HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2015, 7:51 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by ars View Post
New details on the memorial, they shrunk it down to 37% the size of the location from the 60% in the proposal

https://twitter.com/TomSpears1/statu...12053813325824
Favourite response:

"Is it small enough to fit up this government's ass yet?"

__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2015, 10:31 PM
acottawa acottawa is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
You forget what this monument is really about:

Fundraising by CPC headquarters.

They don't care about the opposition to the monument.

They don't care about any local electoral consequences: they think they can ride them out.

But dangit, they are going to fundraise the living snot out of the Chinese, Vietnamese, Ukrainian, Hungarian, etc. communities on this issue, to finance their campaigns in other ridings.
I think that is exactly the strategy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2015, 10:41 PM
acottawa acottawa is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
^ Even if it denies them re-election? In this age of social media we've already seen how you don't need a high budget campaign to win; the Alberta NDP spent way less than the PCs and yet still kicked their asses last month.
There are always huge momentum shifts (Harris in 95, Layton in Quebec, notley in Alberta) that upset the established order, but all things being equal a well funded campaign helps. Same reason wynne keeps a security risk in cabinet or Harper put duff in the senate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 1:47 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,638
NCC reveals design for smaller Memorial to Victims of Communism

Tom Spears, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 25, 2015 | Last Updated: June 25, 2015 8:31 PM EDT




Work on the Memorial to the Victims of Communism will begin this summer — only site decontamination for now, but a symbolic first shovel in the ground for a project with a lot of opponents.

But the memorial that emerged Thursday is much smaller than the 14-metre-high work that was condemned as too big. The details:

• The new proposal covers 37 per cent of the site west of the Supreme Court of Canada, down from 60 per cent. It is likely to shrink a bit more, to about 33 per cent;
• There will be five folded sheets of steel called “Memory Folds,” down from seven; and they will reach a height of eight metres, not 14.3 m.
• The foot bridge (Bridge of Hope) will be five metres high, down from 11. The proposed elevator inside it is gone.
• The whole project will be farther back from Wellington Street, “nestled” behind a natural earth berm that will reduce its impact on the street view, National Capital officials said at their board meeting Thursday. Extra trees will soften a view a bit more.
• Images will tell the story of people finding safety in Canada rather than portraying the Katyn Forest, where Soviet troops murdered thousands of Polish soldiers.

But the basic shape and theme remain the same. So too does the disputed site, because the NCC says it was asked by Canadian Heritage to oversee a design for that location, not to choose a site.

“It’s very customary to go through multiple iterations of a design” for a monument, said NCC chief executive Mark Kristmanson, adding that the Memorial to the Victims of Communisn “is still very much a work in progress.”

In 2013, federal officials announced the choice of this site, NCC chair Russell Mills said, though he said there was little controversy at the time.

“The government ultimately has the right to decide where these monuments go. They can overrule the NCC if it comes to that.”

Mills called it “a better design, much less intrusive,” adding, “I voted against it primarily because I think it’s premature to start the decontamination before we have an actual approved design.”

The final design is expected this summer.

New Democratic MP Paul Dewar accused the Conservatives of adding five Tory-friendly directors to the NCC board. The new appointments were announced Wednesday — three taking effect now and two more on July 1.

“Last night they decided to play the old game of stuffing their friends into a Crown corporation to get their way,” Dewar said. He said this looks especially bad after the Senate scandal.

“It’s old patronage politics,” he said.

He called the decontamination work “the first step toward having this monument put in place.” Dewar said the long-range vision plan passed by Parliament doesn’t have room for this monument. The plan calls for another building in what is known as the Parliamentary and judicial precinct.

And he called the memorial a “monument to irony” because the government is using heavy-handed tactics to remember the victims of totalitarian states.

Catherine McKenna, the Liberal candidate in Ottawa Centre, attended the meeting and said that “they are still going forward with the memorial in a location that people don’t want,” and as for the smaller size, “I don’t know that that changes anything.”

She blames the federal government for not leaving the NCC the option of choosing a different site. “It (the NCC) is not able to act in an independent way.”

She said there has been no consultation with the public, and even the agenda for Thursday’s meeting was kept secret until this week.

Kristmanson vigorously rejected suggestions of packing the board with Tories.

“We’re in an election season and many things are being said that defy reality,” he said. “Mr. Mills and I had met with Minister (Pierre) Poilièvre about three months ago to say that we have had members in over-hold on our board (i.e., serving past their terms’ end) for more than a year, in some cases more than two years.” There were also gaps in expertise, gender and language. “There’s no stacking of the board.

“When the chair and the CEO don’t vote the same way on a motion, it shows we have a healthy organization,” he said.

(Mills voted against starting site remediation; Kristmanson voted for it.)

Left unresolved is the question of what happens if a future government wants to put a building on the memorial site.

The NCC’s planners have already been looking at this. One option, they said at the meeting, is to wrap the new building around the east side of the memorial, so that the footbridge of the monument would form a terrace adjoining the new building.

But they say that the scaled-down plan unveiled Thursday is also small enough to fit on a smaller piece of land a little to the west of the currently planned site.

One NCC director spoke out against the choice of memorial site.

“There must be a building built on this some day,” said Norman Hotson, an architect from Vancouver. He said the whole memorial feels as if it were “plopped into a convenient location.”

The three newest board members — Basil Stewart of Summerside, PEI; Victor Brunette of Gatineau; and former Cumberland Mayor Brian Coburn — all voted to go ahead with site decontamination.

tspears@ottawacitizen.com
twitter.com/TomSpears1

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...s-of-communism
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 1:56 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,638
NCC is not master of this house but head waiter to cabinet

Kelly Egan, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 25, 2015 | Last Updated: June 25, 2015 9:09 PM EDT


The National Capital Commission does not run the capital. The NCC, at crunch time, does not even run the NCC.

It is a useful thing to keep in mind as we tumble down this rabbit hole even further, with plot twists about last-minute “stacking” of the commission’s board, and fresh correspondence that shows the siting of the Victims of Communism memorial was a secret chess game among Conservative ministers.

Ottawa has long been treated as cabinet’s sandbox. Yet do they imagine castles, of sand if not in the air.

It was evident at Thursday’s board meeting the NCC has no power to stop the memorial, only alter it.

“The proponents (Canadian Heritage) have not asked for a different site,” said NCC chief executive Mark Kristmanson, alive to the presence of protesters in the audience. “I would like to remind the board this is not our project.”

Credit to them, I suppose, for helping to scale the giant accordion-shaped monument to about half its original size, with more trimming possible. It is so scaled back, in fact, NCC staff said there is now probably room for a building on the 5,000 square metre site on Wellington Street.

It was a strange meeting, oversold as some kind of milestone in this saga. For all the sound and fury over the memorial locally, most of the board members didn’t utter a single word about the motion to approve decontamination, the first step in building. Norman Hotson, Kay Stanley, Russell Mills and Michael Pankiw all asked smart questions; the rest seemed disengaged. (Mills, the chair, voted against the decontamination motion.)

Hotson, a Vancouver architect, is familiar with the Parliamentary precinct plan, which called for a building, not a statue, on this site. “It feels a little like it’s been plopped into a convenient location,” he said, lamenting the “sea of parking” around it, detracting from the solemnity.

Outside the meeting room, Ottawa Centre MP Paul Dewar was indignant about how Conservative MPs appeared to be scheming behind the scenes, for political gain, to find a prominent location for the monument — planning be damned — even keeping Mills in the dark.

“The NCC has been handed this poisoned chalice. They should just say no.”

An apt metaphor, for has Ottawa not been fed the nectar from all its federal masters? Did Mackenzie King consult broadly with the people of Ottawa before he brought in an owl-eyed Frenchman, Jacques Greber, to fundamentally alter the face of an entire city in the post-war years?

Jean Chrétien’s government just announced one day in 2001 that, after years of meetings and aimless crayon work, the Canadian War Museum was going on LeBreton Flats, with a History Centre headed to old Union Station. John Baird renamed the NCC’s Ottawa River Parkway in a heartbeat, approved a Turkish memorial when heads were turned and, out of the blue, gave 60 acres of the near-sacred Central Experimental Farm to the Ottawa Hospital. In May, the Veterans Affairs minister announced two war memorials below the Portage Bridge, including one, for the Afghanistan mission, that Afghan vets knew nothing about.

Related

NCC reveals design for smaller Memorial to Victims of Communism

About all of this, the NCC was silent or in the background.

Remember this about the Crown corporation: at its heart, it is an agent, not a master. Its enabling legislation, in the section on “development”, spells this out: it can be over-ruled by the governing powers.

(On the subject of the new board members, the intrigue sounds manufactured: in the end, does it matter if four or five Conservative-friendly members are swapped for an equal number of other Conservative-friendlies? The NCC board, after all, approved the land-use switch to a memorial site in 2013.)

Respected Ottawa architect Barry Padolsky, a leading opponent of the plan, was not surprised by Thursday’s vote, but did point to a sliver of hope the memorial could be moved to a westerly block of empty land. He, too, talked about the political motives behind the site selection.

“What seems to have happened is that (the NCC) has become a tool of the political whims of the prime minister and a couple of his ministers, and I think that’s a degradation of their role under the National Capital Act.”

Of all the objectionable things the Harper government has done, it is strange that a pile of angled concrete has a mob at the gate, pitchforks in hand.

Is it possible it welcomes this distraction, and that NCC Minister Pierre Poilievre is not kept awake at night with location anxiety but with the next chess move that toys with his opponents?

To contact Kelly Egan, please call 613-726-5896 or email kegan@ottawacitizen.com.
twitter.com/kellyegancolumn

http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/col...ter-to-cabinet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 3:41 AM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
Favourite response:

"Is it small enough to fit up this government's ass yet?"

When in doubt: lubricate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 7:15 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 688
Looks like this one's headed to court! Update on The Citizen.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...communism-site
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 10:34 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,638
Opponents ask court to block NCC work on Memorial to Victims of Communism site

Anaïs Voski, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 26, 2015 | Last Updated: June 26, 2015 6:21 PM EDT




The Royal Architectural Institute of Canada, Heritage Ottawa, and two architects are challenging in federal court the National Capital Commission’s decision to begin decontamination of the site for the Memorial to the Victims of Communism.

The group, which includes architects Barry Padolsky and Shirley Blumberg, applied for an injunction to block further work on the controversial monument.

“Legal action was a last resort,” Padolsky said Friday.

“The reason why we’re taking it is because for the past nine months there has been an ongoing movement among Canadians who asked government to relocate the proposed memorial. But all the efforts to try to persuade the government to relocate have gone nowhere. We concluded that the only way to get their attention would be to mount a legal challenge,” he said.

The lawsuit alleges the NCC violated its procedures for public consultation and acted against the National Capital Act when it decided to prepare the site “despite having no finalized and approved design for the memorial.” According to the group, the law requires meaningful public consultation and prohibits breaking ground on a project before its design is approved.

“It is the last site available and it belongs to all Canadians,” said Blumberg, a Toronto architect who is part of the court action. “So if the government is going to change the use of it, there has to be a very rigorous and informed public consultation, but that didn’t happen.”

Blumberg was a member of the selection committee that approved the memorial’s original design, but became a vocal opponent when it was moved to its current location on Wellington Street near the Supreme Court of Canada.

“It wasn’t clear to me where the site was,” she said. “It was a little obscure. And then when I got the submissions I realized where the site was and then I became very concerned.

“I never supported a memorial in this location, ever. There should not be any monument on this site.”

The group is asking the government not to erect hoarding around the site and to refrain from breaking ground until the court hearing. If the work proceeds, the group says it “will swiftly return to Federal Court for a court-ordered injunction to preserve the site.”

While the group doesn’t oppose to commemorative intent of the memorial, it believes more appropriate sites exist.

“I’ve been an architect in the national capital for 50 years. I’m proud of this city,” Padolsky said. “In principle I have no problem with the scene or the design of the memorial. It’s just in the wrong place. This really is an arbitrary and politically driven measure that is demeaning the work that has been done for decades.”

The $5.5-million memorial was originally planned to go in the Garden of the Provinces on the other side of Wellington Street and further to the west. The site near the Supreme Court had been designated as the site of a new federal court building, part of a ‘judicial precinct.’ How and why the decision was made to move the memorial to the current proposed location has never been made clear, which is why Padolsky calls it a “mystery.”

“A couple of years ago they decided they wanted a different site and so they arbitrarily chose the current one and it’s only now we find out the steps by which that happened through Access to Information requests which have finally come through,” Padolsky said.

“We can now begin to piece together the story, and it’s not a nice story.”

The proposed memorial has been criticized for its cost, size and “brutalist” design. On Thursday, the NCC’s board of directors approved a much smaller design before giving the go ahead to begin decontamination of the site.

The new design takes up a smaller footprint — just 37 per cent of the site compared to 60 per cent in the original design — will have a maximum height of eight metres instead of 14.3 metres, and cuts the number of steel “memory folds” to five from the original seven.

Ludwik Klimkowski, the chair of the charity group Tribute to Liberty that’s behind the Victims of Communism memorial, says he has no problem with the smaller design.

“I feel great about the modified plans because we are the ones who actually suggested them,” Klimkowski said on Friday.

“To us and to me as the chair, these modified plans are a good and humble reflection of the pristine surroundings of that memorial. The plans were revised for a variety of reasons, such as to better reflect the surroundings and we also have a specific budget for the memorial,” he said.

The NCC has been doing its best to distance itself from the memorial project, referring almost all questions to Canadian Heritage, which assumed responsibility for commemorations from the NCC in 2013.

Canadian Heritage returned requests for comment late Friday afternoon in an emailed statement from media officer Catherine Gagnaire.

“This Memorial will honour the more than 100 million lives lost under communist regimes and pay tribute to the Canadian ideals of liberty, democracy and human rights. In Canada, over 8 million people trace their roots to countries that suffered under Communism. Our government committed to honouring the victims of communism in our Speech from the Throne, and we look forward to fulfilling that commitment.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...communism-site
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 10:46 PM
acottawa acottawa is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,512
If cleaning up a site before a design is finalized then there's lots of illegal construction going on (starting with the Lebretton flats).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2015, 12:35 AM
Dr Nevergold Dr Nevergold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 20,104
What? What is this?!? I don't even know if I have a comment. LOL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2015, 5:37 AM
poptronic poptronic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 23
Looks like a great skate park!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 3:02 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 688
Thanks for posting the full article rocket.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 3:03 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 688
Another article, this time on Yahoo News.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/dail...1.html#more-id
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 3:22 PM
Boxster's Avatar
Boxster Boxster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 996
The NCC is like a dog that just won't let go of the bone! (Growling dog sounds.....)


Making it smaller does not make it more right!
__________________
The Fast One!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 3:30 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxster View Post
The NCC is like a dog that just won't let go of the bone!
in what sense? what's the bone in this simile, and who is trying to take it away?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 4:36 PM
Boxster's Avatar
Boxster Boxster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
in what sense? what's the bone in this simile, and who is trying to take it away?
The bone is its plan to put the monument in that location.
__________________
The Fast One!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 5:35 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
then the dog isn't the NCC.

viz.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
[B]Opponents ask court to block NCC work on Memorial to Victims of Communism site

The NCC has been doing its best to distance itself from the memorial project, referring almost all questions to Canadian Heritage, which assumed responsibility for commemorations from the NCC in 2013.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...communism-site
and earlier

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Documents show NCC concerns about victims of communism memorial

Don Butler, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: April 22, 2015, Last Updated: April 22, 2015 6:55 PM EDT


A National Capital Commission advisory committee had specific and continuing concerns about the location and design of the controversial Memorial to the Victims of Communism, documents obtained by the Citizen show.

The advisory committee on planning, design and realty spelled out its concerns in the minutes of three meetings – released under access to information – held between February and August 2014.

Included in material released was a short email message to the NCC board from acting CEO Jean-François Trépanier dated Aug. 23, 2013 — the same day the federal government announced the memorial would be built on a 5,000-square-metre site on Wellington Street southwest of the Supreme Court and get $1.5-million in taxpayer support (since increased to $3 million).

Trépanier forwarded a copy of the government press release announcing the site and funding to the board, adding: “Despite our best efforts, we were unable to get them to use the expression ‘intended site.’ ”

Trépanier’s message suggests that the NCC — whose responsibilities for commemorations were transferred to Canadian Heritage in September 2013 — tried and failed to convince the government to be less definitive about the memorial’s location.

The chosen site had long been reserved for a new judicial building. It has since become a focus of controversy, with architect and planning organizations as well as opposition politicians calling on the government to relocate the memorial. So far, the government has shown no willingness to do so, and is proceeding with plans to built the new monument this year.

Though Trépanier’s message only hints at the NCC’s unease over the selected site, the minutes of the advisory committee of experts in real estate development, planning, urban design and architecture make its concerns explicit.

At its February 2014 meeting, the committee said the site selected for the memorial should be maintained as a building site as provided for in the Long-Term Vision and Plan for the parliamentary and judicial precincts.

If the government insisted on using the site for the memorial, there should be a “complete urban design analysis” that would reinforce the Long-Term Vision and Plan, the committee said.

“The site could accommodate a building in the future and still leave space for a monument, preferably in the western portion,” it said. “The monument should not be fronting on Confederation Boulevard in the centre of the square.”

Given the budget for the monument, the committee said, it did not need the entire space. Moreover, “the monument could be a temporary solution before a building is planned, even though it could pose problems for fundraisers.”

Finally, the language for the commemoration “should be more inclusive, evoking oppression instead of communism, which would be more relevant over time,” the committee said.

At its meeting in May 2014, the committee reiterated its concern that placing the monument on the chosen site “does not fulfil the plan for the parliamentary and judicial precincts. Building sites are scarce in the area, and using the site for a monument is not ideal.”

One member again raised the idea of relocating the monument “according to need, even if it might be challenging.”

The committee said donors’ names should be isolated from the monument, and should not be associated with the names of the victims.

Like most of the committee’s suggestions, that idea seems to have been largely ignored. The memorial’s design guidelines state that a “prominent area” on the memorial site will list the names of up to 20 donors who have given $100,000 or more.

As well, those who donate $1,000 or more will have their names, or the names of victims of communism they select, inscribed on the monument’s “Mosaic of Names.”

In August, 2014, the committee attended presentations by the six teams whose memorial designs had been selected as finalists in a national design competition.

The committee apparently shared its thoughts in some detail on each of the proposed designs, but its comments were redacted from the material released to the Citizen.

What survived was the committee’s conclusion. “Overall, members were disappointed by the schemes,” the minutes of the meeting state.

“This is an important monument, and an important topic, so the (design competition) jury has a powerful responsibility to be true to the monument and to Parliament Hill,” the committee said. “It would be advisable to seek excellence rather than respecting timelines at all costs, which would not be conducive to this goal.”

The current timetable calls for the major elements of the memorial to be completed this fall – in time for the October federal election.

dbutler@ottawacitizen.com
twitter.com/ButlerDon

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...unism-memorial
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 7:49 PM
Boxster's Avatar
Boxster Boxster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
then the dog isn't the NCC.

viz.


and earlier
You are right. Point taken.
__________________
The Fast One!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2015, 7:56 PM
Boxster's Avatar
Boxster Boxster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 996
NCC taken to court.

La saga entourant le futur Monument aux victimes du communisme vient de prendre un nouveau tournant. Un groupe composé notamment d'architectes et de l'organisation Patrimoine Ottawa entame un recours en justice contre la Commission de la capitale nationale (CCN).

LINK TO FRENCH ARTICLE

http://www.lapresse.ca/le-droit/poli...5_section_POS3
__________________
The Fast One!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2015, 2:45 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,638
A memorial to the politics of nastiness

Andrew Cohen
Published on: June 30, 2015 | Last Updated: June 30, 2015 2:31 PM EDT


So, after months of opposition and a noisy public meeting of the National Capital Commission, here is where we are on the much-maligned Memorial to the Victims of Communism.

The memorial will be smaller, about half the size and height. It will be in a less prominent place, allowing for another building.

Artistically, there will be no image of the Katyn Forest, where the Soviets murdered 22,000 Poles. Now there will be an image of Canada as a place of refuge.

Isn’t this what we call compromise in Canada, which assures mediocrity in these things, as it did in making Lansdowne Park a shopping mall? With these changes, won’t the malcontents please shut up?

Unikely. Critics of the memorial – who include the chief justice of the Supreme Court, the mayor, the opposition parties and associations of architects, designers and urban planners – remain unmoved.

Now there is a move to stop the memorial in court. The effort may fail, but it may delay the project long enough for a new government to kill it. At the very least, it will give the Conservatives a bloody nose.

Why, then, pursue this loser? Why make a national issue over something so minor? One explanation is the memorial is a metaphor for this government itself – unapologetically ideological, relentlessly political, reliably undemocratic. It just can’t help itself.

To begin, the memorial is ideological. It says that we don’t know enough about the evils of communism, as if that system was our system. It wasn’t.

The memorial is political. It appeals specifically to Poles, Ukrainians and Canadians of Eastern European origin said to vote Conservative, consolidating the party’s base.

The memorial is undemocratic. There has been no real consultation and the Conservatives have fixed the process, in league with private interests. That is also who the Conservatives are, whether it is creating a culture of secrecy in Ottawa, legislating rules around those who can vote in Canada, attacking the chief justice, undermining officers of Parliament and other Crown agencies, and proroguing Parliament.

Here, if it means packing the NCC board with five people with ties to the Conservatives, so be it. Each is or was one of the party’s donors, candidates or supporters.

(Curiously, when the Citizen asked these new directors about the memorial, they claimed ignorance, as if they were not asked their opinion when they were appointed; presumably they were.)

If flouting democracy means giving little notice of the meeting or denying public consultation, well, nothing new there, either. That is how these folks operate, and the estimable Mark Kristmanson, who runs the NCC, compromises his good name when he defends the process. That it is arbitrary and clandestine is simply the government’s way.

Indeed, it’s now their brand. It is hit-men like Paul Calandra, the Prime Minister’s Parliamentary Secretary, refusing to answer questions in the House. It is his predecessor, Dean Del Mastro, convicted of breaking the Federal Elections Act and shackled like a mass murderer (a ridiculous practice, given that he was free on bail the next day.)

It is preventing opposition MPs from visiting military bases in their own ridings and barring “Liberal” historians from attending academic conferences the government has funded.

It is the politics of nastiness and it has coarsened our conversation. It has even soiled the Office of the Auditor General, who has impugned, without foundation, the sterling reputation of Janis Johnson, the longest-serving Conservative in the Senate. The Auditor General, in his zeal to call out spendthrift senators, is now channeling Ken Starr, who overreached prosecuting Bill Clinton.

This is the climate the Conservatives have created in Canada. After 10 years, they are wearing it.

A modest prediction: the opposition party that weaves this narrative of meanness and drapes it around the Conservatives – casting them as an affront to our moderation and civility – will win the next election.

Meanwhile, the battle over the memorial – an issue that should never have been one – will simmer with unpredictable consequences. This summer, the NCC will vote on a new design. This fall, Canadians will vote on a new government. The two are not unrelated.

Andrew Cohen is author of Two Days in June: John F. Kennedy and the 48 Hours That Made History. Email: andrewzcohen@yahoo.ca.


http://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/col...s-of-nastiness
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.