HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #461  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 5:08 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
Yep, in rare form I agree with the Alderman on this one.

Sterling Bay has developed a bit of a hubris of late, and I'm glad that they have to contend with the reality of building within a Democracy.

Not that I agree with the NIMBYs's reasons--those buttwads just care about parking and congestion, the worthless ants that they are.

My issue is how Live Nation will cannibalize Chicago's smaller venues, many of which are within historic buildings that cities like Phoenix and Dallas only dreamed that they could ever have. I'd like to see the Congress, and the Uptown Theaters, and other deteriorating classic venues thriving to their capacity, before the city even thinks about putting in a brand new entertainment arena surrounded by acres of concrete.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #462  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 5:38 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post

My issue is how Live Nation will cannibalize Chicago's smaller venues, many of which are within historic buildings that cities like Phoenix and Dallas only dreamed that they could ever have. I'd like to see the Congress, and the Uptown Theaters, and other deteriorating classic venues thriving to their capacity, before the city even thinks about putting in a brand new entertainment arena surrounded by acres of concrete.
Agree 100%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #463  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 5:45 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,110
yeah, i don't think many people are going to lament Live Nation's cannibalistic monopoly-grab being kicked to the curb.

the soccer stadium is more meh. i would like the fire to get back into city limits eventually and i had a faint hope that maybe they could go to the LY stadium whenever they find a way to wiggle out of their toyota park contract, but if it's not to be, no big loss.

this is chicago; only major leagues need apply.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #464  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 5:57 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisvfr800i View Post
"The tallest of them would rise to 650 feet instead of the gasp-inducing 818 feet that the firm and its architects, the Chicago office of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, proposed in July.
The neighbors have every reason to be concerned. A 650-foot tower wouldn’t just loom menacingly over the little shops of the Armitage retail strip. It even would be out of scale with Lincoln Park’s tall buildings, which line the western edge of the park from which the neighborhood takes its name."

This guy is a gasp-inducing menace!!
Kamin gets a bit too much derision on this forum at times, in my opinion, but holy smokes does he deserve every bit of ridicule one can throw for highlighting the importance of some arbitrary adherence that any Lincoln Yards high-rises need be kept at the same height and compliment lakefront high-rises in LP almost 1.5 miles away.

Those two areas have the feeling of completely different neighborhoods in style and function from each other.

.....The whole soccer stadium idea always did seem a bit of an odd plan to me. So much valuable high profile space devoted to a sports stadium for a minor league sport that is 5th most popular in the country. I hope they can find some quasi-public institution or landmark to attract people to that parcel but a soccer stadium just seemed an awkward attempt to do it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #465  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 6:07 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
This is a major step in the right direction for the development, but I'm still a no on the project. If I had to choose between this one and the 78, I choose the 78 100 times out of 100 times I'm asked.
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #466  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 6:18 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
This is a major step in the right direction for the development, but I'm still a no on the project. If I had to choose between this one and the 78, I choose the 78 100 times out of 100 times I'm asked.
Why are you against he project? What do you think should be on this prime real estate?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #467  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 6:25 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,484
On one hand, yes, fuck Live Nation.
On the other, SB paid the city $100M+ for the 2FM site and are now being told by a city official to build a park there. How does work?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #468  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2019, 7:02 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
yeah, i don't think many people are going to lament Live Nation's cannibalistic monopoly-grab being kicked to the curb.

the soccer stadium is more meh. i would like the fire to get back into city limits eventually and i had a faint hope that maybe they could go to the LY stadium whenever they find a way to wiggle out of their toyota park contract, but if it's not to be, no big loss.

this is chicago; only major leagues need apply.
I want the Fire back in the city as well, but this ain't the place to do it and the Fire's long-term contract with Bridgeview makes all this discussion very premature. In 10-15 years when the Fire are approaching the end of their contract, they should absolutely look at city sites... I'd love to see it off the Orange Line somewhere, there are vast brownfields around the Halsted and Ashland stops where an MLS stadium would fit nicely while still preserving access to their SW Side Latino fanbase. Ashland maybe better because it has a ramp to I-55 already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
On one hand, yes, fuck Live Nation.
On the other, SB paid the city $100M+ for the 2FM site and are now being told by a city official to build a park there. How does work?
You know how FAR works, right? Just because a portion of the site is parkland doesn't necessarily mean the developer needs to lose overall square footage.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #469  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2019, 4:46 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
You know how FAR works, right? Just because a portion of the site is parkland doesn't necessarily mean the developer needs to lose overall square footage.
True, although I thought SB was filing two separate PDs for LY north and south? Could they shuffle FAR from one to the other?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #470  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2019, 5:51 PM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
True, although I thought SB was filing two separate PDs for LY north and south? Could they shuffle FAR from one to the other?
No they can't.
But the stadium is not the only thing in LYsouth.
Open air stadiums consume negligible FAR.
Since the PD documents are essentially blank, it's floor area could be built elsewhere or even in the same location with a smaller footprint without even altering the application.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #471  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2019, 7:13 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,442
There's lots of ways to skin the cat and mix profitable development with open space. Maybe you could stack 2-3 artificial-turf soccer fields on top of a retail power center ala Southgate Market, with parking on a sunken ground floor. Pile dirt up along the north and east sides so it looks like a big landform from the river.

I did something similar for my architectural thesis back in school.

Maybe they could even offer the new retail space to Home Depot to unlock that prime parcel as well.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #472  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2019, 9:39 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,556
Kamin’s latest, just posted to Trib this pm, is more-or-less on the money:

There is no way this should be heard at this month’s Plan Commission given that the plan is now in complete flux. At least try to maintain some appearance of a legitimate planning approval process in this town, pols.

I’m glad the stadium and corporate entertainment district were nixed. They were stupid ideas and never should have left the drawing room...

Now it should truly be back to the drawing room to get it right....

Hey - great planning idea, guys! Why don’t we draw up lots of office at LY!?!
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #473  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 8:04 AM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
I think they should propose the world's largest (first?) Multilevel marijuana grow center. Full-block footprints, 15+ stories, 100% aquaculture.

Perfect.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #474  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 3:21 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,623
Latest Lincoln Yards twist only ratchets up music club owners' anxiety

Quote:
“People are saying they killed the entertainment district, but all that it (Hopkins’ statement) means is the venues won’t be in one mega-mall building and owned by Live Nation,” said Robert Gomez, a club owner (Subterranean, Beat Kitchen) who is co-chair of the Chicago Independent Venue League (CIVL). “Nothing really changes.”

“There has still been no disclosure about what kind of venues are being proposed,” he added. “We were told privately that it would be multiple venues with up to 10,000 capacity collectively. Even if Live Nation can’t own the venues, they can still lease them or control them. Or what about AEG or any other large player (national concert promoter) coming in and taking control? You still have all these power brokers for music that we would all have to dance around that could come in there and take over.”

CIVL, a consortium of independent music clubs, came together in part to give the city’s music community a voice in the Lincoln Yards project, which most directly threatens the future of the nearby Hideout, but is also seen as a potential disruption of the local music scene. “If all these new venues come in, some other venues will have to go,” said Double Door owner Sean Mulroney.

Club owners were taken aback that the city was prepared to help bankroll corporate-owned competitors through tax increment financing (TIF). In interviews with a dozen club owners and members of the music community across Chicago, all felt blind-sided by the project, which came into view less than a year ago.

“The communication (between developer Sterling Bay and the community) in general has been minimal,” Gomez said. “The feeling is that the intent all along was to fly this under the radar until it was a done deal.”

Adding to the sense of anxiety is that the Chicago Plan Commission is scheduled to consider a revised Lincoln Yards plan, presumably tailored to address Hopkins’ objections, at its Jan. 24 meeting.

“It’s been close to a year now, and we still haven’t seen a detailed plan for how they (Sterling Bay) are going to do this,” said club owner Bruce Finkelman, who owns multiple venues including the Empty Bottle and Thalia Hall. “Why would you consider pushing something like this through when the people who are going to be affected by it haven’t even seen a plan of exactly what this involves?”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #475  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 4:02 PM
Leveled Leveled is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
I think they should propose the world's largest (first?) Multilevel marijuana grow center. Full-block footprints, 15+ stories, 100% aquaculture.

Perfect.
If i had money ide buy this thing and put one in there.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #476  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 4:50 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leveled View Post
If i had money ide buy this thing and put one in there.

If I had the money I'd buy that thing and make it my house. I don't care, I'll access it by boat...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #477  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 5:55 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,391
^I'm pretty sure Amtrak is gonna sell it off soon. Get the city to landmark it first, and you might be able to get it for $1 by transferring the FAR to whoever buys the adjacent land. Unless Amtrak lawyers succeed with a claim that the Staggers Act trumps local landmark ordinances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #478  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 6:29 PM
Leveled Leveled is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
If I had the money I'd buy that thing and make it my house. I don't care, I'll access it by boat...
See, plants dont mind electric lighting. But to live in there, you would have to carve up the walls or accept living in twilight.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #479  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2019, 6:33 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,452
^^^ with wide open floor plans that's plenty of windows. Those are like 6x12' probably.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
^I'm pretty sure Amtrak is gonna sell it off soon. Get the city to landmark it first, and you might be able to get it for $1 by transferring the FAR to whoever buys the adjacent land. Unless Amtrak lawyers succeed with a claim that the Staggers Act trumps local landmark ordinances.
It's funny because I actually know people who would lease the space inside of this building. They only need access for a few trucks a week.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #480  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2019, 3:02 AM
ORD2010 ORD2010 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 46
I have honestly always had a fascination with that building, I use to pass it all the time, I always wanted to see it turned into a modern art museum, or some form of exhibition space or offices, like the battersea station in london, have a large bridge connecting to roosevelt for pedestrians
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.