HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4841  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2013, 5:20 PM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon View Post
How will the North South Taxiway be affected by the Canada Line guideway tha runs tha length of Sea island?
The Canada Line was built at ground level in that section, specifically to make the taxiway possible.
     
     
  #4842  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2013, 6:49 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 938
According to that plan, it's scheduled for 2014.
     
     
  #4843  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 2:50 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon View Post
I think the Airport authority views that as an important project but it may not needed until the terminal is expanded .

How will the North South Taxiway be affected by the Canada Line guideway tha runs tha length of Sea island?
As Zaask mentioned, it wouldn't be affected.

The reason why the North-South Taxiway was the cost and if I don't recall wrong, the cost of the project exceeded some of the runway extensions. Keep in mind, the North-South Taxiway project does add additional capacity to the airport unlike the runway extension projects. Yes, it may be a long taxi for international flights (especially US flights) to the south runway, but the times are still comparable to most large airports in the States, and the taxiways have the capacity to handle additional flight queuing. So the project will probably not be needed until we reach a point where it is economical to invest in efficiencies in our airport.

While statistically, YVR at its peak (during the summer) has more takeoffs and landings than YYZ, our traffic includes sea planes. There isn't a runway capacity issue unlike YYZ, and our airport is not rated as a slot-constrained airport by IATA/ICAO. I doubt the runway expansion projects will go ahead. If you think about it, Hong Kong and London Heathrow, is able to operate its traffic with two runways. Of course, they are capacity constrained, but they have many more times more takeoffs and landings.

I don't think capacity is a big problem at YVR for the foreseeable future: I rather see the money be invested in improving the terminals at YVR. If YVR wants to keep its Canada's Asia-Pacific "hub", it really needs to reduce the minimum time for connections between international-domestic flights. For instance, there were earlier discussions of investing in a baggage handling system that allows for international passengers to clear customs for domestic flights without having to pick up their luggage. Another example outlined in the plan is to have separate terminals by airlines rather than by destination. Currently passengers on WestJet flights connecting to International flights get the worse possible connection at YVR: almost a 500-meter connection. I believe YVRs upcoming A/B reconstruction allows for provisions for this to happen in the future, but I can't be 100 percent certain.

On the topic of airport improvements, here's a picture recently taken. I couldn't get a direct shot without getting a terrible reflection, but notice the construction fencing and the beginnings of a small crane by the A/B Pier behind the edge of the check-in terminal.

Taken By Me
     
     
  #4844  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 1:12 PM
ACT7 ACT7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post

While statistically, YVR at its peak (during the summer) has more takeoffs and landings than YYZ, our traffic includes sea planes.
Huh?? Really?? Do you have the source for that?
     
     
  #4845  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 2:23 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
I think part of the pier A\B project has to do with being able to connect and transit better from that part of the airport.

runway capacity likely won't be a problem for a while I think only about 2 or 3% of north Runway traffic are takeoffs.
     
     
  #4846  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 3:09 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,698
The North-South Taxiway hasn't been 'nixed' per se, it has just been pushed off the list of current priorities due to cost...in 2011 it was budgeted at $200 Million.
     
     
  #4847  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 3:20 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,608
They should make repaving Russ Baker Way their top priority, it is appalling. YVR is responsible for the road netwoprk on Sea Island and with the millions they rake in, they can afford to take care of it.
     
     
  #4848  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2013, 8:45 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACT7 View Post
Huh?? Really?? Do you have the source for that?
According to a member from NavCanada. Not sure if they have statistics on their website. Keep in mind, YYZ doesn't include YTZ statistics...
     
     
  #4849  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2013, 1:45 PM
ACT7 ACT7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
According to a member from NavCanada. Not sure if they have statistics on their website. Keep in mind, YYZ doesn't include YTZ statistics...
True, but it's still surprising since YYZ's movements are 430Kish and YVR's are 300Kish. (that's total terminal and non-terminal movements). YTZ is a whole other ball of wax. Plus YVR has not hit its 2008 peak movements since that time. I'd be interested in seeing NavCanada's stats on that if they have them available.
     
     
  #4850  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2013, 9:43 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACT7 View Post
True, but it's still surprising since YYZ's movements are 430Kish and YVR's are 300Kish. (that's total terminal and non-terminal movements). YTZ is a whole other ball of wax. Plus YVR has not hit its 2008 peak movements since that time. I'd be interested in seeing NavCanada's stats on that if they have them available.
I was also surprised when I found out but I guess I'll take his word for it. Even if stats were found (there were stats on YVRs site), it doesn't break it down far enough to each particular month, and in this case, we need to find each individual day during the peak season.
     
     
  #4851  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2013, 1:44 AM
ACT7 ACT7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by deasine View Post
I was also surprised when I found out but I guess I'll take his word for it. Even if stats were found (there were stats on YVRs site), it doesn't break it down far enough to each particular month, and in this case, we need to find each individual day during the peak season.
Good point. I know CAPA shows this information (and used to show it for free) but now a membership is over $200/mo. Not worth it. Although, when I did have access to it, I remember looking at peak movements for YVR, YYC, YYZ, and YUL, and YYZ always seemed like the highest each month, as well as each hour of the day (which is how CAPA broke it down). Oh well, no biggie.
     
     
  #4852  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2013, 4:46 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon View Post
I think the Airport authority views that as an important project but it may not needed until the terminal is expanded .

How will the North South Taxiway be affected by the Canada Line guideway tha runs tha length of Sea island?
It won't be.The Canada line was specifically designed to accommodate a North South taxiway.

When initially proposed, the entire Canada Line guideway was elevated on Sea Island. The airport requested a portion to be be built at grade so the N/S elevated taxiway would have no issues clearing it.
     
     
  #4853  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2013, 10:35 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,463
UA summer changes

UA has just updated its summer scheds.

A total mish mash of equipment and frequencies but overall looks like each route will have more capacity and/or frequency than the last sched upload and compared to last summer. Sundays will have 21 flights departing with a wide mix of equipment including Express and mainline.

Changes noted:

IAH: the daily 11:37 flight being upgauged to 757 on both Sat and Sun. Remaining flights a dogs breakfast including 319, 320, 738 and 739.
DEN: a 4th frequency being added on Sat and Sun. Equipment a mix of CR7, 73G, 319 and 320
ORD: equipment a real mish mash of 319, 320, 73G, 738 and 739.
SFO: a 6th frequency being added on Sundays. Equipment a mix of CRJ, 319, 320, 738 and 752
EWR: daily flight upgauged to a 752 on Saturdays. Remaining are 319.
IAD: the 2 weekly flights are now 320
LAX: remains 1 daily CR7

Edit: these changes are for July only at this stage.

Last edited by Johnny Aussie; Apr 9, 2013 at 12:01 PM.
     
     
  #4854  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2013, 12:35 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Reports that the Hudsons Bay at YVR-international terminal is now open (via Retail Insider's Facebook Page).
     
     
  #4855  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2013, 3:37 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
the Q400 can use a jetway the regular front left door .
     
     
  #4856  
Old Posted May 8, 2013, 8:45 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
Does anybody have any updates or has seen the progress of the pier A\B renovations?
     
     
  #4857  
Old Posted May 8, 2013, 8:57 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,075
The latest terminal map removed gate A1 and added A6, A7.
     
     
  #4858  
Old Posted May 8, 2013, 9:13 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
They have 2 different versions of the terminal map on their website. The domestic terminal map hasn't been updated yet, Gates A 6 & A7 will probably be West Jet Encore's gates with out A1 they could add an extra gate the the updated B Pier.
     
     
  #4859  
Old Posted May 9, 2013, 5:03 AM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
thats correct about 6/7 being for Encore; the airport project for this section is calledc "Commuter Pier". But in regards to replacing A1, the AB link building will actually add 3 more gates to the combined AB Pier, so the net result is 2 addition gates
     
     
  #4860  
Old Posted May 9, 2013, 7:27 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Is there a link to this, or a diagram of this anywhere?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:16 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.