Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123
The discussion is often stuck in moralizing territory and incentive structures or goals are de-emphasized. We want a fair and humane system, sure, but we also want low drug use, not high drug use. We accept this with smoking which the government has worked hard to wipe out.
I'm not sure but you might actually get in more trouble in Vancouver for smoking tobacco than for doing hard drugs in a lot of places. Not sure what the relative affordability is like.
As far as incentive structure we have an economy where low skill wages are poor and often don't even allow people to get secure housing. For a person with no supports who may already have a lot of problems (like brain damage from a drug overdose) I wonder how much of a quality of life difference there is between trying really hard to get your life in order with all the real life setbacks that happen and just doing drugs and bouncing around whatever social services exist. On top of that there's the addiction factor slanting things.
|
Your last paragraph totally hits the nail on the head; I can confirm this from (now) years of experience with many people (and far from just my significant other).
The cliff that one needs to climb to “go back to being a citizen” when you’ve thoroughly fucked up all aspects of your life… being sober and facing that, is just unbearable, so 99% of them just continue to get drugged out of their mind, as the only realistic solution to forget.
“My family doesn’t talk to me anymore; I have tons of unpaid tickets; I lost all my former decent friends (my only acquaintances are drug addicts now); I have tons of debt everywhere (hydro, credit cards, unpaid rent from before homelessness); I’m ashamed to run into anyone who used to know me before I became the wreck I am now; etc.”
It’s a really steep mountain to climb.