Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore Trout
It's also important that cities don't half-ass bikeshare. Bixi was originally a kind of public/private for-profit Frankenstein's monster kind of thing, but when it went bankrupt in 2014, the city bailed it out and it's now run more like a regular public transport operator. And it has become ubiquitous.
|
Toronto went through something very similar, also involving Bixi. As a P3, one of Bixi's main flaws was that it chose a very small geography to roll out its bike share system. There were no bike stations west of Bathurst, for example. On paper, this seemed to be a cautious, profit-maximizing approach but bike share systems, like any other transportation system, require a large catchment area, much of which might be unprofitable, to generate the network effects to sustain themselves.
After bixi went belly up in 2014, the city took over and gave control of the bike share system to the Toronto Parking Authority. Now, giving control of a fledgling bike share system to a parking authority might seem like letting a fox take control of the henhouse, but the system became vastly better almost overnight.
Whatever your thoughts might be about the role of parking in a city, the TPA is a very well-run municipal corporation. It's known for providing good customer service and well-maintained infrastructure, and a lot of that mentality has trickled down to impact the Bike Share system. Also, I'm not sure if this is a coincidence, but Toronto's cycling network has gone from being embarrassingly bad to actually being somewhat decent since the TPA took over TO Bike Share.