HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


View Poll Results: What is the most compelling UBC project or proposal?
University Town 34 31.48%
University Boulevard 34 31.48%
Museum of Anthropology Expansion 12 11.11%
UBC Winter Sports Centre 11 10.19%
Irving K. Barber Learning Centre 7 6.48%
Sauder School of Business building redevelopment 10 9.26%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2013, 7:08 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIMBAM View Post
...and they made everything so high tech that it's constantly breaking and maintenance must be a fortune. I mean, come on, do water fountains really need to run on censors?
I think things like this are becoming all too common.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2013, 4:29 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
A quick update on the two main construction projects on campus at the moment. The Ponderosa east tower has topped out and the west block facade is looking great!





The new Student Union Building is finally above grade:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2013, 8:22 AM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
Is the old SUB at end-of-life and being torn down, or is it being incorporated into the project?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2013, 11:41 PM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zassk View Post
Is the old SUB at end-of-life and being torn down, or is it being incorporated into the project?
Once the new building opens in time for the 2014/2015 school year, the old one will be shut down for extensive renovations for a few months but then reopened. It's a solid building but largely unchanged since my mom's days
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2013, 11:53 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2013, 4:55 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
The UBC Pharmaceutical Sciences building was featured on ArchDaily yesterday.



More info and photos here: http://www.archdaily.com/283728/ubc-...e-architectes/
__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 5:50 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
Update on the Ponderosa Commons:

The curtain wall is looking complete on the East building's podium, but I don't know why they haven't started installing the pre-cast panels on the tower portion yet...




West building:




How's this for a streetwall?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 8:25 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Nice.

I can see the Telus podium looking something like that.

For example, much better than Ryerson at Toronto Eaton Centre:

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ste...is/3343255046/

Maybe the west building will be used for conferences during the summer or September occupancy and is being fast-tracked?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 11:38 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Musqueam development plans for Block F of the UEL

I saw an ad recently in the paper that the 3rd public meeting about this redevelopment is coming up on April 18 at the University Golf Clubhouse from 4 - 8.


more details at

https://www.placespeak.com/topic/508...on-uel-block-f
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2013, 12:15 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Thanks.

Here are the February 2013 panels from that link.

I think I like Option 2 - but the through street should be lined up with the grid behind.
For Option 1 - it is odd to a have a road through a small park.
Option 3 seems to pose accessibility issues to the commercial space (grocery) for residents in behind.
In Option 2 the commercial space looks accessible from University Blvd and on foot from behind and keeps the hotel on the main street.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


https://www.placespeak.com/topic/508...on-uel-block-f
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2013, 7:07 AM
huenthar huenthar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
option 3 is awful... Not sure if I prefer 1 or 2 though...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2013, 8:28 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Looks like the current preferred option is primarily based on Option 1 above.
Is it so bad if they line up those streets?

http://www.vancourier.com/news/Devel...589/story.html

Quote:

Developing Story: Musqueam showcase preferred option for development on endowment lands
By Naoibh O’Connor, Staff writer


The site plan for the Musqueam Indian Band’s preferred option for its proposed development of a 22-acre site on the University Endowment Lands.
Photograph by: Rendering courtesy of Rositch Hemphill Architects, PWL Partnership Landscape Architects


The preferred option envisions a commercial village of 30,000 square feet, a four-storey 120-room hotel, residential buildings, including three-storey town homes, four-to-six storey buildings, and four towers between 18 to 22 storeys, as well as open spaces in the form of trails, parks and village greens, according to Gordon Easton, project manager at Colliers International.

Easton added it allows for the mature stand of trees to remain with the wetlands in the centre of the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted May 1, 2013, 5:01 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
From BIV:

Quote:
Open houses regarding the Musqueam Indian Band’s plans for a 21-acre parcel on University Boulevard has concluded with plans for two 22-storey towers in exchange for greater green space.

...

The tract is zoned for low intensity development of no more than four storeys. The band went public with a vision for four towers and a mix of low-rise development set amid three acres of parkland.

However, public feedback prompted the band to boost greenspace to seven acres, pushing up the tower heights to 18 storeys and 22 storeys.

“We’re building a little higher than anticipated,” admitted Grant, who suggested last fall that the towers could be in the range of 12 storeys.

The next step is a rezoning application to province, which oversees the property ceded to the Musqueam.
http://www.biv.com/article/20130430/...sity-boulevard


More info:

https://www.placespeak.com/topic/508...n-uel-block-f/

Render:



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Last edited by officedweller; May 1, 2013 at 5:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted May 1, 2013, 2:56 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,696
Option 1 definitely makes the most sense. There's almost no point to building the commercial component if it's going to be hidden away and only accessible to the immediate development. I'm also glad to see they are keeping some of the trees rather than creating one big soggy field.

OD - I thought that the road alignment was odd as well, as it's obviously meant to deter use by the adjacent area residents. I'd be curious to see a traffic impact study though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted May 1, 2013, 6:19 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,426
WHY AREN'T THEY BUILDING A SUPERTALL???

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted May 1, 2013, 6:40 PM
huenthar huenthar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
I think it'd be better without the southern road at all; instead, extend Ortona Ave along the southern edge of the site (and through the church parking lot) to University Blvd at the golf course intersection, and use that as the access road (have a lane enter the site from Ortona to access residential).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted May 1, 2013, 7:44 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,023
Good point - but I think that's a school to the south of Ortona Road - so they probably want to minimize traffic on that street.

BTW - why is that new road (intersecting with University Blvd near the church) so wide?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted May 21, 2013, 5:33 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
Some updates from last week:

The new Student Union Building is moving along quickly





And Concert's market-rental tower is nearing completion:


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted May 21, 2013, 4:40 PM
Zassk Zassk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,303
It's amazing to see the new SUB taking shape. When I was at UBC in the 90's, it really seemed like this development would never come to fruition. Come to think of it, I suppose some of my student fees are embodied in the new structure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted May 21, 2013, 6:50 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zassk View Post
It's amazing to see the new SUB taking shape. When I was at UBC in the 90's, it really seemed like this development would never come to fruition. Come to think of it, I suppose some of my student fees are embodied in the new structure.
It certainly is. I think UBC students are paying something around $250 per semester by next year or the following, it goes towards paying the new SUB.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:00 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.