HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 9:03 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
They have an office in San Francisco.
Yes, but those doing the Lansdowne design work from the NYC office.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2024, 3:04 AM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Luxe Office Tower

I didn't realize that it's a strata office tower.
https://luxelansdowne.com/office/

Skinnier than I expected - side loaded core.
Maybe there's some hope it'll peek above the condos.


https://luxelansdowne.com/office/location


https://luxelansdowne.com/office/location


https://luxelansdowne.com/office/floorplates-testfits
2024-03-17

The tower is at the ground level.

DSC00268 by Lexus RX350, on Flickr

DSC00269 by Lexus RX350, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2024, 4:38 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Thanks.
The balcony glass will make or break the look of the residential towers.

Last edited by officedweller; Mar 18, 2024 at 11:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2024, 9:24 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
That hotel project at 4700 No. 3 Road is up for sale

https://www.avisonyoung.ca/propertie...ment-site-sale
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2024, 1:17 AM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,401
2024-03-22

Near Capstan Station, by Sea Island Way and No. 3 Rd.


Untitled by Lexus RX350, on Flickr

Untitled by Lexus RX350, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2024, 1:37 AM
gaviscon gaviscon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 705
So looks like Viewstar's next phase is starting?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2024, 8:26 PM
teriyaki teriyaki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 580
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted May 5, 2024, 2:55 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
Don't think this one was posted.

Quote:
Richmond condo developer gets reprieve, nearly half the units remain for sale at Prima

A B.C. Supreme Court judge extended court protection on Wednesday for the troubled company behind the Prima condo development in Richmond.

Formerly known as Alfa, the 6833 Buswell St. tower consists of 109 residential strata units — nearly half of which are unsold — and 10 commercial strata lots.

Anderson Square Holdings Ltd. filed a Nov. 27 notice of intention to make a proposal to restructure under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Deloitte was appointed the trustee. On Dec. 22, Justice Michael Stephens ordered the stay of proceedings be extended to Feb. 10.

Stephens agreed to extend the stay of proceedings again, to March 26, which is also the deadline for the company’s proposal.

“The project experienced delays and cost overruns as a result of various issues including a delayed building permit, replacement of the general contractor part-way through construction and lien claims, amongst other things,” said the Feb. 6 application for another extension. “As a result, the Prima project was not completed on schedule and the residential occupancy permit was not issued until September 2022 (not April 2019 as originally anticipated).”

That resulted in several liens, including a claim from builder Scott Construction, which were cancelled by court order on Nov. 2 when Anderson Square deposited almost $5.4 million into the court as security funds.

A report to the court said that the company’s one known potential secured creditor is Anderson Plaza Holdings Inc., which demanded repayment of $64.1 million in loans last Nov. 20.

“The sale of the remaining units in the project have been slower than anticipated for a number of reasons, largely due to the rapidly increasing interest rates from April 2023 onwards that has made it very difficult for buyers to secure mortgages from the banks as they are facing greater difficulties passing the mortgage stress test,” said the court filing.

It also said the units, which have a lower per square foot price than competitors, have larger units and higher end finishings, meaning they are generally more expensive than competitors.

The company has rented eight of the units deemed affordable housing, but 48 of the one-to-three bedroom condos remain listed for sale through Re/Max WestCoast Realty for a combined total of $51.28 million.

Two additional residential units subject to unconditional sales contracts are considered sold. Two commercial units are listed for sale for approximately $4.6 million. The assets also include unsold parking spots with and without electric chargers. The company also has $17.8 million cash on hand.

Anderson Square Holdings Ltd. sought the extension in order to finalize the claims process and work with Deloitte about terms of the proposal to creditors. The filing said that Deloitte was satisfied the company is acting in good faith and would make a better proposal with an extension than if it were liquidated. It also said no creditor would be materially prejudiced by a delay.

The company is also awaiting judgment in a separate B.C. Supreme Court matter. A breach of contract trial was heard in December and January, after 37 disappointed pre-sale buyers sued Anderson Square Holdings Ltd. and directors Keung Sun Sunny Ho and Jia An Jeremy Liang in late 2019.
https://www.biv.com/news/real-estate...-prima-8295371
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted May 6, 2024, 1:02 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
The courts should not give them a “reprieve” just let them go belly up and sell off the units at prices the market will bear.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted May 7, 2024, 11:56 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
6851 and 6871 Elmbridge Way development meeting May 15

Quote:
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 21-945917

(REDMS No. 7658413)


APPLICANT:

Arno Matis Architecture



PROPERTY LOCATION:

6851 and 6871 Elmbridge Way



Director’s Recommendations

That a Development Permit be issued which would:

1. permit the construction of 376 residential units, hotel and accompanying commercial uses in a high-rise mixed use development containing three 15 storey towers at 6851 and 6871 Elmbridge Way on a site zoned “High-Density Mixed Use (ZMU52) – Oval Village (City Centre)”; and
https://citycouncil.richmond.ca/agen...524_agenda.htm

Landa Oval



https://www.landaglobal.com/commercials/oval/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted May 29, 2024, 1:06 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
The redevelopment of Duck Island seems to finally be moving along.









Quote:
Dubai developer announced as partner for approved Richmond Night Market site redevelopment into an entertainment district

Last week in a public hearing, Richmond City Council unanimously and swiftly approved the official community plan (OCP) amendments and rezoning for the redevelopment of the Richmond Night Market site at Duck Island into a “world-class” entertainment district, with hotels as the largest use.

This will be a significant project with 100% commercial uses, entailing 1.32 million sq ft of hotel uses, 910,000 sq ft of office/institution space, 540,000 sq ft of entertainment space, and 622,000 sq ft of retail/restaurant uses — all within nearly a dozen mid-rise buildings up to 12 storeys. This is intended to be a lively vibrant tourist and regional destination.
Quote:
The amount of hotel floor space slated for the redevelopment could potentially generate several thousand hotel rooms, plus supporting spaces for events, meetings, and conventions. It could become one of the largest clusters of hotel rooms in Metro Vancouver outside downtown Vancouver.
Quote:
“Duck Island has all the elements to become a leading international commercial hub and a premier entertainment complex, including multiple hotel brands that can attract business and leisure travellers from every segment,” said Matt Wehling, senior vice president, development of US and Canada for Hilton.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/rich...on-cayan-group
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted May 29, 2024, 6:23 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
I've highlighted what I think will be the night market area.
Plus maybe the big plaza in Phase 3.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted May 29, 2024, 6:28 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I've highlighted what I think will be the night market area.
Plus maybe the big plaza in Phase 3.

I'd think you're correct. Shame the plaza in Phase 3 doesn't align well, hopefully there's an indoor section of the market in the building in phase 3 that's in the way of connecting the two areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2024, 1:02 AM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
Duck Island looks very interesting, I sure hope it pans out! It's pretty ambitious, so hoping for the best!

6851 and 6871 Elmbridge hit on something I'm not keen on. The Oval District is actually insane to see, especially for a born and bred Richmond (Richmondite?) like me. I just checked Google Maps back to 2009 (the oldest they have of the area) and I was floored. And I know Richmond intimately, I am still there several days a week and all my family and a big chunk of my friends are there. Plus living there for the first 25 years of my life (I've been in Vancouver for 16 years now), and I grew up near what is now the Oval District, I was on #2 Rd just a bit further down. And yet I couldn't even remember exactly what was there before, what all of the buildings looked like (I remember some of course, but the photo was still shocking to see again). And for the most part, the new development was an improvement over the drab single story, usually under utilized properties that used to be there.

The transformation spread out from the original oval development and started changing the surrounding area too. Lost a couple small warehouses, a couple massive flooring/furniture warehouse type buildings (and likely struggling anyways), and then quite a few parking lots, a Fitness World, vacant buildings. So again, an improvement over the previous. The Epic Data and Ritchie Brothers buildings were the only new-ish larger buildings to come down I think, and even their locations made no sense, these random large buildings with fields in between on a quiet road with the waterfront right there. It was a perfect neighbourhood to flip to high density residential/retail without losing much.

But many of the commerical/light industrial/business park properties all down Elmbridge are still very much in use. Most properties look to be fully occupied with lots of activity ie. many are warehouses and always have trucks at the bays, even lots of containers backing into the bays, which suggests transloading. And the business park closest to #2 is really bustling, it houses a zillion different tenants of all kinds. There's even a restaurant in one of the business parks. So it's nothing like most of the other parts of the neighbourhood, and were mostly way under utilized. I understand this kind of presence in this area probably doesn't make much "sense" and a nice residential sweep would be more "appropriate". But this is a lot of commerical/light industrial that is very much still viable, it's tons and tons of individual businesses. It's basically forcing them to either go out of business, or struggle to find somewhere in a very tight market, especially for warehousing and transport. I know it's unrealistic, but I wish the sales contract stipulated that the residential developer buyer was required to find the commerical tenants comparable replacements without much change in rent. I think when a condo developer in Vancouver tears down an older rental in favour of condos, they have a large responsibility to displaced tenants, in terms of what they have to provide (ie. replacement rental units at similar prices, option of a unit in the new building maybe?). But I don't think anything is required when a landlord kicks of business in order to redevelop? But correct me if I'm wrong please.

But if they don't need to help or accomodate displaced commercial tenants, it's an absolute no brainer to build residential, the economics favour residential in that area. Around 8 and Blundell there's a lot of larger scale light industrial space under construction, but that is more for much larger operations like an Amazon Warehouse, or a Fedex facility, etc. The Elmbridge tenants are much smaller, more like ones who would be in projects like 8855 Laurel St.. The airport should be starting construction shortly on its business park located on Russ Baker Way between the Dinsmore Bridge and the BCIT campus. At least that's my hope, they've been busy with pre-load and earthworks over the last couple of months, so hopefully that means construction is near. But who knows, maybe they are just getting a head-start. But I feel like the rents at the new spot will be way higher than the old one being demolished. And based on the tenant directories at least, many of the business are small Asian-oriented establishments. It seems like a lot of trading/import/export kind of places, with Asian names and Chinese text. But they're not giant companies, getting evicted is likely a big deal for them, without alternatives to go to (ie. they wouldn't make sense in downtown towers) and they have strong links to Richmond. So the city should be at least working with the developer to accomodate the displaced businesses within the available space in Richmond. Any area it wouldn't matter, there's lots of business parks and light industrial in the north Richmond area, but they are leased up more or less I think, so there's probably enough slack in the overall market to accomodate some. For example, Brighhouse West Business Park (the westernmost of this commerical zone, and the largest/most individual units) is 27 acres! That's way more than just an old single storey warehouse. So ya, I really hope there is a plan for the loss of these properties, otherwise you are dooming all but the largest business to give up their commercial space, and potentially go out of business completely.

I am usually the last person to oppose increased density and urban renewal, always hated NIMBY's and excessive bureaucracy from cities. Pro development you could definitely say. But these plans gobble up a massive amount of commerical/industrial spaces at a time when there's not much out there to compensate. And the Chinese community businesses in Richmond are very connected to Hong Kong, China, Taiwan. And although you might not see them in action or in the press, these business facilitate a lot of the strong links we like to brag about in BC. So they, along with all other tenants here, shouldn't be left in the wind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 9:33 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
I'd think you're correct. Shame the plaza in Phase 3 doesn't align well, hopefully there's an indoor section of the market in the building in phase 3 that's in the way of connecting the two areas.
All of the night market corridor entrances are mid-block - not even lined up with Douglas Street.
I wonder if that will animate those frontages.
I suppose it's better than an 'X' formed by diagonal corridors from the street corners (akin to International Village, but with 2 intersecting corridors).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2024, 10:18 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Luxe

From Townline Twitter July 30th:


https://twitter.com/Townline_Homes
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2024, 4:49 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
Quote:
City Of Richmond Pays $68M For Industrial Property Valued At $32M
​The property sits at 7280 River Road, one block away from No. 3 Road and Alderbridge Way in Richmond.
Howard Chai
October 15, 2024

04:26 PM
Earlier this year, in June, the City of Richmond paid $68 million to acquire an industrial property in Richmond that has an assessed value of just half of that price, STOREYS has learned.

The property is 7280 River Road, a five-acre site located between the Fraser River and No. 3 Road, near the Dinsmore Bridge that leads to Vancouver International Airport.

BC Assessment values the property at $31,163,000. The valuation dates back to July 1, 2023, and BC Assessment valuations are not as accurate of a valuation as those conducted by a commercial real estate appraiser, but the significant gap between the BC Assessment valuation and the price tag remains abnormal.

Asked to explain the significant price gap and the plans for the property, the City of Richmond told STOREYS on October 11 that the information is "not available for public release."
https://storeys.com/city-of-richmond...80-river-road/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2024, 6:36 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
That would be a great landing point for a Dinsmore Bridge replacement connecting to Alderbridge Way (and Hwy 91).
Has anything been built on the airport side?

Apparenty YVR wants to widen or replace it according to the YVR Master Plan.
https://www.yvr.ca/-/media/yvr/docum...inal.pdf?la=en.


https://www.google.com/maps/place/72...oASAFQAw%3D%3D

Or more probably this:

Quote:
The new roadway’s southernmost end will help frame the future 37-acre waterfront Lulu Island Park, replacing existing industrial properties.
It will include large open spaces for significant public events, wetlands, and viewing areas for rowing and Dragon Boat competitions on the Middle Arm of the Fraser River.

Future plans may also include a pedestrian-only bridge over the Middle Arm between the new park and Vancouver International Airport.
https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/rich...r-parkway-road

Pedestrian bridge will be at Cambie.


https://citycouncil.richmond.ca/__sh...em_1616503.pdf

Last edited by officedweller; Oct 16, 2024 at 7:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2024, 11:44 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,674
Thind Properties Moving On From 4-Tower Minoru Square Project In Richmond

https://storeys.com/thind-properties...uare-richmond/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2024, 9:38 PM
kja384 kja384 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 230
Duck Island, Home Of Richmond Night Market, Subject Of $90M Foreclosure

https://storeys.com/richmond-duck-is...n-foreclosure/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.