HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4681  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 8:09 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aylmer View Post
I would like to point out that the O-Train is narrower than most other passenger trains in Canada, yet has level boarding despite having shared the tracks with freight trains for years. It's been accomplished with retractable platform extensions.

And yes, passenger rail coming second to freight is another thing.
That's only accomplished with low floor trains rather than high platforms. I thought you were talking about platform height rather than train floor height when you said "What is wrong with us that we can't do something as simple as raising the platforms..."
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #4682  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 10:27 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
That's only accomplished with low floor trains rather than high platforms. I thought you were talking about platform height rather than train floor height when you said "What is wrong with us that we can't do something as simple as raising the platforms..."
I am talking about platform height ― The system of retractable platforms extensions works for the O-Train's 70cm 'low floor' just as well as it would work for VIA's ~150cm.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
     
     
  #4683  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 1:55 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,809
Union Station second platform set to Open Monday:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/union-station-second-platform-set-to-open-1.2735325
Quote:
The long-awaited second platform is set to open at Union Station on Monday.

Previously there was one platform in the centre of the station, allowing riders to access both the Yonge and University subway lines. The single platform was often overcrowded after sporting events like Maple Leaf, Raptor and Blue Jay games, and during the tourist season.

Transit riders will now use one platform to board Finch-bound trains on the Yonge Street line and the other to head to destinations on Downsview-bound trains on the University line. There will be two stairwells leading to the different platforms.

With the completion of construction, Union Station is transformed from a centre platform configuration to a side platform configuration. The rehabilitated centre platform is now for Downsview-bound trains and the new platform will be for Finch-bound trains.

The TTC says the addition of the second platform will double the passenger capacity at the station.



This is the first of many big transit events in Toronto over the next few months. By the end of the year we will see:

-New streetcars
-Mississauga Transitway phase 1
-Highway 7 BRT phase 2
-new GO concourse at Union station
-re-opening of the Queens Quay streetcar
-PRESTO on the TTC

Early next year will see a bunch of openings as well, the next 12 months are going to be exciting for transit in TO.
     
     
  #4684  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 5:35 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
This Union Station thing is gonna take forever to complete. And even when its finished, even more renovations are coming once plans and approvals are in place for the bus station, DRL, downtown relief line, GO Express Regional Rail, LRT Expansion, and decking over the tracks.

Union Station will be in perpetual major construction for the foreseeable long term.
     
     
  #4685  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 5:41 AM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
Union Station second platform set to Open Monday:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/union-station-second-platform-set-to-open-1.2735325



This is the first of many big transit events in Toronto over the next few months. By the end of the year we will see:

-New streetcars
-Mississauga Transitway phase 1
-Highway 7 BRT phase 2
-new GO concourse at Union station
-re-opening of the Queens Quay streetcar
-PRESTO on the TTC

Early next year will see a bunch of openings as well, the next 12 months are going to be exciting for transit in TO.
Why side-loading instead of, say, a spanish solution?
     
     
  #4686  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 12:32 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIce View Post
Why side-loading instead of, say, a spanish solution?
OK, I'll bite.
     
     
  #4687  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 1:13 PM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIce View Post
Why side-loading instead of, say, a spanish solution?
For Union Station? It would certainly be beneficial, however, I don't think they have enough space to implement a spanish solution.
     
     
  #4688  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 1:25 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
The arrangement in Union as far as I know is platform track platform track. How do you propose a Spanish solution similar to the RT at Kennedy?
     
     
  #4689  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 2:37 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,809
Spanish solution is when there is 3 platforms. Its not at needed for capacity, and thus wasn't built.
     
     
  #4690  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 5:37 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy_haak View Post
For Union Station? It would certainly be beneficial, however, I don't think they have enough space to implement a spanish solution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
The arrangement in Union as far as I know is platform track platform track. How do you propose a Spanish solution similar to the RT at Kennedy?
This is my bad. I had to re-read the article a few times to visualize the layout. This makes more sense to me now.
     
     
  #4691  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 5:43 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Ugh, that's a lot of money!

Four-car LRT project’s price tag hits $300M

Full Article: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/calgary/Four+project+price+hits+300M/10089255/story.html
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #4692  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 6:58 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Just imagine how expensive it would if the C-Train had underground stations and they didn't do the easy-expansion-with-knockout-walls approach that Toronto did with Sheppard and that Ottawa will be doing with Confederation.
     
     
  #4693  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 7:10 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Yeah. That is how Vancouver did the Canada Line as well.

The reason it's so expensive is because of the amount of stations on the line. Out of the 45 stations, over 30 of them required extensions... but even still, that works out to like $9 million a station which doesn't seem right. However, I doubt the figure includes the $200 million worth of new trains the city just ordered, so I don't know how the hell it got so expensive.

I hope that when they build the subway, they build knockout walls for the future extension of the 201 Line stations to 5 cars.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #4694  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 7:38 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Yeah. That is how Vancouver did the Canada Line as well.

The reason it's so expensive is because of the amount of stations on the line. Out of the 45 stations, over 30 of them required extensions... but even still, that works out to like $9 million a station which doesn't seem right. However, I doubt the figure includes the $200 million worth of new trains the city just ordered, so I don't know how the hell it got so expensive.

I hope that when they build the subway, they build knockout walls for the future extension of the 201 Line stations to 5 cars.
In the article (that you posted? O_o):
$20 million: extended downtown platforms (from larger $183-million 7th Avenue refurbishment)
$112 million: other platform extensions (including the rebuilt Chinook LRT)
$68 million: electrical system upgrades for longer trains
$100 million: 30 new light rail vehicles, arriving 2015 to 2017
Total: $300 million

Expansion of the fleet is accounted separate from replacing older LRVs, but it includes a whole lot more than just concrete and paint. I imagine that work upgrading the electrical substations was pretty expensive already.

Last edited by VIce; Aug 14, 2014 at 7:55 PM.
     
     
  #4695  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 7:40 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,578
It also includes the downtown lifecycle of the stations, which would have been needed to be done even if there weren't any plans for four car trains.
     
     
  #4696  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 7:42 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Ohhh right! I forgot about the whole 7th Avenue Project. Yeah, that would have been a good chunk, rebuilding an entire 15 blocks of sidewalk and rebuilding 9 stations entirely, along with the demolition of 3 stations. Makes sense.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #4697  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 7:46 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Ohhh right! I forgot about the whole 7th Avenue Project. Yeah, that would have been a good chunk, rebuilding an entire 15 blocks of sidewalk and rebuilding 9 stations entirely, along with the demolition of 3 stations. Makes sense.
Only $20m from the 7th avenue project is accounted for in the $300m figure (the marginal cost of 4-car platforms over 3-car platforms).
     
     
  #4698  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 7:50 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Oh so they do count the new LRVs in the $300 million. All right then!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #4699  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 9:32 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,664
So what's going to happen on the other side of the centre platform at Union?

When I lived in Toronto, I thought it would be good if they just split the line and turn Union into an exchange station and then have each side continue out to either side of King to meet up with the B-D line farther out east and west.

     
     
  #4700  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 9:43 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,889
Existing Centre platform is now westbound (University). New platform is eastbound (Yonge). That is all there is.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.