying all together for me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.