Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6
I still don't see how a 40 storey residential block would be more than marginally higher than a 30-34 floor commercial office building. As I noted before, 38-storey 55 Nassau is considerably shorter than any of those buildings. I guess there could be quite a big mechanical floor at the top, though. Is there an actual height in feet (or, if we must, metres) that has been given?
|
Here is the simpler way.It will be 42 floors not 40..............when 55 Nassau was built, they had 8 floor height ceilings.main floor not very high at all......These will likely be 9 ft ceilings which has become standard. Example...I am in a hi-rise from 1970 and we have 9 ft ceilings..I also believe in construction more space in height between floors..300 main = very high main floor and second floors & top 2 seem tall etc..Makes for a delicious sandwich of 465 Feet , 142 metres. Had 55 Nassau be built with this recipe, it would have been about 55 -70 feet taller making it similar to the current top 3 ...at about 432 feet.Would likely have been the tallest. Radisson Hotel, same issue..Built by standards of today instead of 83 metres / 273 feet it would have been closer to 330 to 335 feet...The average height per floor will be 11.07 feet on 300 Main as compared to 9.07 on Radisson & 55 Nassau. You will notice all new residential downtown are taller per floor than previous 1970 builds. 201 Portage used 12.85 feet average per floor. Almost a half a foot more than Richardson or 360 main did. Bell MTS Place on Main tower used 13.15 ft per floor.... Offices are almost always taller per floor, for ceiling height.