HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2020, 10:00 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,646
Council OKs controversial Barrhaven LRT route and Gatineau's tram vision for Ottawa

Jon Willing, Ottawa Citizen
Publishing date: Nov 25, 2020 • Last Updated 3 minutes ago • 3 minute read


Council has endorsed the controversial route for the Barrhaven LRT extension, with the majority of members agreeing to wipe out homes to make way for the rail infrastructure.

The city has no intention of building the $3-billion LRT extension anytime soon, since it doesn’t have the money, but council’s approval of the route and direction to complete the environmental assessment is the first step. The city would require all project funding from the two upper governments.

It’s a Stage 3 LRT project, along with extending LRT to Kanata and Stittsville. The city isn’t even halfway through building the Stage 2 O-Train extensions.

Council on Wednesday voted 18-4 in favour of the functional design of the LRT line and new road and LRT overpasses over the Via Rail line in Barrhaven.

Councillors Riley Brockington, Rawlson King, Catherine McKenney and Shawn Menard were in opposition. The four councillors were concerned about the project’s impact to rental homes.

The approved corridor would run from Algonquin College to Barrhaven town centre, first on an elevated guideway on the west side of Woodroffe Avenue as trains leave the college station. South of Hunt Club Road, the rail line will be built on 7.6 kilometres of the existing southwest Transitway. There would be seven stations, including three new ones and four converted from bus stations.

The corridor requires expropriating land that currently has 120 rental homes between Knoxdale Road and Hunt Club Road. The Manor Village community has been vocally opposed to the LRT project taking out homes and displacing residents. Residents even demonstrated outside Mayor Jim Watson’s house this week.

A working group will be struck to assess how to help residents who will be forced from their homes.

The matter is further complicated by a new property owner’s plan to redevelop one of the sites in Manor Village before the city begins the Barrhaven LRT project.

“It’s a discussion I’m already engaged on with the new ownership,” Knoxdale-Merivale Coun. Keith Egli said.

Egli called for the city to develop a tenant support and assistance strategy to help displaced residents.

The city had previously considered 1005-1045 Greenbank Rd. as a future site for affordable housing, but the Barrhaven LRT project requires the land for a train storage and maintenance facility. The city will search for other suitable sites across the planned Phase 3 routes.

Council voted in favour of staff looking at a city-owned property at 40 Beechcliffe St. for the potential to build affordable housing. The site is north of Knoxdale Road near Woodroffe Avenue.

On a separate matter, council was a good neighbour and voted in support of the City of Gatineau’s plan to run electrified rail into Ottawa.

Both potential routes — a surface tram on Wellington Street and a tram tunnel under Sparks Street — received council’s endorsement, with the tunnel identified as the “optimal corridor.”

Gatineau and the Société de transport de l’Outaouais is planning a new transit system between Aylmer and downtown Ottawa using the Portage Bridge as the interprovincial connection point.

The Wellington Street option would cost $3.032 billion, while the Sparks Street tunnel option would be between $3.532 billion and $3.899 billion.

Gatineau needs financial help from the Quebec government and the federal government to build the transit system. No City of Ottawa money would be used.

Council backed a call for a federally funded study on a transit “loop” that could connect the downtowns of Ottawa and Hull. The study could also examine the idea of creating a pedestrian mall on Wellington Street.

Council also called on any federal money to be prioritized for Stage 3 LRT projects, such as Barrhaven LRT.

jwilling@postmedia.com
twitter.com/JonathanWilling

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...ion-for-ottawa
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2020, 7:48 AM
Nowhere Nowhere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 228
Can someone explain to me how it's possible that the Fallowfield to Barrhaven Center part is estimated at $1B ? It's slightly less than 4 km of at grade LRT in a right of way that's already largely built.

The Place d'Orléans to Trim part is almost as long and it was estimated at $160M.

Edit. I realize that there are no stations between Place and Trim, but still, $1B is more than the whole stage 2 Trillium Line.

Last edited by Nowhere; Dec 14, 2020 at 9:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2020, 1:35 PM
OCCheetos OCCheetos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhere View Post
Can someone explain to me how it's possible that the Fallowfield to Barrhaven Center part is estimated at $1B ? It's slightly less than 4 km of at grade LRT in a right of way that's already largely built.

The Place d'Orléans to Trim part is almost as long and it was estimated at $160M.

Edit. I realize that there are no stations between Place and Trim, but still, $1B is more than the whole stage 2 Trillium Line.
I've always suspected that it's the requirement for additional vehicles and a new yard. The MOU to expand Belfast and acquire new trains for Stage 2 was almost $500 million on its own.

Beyond that, I have no idea. Inflation maybe?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2020, 1:42 PM
Multi-modal Multi-modal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhere View Post
Can someone explain to me how it's possible that the Fallowfield to Barrhaven Center part is estimated at $1B ? It's slightly less than 4 km of at grade LRT in a right of way that's already largely built.

The Place d'Orléans to Trim part is almost as long and it was estimated at $160M.

Edit. I realize that there are no stations between Place and Trim, but still, $1B is more than the whole stage 2 Trillium Line.
While it still seems a tad expensive, this part of the extension includes the new LMSF at Greenbank, 4 new/repurposed stations, 4 grade separations (Berrigan Drive, Marketplace Avenue, the east-west private road 100m south of Marketplace Avenue, and Chapman Mills Drive), and a Park & Ride lot at Barrhaven Centre Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2020, 4:01 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,642
The cost still doesn't make sense compared to Stage 1. Terrible soil conditions in Barrhaven (I assume) and inflation could explain the price disparity in part, but still, how can it be over 1/3 more expensive than Stage 1, with its the initial fleet of vehicles, control center, more frequent and decently elaborate above ground stations, and a 2.5 kilometer subway with large, multi-level stations?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 12:58 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,646
City staff find way to save Manor Village homes from LRT destruction, while 'renovictions' remove tenants
"Our team understands that having to move is inconvenient and stressful."

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Citizen
May 18, 2022 • 51 minutes ago • 6 minute read


City staff are proposing a way to rescue the rental homes sentenced to destruction in 2020 by the council-endorsed route for the future Barrhaven LRT extension. But in Manor Village, where half those units are located, the low-rent townhouses that residents fought hard to save from the train are being renovated out of existence, and the owner is trying to evict those tenants who’ve declined to move out to make way for unit upgrades.

A majority of council members voted in November 2020 to endorse a route that would require the expropriating of land that hosted 60 rental units at Manor Village and another 60 at the nearby Cheryl Gardens complex, together housing more than 300 tenants at the time.

Staff were directed to form a working group to look at how to help the residents who would be impacted. According to a report published Thursday, staff revisited a previous option to have an elevated LRT guideway run down the centre of Woodroffe Avenue from Knoxdale Road to Hunt Club Road.

It wasn’t recommended previously for a number of reasons, city staff explain in the report, but they investigated options to address these issues and conclude that “this solution avoids displacement of tenants, loss of housing stock and mitigates increasing costs related to property purchases.”

This revised alignment recommended by staff could cost an extra $35 million to $50 million, bringing the total cost estimate for the Barrhaven LRT project to $3.52 billion, though there is still no timeline for when the project would start and no funding secured. The proposal will come before transportation committee and council for a vote in the coming weeks.

Meanwhile, the owners of Manor Village have been hard at work transforming the low-rent townhouse complex at Majestic Drive and Woodroffe Avenue, offering buyouts, and more recently, eviction notices to tenants so they can upgrade the units they occupied. Townhouses that have already undergone renovations are being marketed right now to students and professionals for room rentals, and to those who can rent a home for $3,000-plus a month.

Thirty-five Manor Village households have received N13 eviction notices. According to ACORN Canada, a community-based social justice organization that a number of Manor Village tenants belong to, the move-out date they’ve been given is August 31. Tenants are not obligated to leave — and some are vowing to stay — but the landlord can apply to the Landlord and Tenant Board for an eviction order.

“When we acquired this property last year, it was in a state of poor repair and required significant refurbishment work to bring standards up including all new roofs, internal retrofits, new and additional windows and along with substantial electrical and plumbing upgrades,” reads a statement Smart Living Properties sent to this newspaper.

The Ottawa company manages and co-owns the Manor Village complex, which they purchased in September 2020. Ownership is shared with Toronto-based Forum Equity Partners, which develops, acquires and asset manages residential and commercial real estate, according to its website.

They’ve done as much of the work as possible in empty units in over the past few months, said Smart Living, but all units now need to be vacated “to finish the extensive repairs safely.”

The company’s website advertises two available rental options at “Woodroffe Place” (the rebranded Manor Village): a four-bedroom house with a private yard for $3,200+, and a $750 roommate option for students and professionals, looking to share a home with others of that renter category. Units are fully furnished, equipped with granite countertops and smart TVs, and include utilities, internet and in-suite laundry, according to the website.

“Our team understands that having to move is inconvenient and stressful,” said Smart Living. The company said it “successfully negotiated relocation deals in which departing tenants were generously compensated, at a much higher amount than what is legally required,” as well as provided home finding services and support with moving expenses. These “relocation packages” remain on offer for the tenants who’ve been served N13s.

Smart Living Properties said its Manor Village project will deliver 111 “newly renovated and much needed modernized residential units” to the rental market in west Ottawa, once completed.

If the plan for a reworked LRT route proposed by staff is approved, those units will live on, undisturbed by the Barrhaven extension. But what won’t survive, with the ongoing “renovictions” at Manor Village, as they’re being described, is the affordable rental units that tenants and advocates fought hard to try to save in 2020.

It’s a shame, Knoxville-Merivale Coun. Keith Egli said Wednesday, but he added that he’s not sure what the answer is.

“They are the property owners. They have certain rights. The tenants have certain rights. And it sounds like a number of these are going to end up … in front of the (Landlord and Tenant) board, which is appropriate.”

Peggy Rafter is one of the Manor Village tenants vowing to challenge their eviction.

The 63-year-old retiree has lived in the complex for more than 30 years and pays $1,145 monthly for her two-bedroom townhouse.

“I have no choice but to fight for my home. I live on limited money. The community is wonderful,” said Rafter, in an interview earlier this week.

She’s an ACORN member and marched alongside fellow tenants at a protest the group organized Wednesday to call attention to the Manor Village evictions, and demand a meeting with the landlord and withdrawal of the N13s

“I can’t even describe how mentally draining it would be, and it is already, the thought of having to be displaced,” said Rafter. “Where am I going to end up? You know, just the what-ifs of everything.”

Legally, Ontario tenants who receive a N13 for repairs or renovations have the right to return to their rental unit when those are completed and pay the same rent the landlord would have been able to charge them had they never left. Exercising this right does require the tenant to tell their landlord they intend to do so, in writing, before they leave the unit, and to inform them of any change of address.

But Rafter doesn’t believe she and fellow tenants will be allowed back. ACORN has argued that the fine for not respecting a tenant’s right to return — up to $50,000 for an individual and $250,000 for a corporation ⁠— “is just the cost of doing business for financialized landlords like Forum Equities.”

Asked if it was committed to allowing tenants who want it, their right to return to their units at Manor Village (now Woodroffe Place), Smart Living did not provide any assurances.

“We are ending the tenancy agreements for these units because we are making extensive repairs and parts of the units will be demolished and reconfigured in the process,” they said.

“All we’re asking is for the (remaining) people to be left to live. We can live amongst students, I mean we’re all people,” said Rafter.

“I know it’s all about the money, but have some dignity for people that have been here 30, 40, 45 years.”

As for those who’ve already left, Rafter and Amanda McMahon, another longtime Manor Village resident, said they believe some did so because they were resigned to the eventual destruction of their homes by the LRT route.

Struggling to maintain her composure as she addressed the assembled protesters Wednesday, McMahon said she doesn’t know where she’ll go, if she has to leave the rental she shares with her mom and four children, and pays $1,414 a month for.

“We will be homeless. We will be living in my van.”

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...-vacated-units
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 2:10 AM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 1,979
Amazing isn't it? The City was fine with demolishing a large number of low-rent houses for its LRT, since those properties generate little in taxes.

In swoops a redeveloper, who picks up the land at a low price. They tell the City that they are creating 'luxury' properties that will pay high property taxes to the City.

Bang! A previously dismissed, more expensive, LRT routing that spares the neighbourhood is suddenly feasible, and now preferred. Tax-payers can simply pay a lot more for the LRT so that developers can make money and the City can get a little higher future tax revenue.

AND, the City no longer needs to deal with evicting all those tenants - the developer is doing that for them. Hey, that is a win-win, for the City and the developer.

(Not so much for the tenants or the tax-payers. But they don't matter.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 2:21 AM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
Amazing isn't it? The City was fine with demolishing a large number of low-rent houses for its LRT, since those properties generate little in taxes.

In swoops a redeveloper, who picks up the land at a low price. They tell the City that they are creating 'luxury' properties that will pay high property taxes to the City.

Bang! A previously dismissed, more expensive, LRT routing that spares the neighbourhood is suddenly feasible, and now preferred. Tax-payers can simply pay a lot more for the LRT so that developers can make money and the City can get a little higher future tax revenue.

AND, the City no longer needs to deal with evicting all those tenants - the developer is doing that for them. Hey, that is a win-win, for the City and the developer.

(Not so much for the tenants or the tax-payers. But they don't matter.)
Smart Living Properties have owned this property for a couple of years and stated that what there plan was at the time of purchase.

At the time of the decision to route the LRT through said property there was an uproar followed by councilors pushing staff to take a further look into the other options.

https://globalnews.ca/news/7484258/o...manor-village/

Last edited by Williamoforange; May 19, 2022 at 3:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 10:54 AM
Athens Athens is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 56
What a joke. Those properties are 60 year old cheap dumps. No amount of renovations is going to turn them into “luxury” rentals. I say tear them down and build something dense close to the station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 12:40 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,642
No surprise here. People were up in arms about the City demolishing a bunch of low income townhomes in 5-10 years, so the City goes out of its way to find another, more expensive route to save the townhomes. The current property owner then immediately kicks out tenants in order to make more money. Entirely predictable.

The current (and now evicted) tenants would have been in a far better position if they would have kept calm and asked the right questions (instead of freaking out) and let the City develop a plan for purchasing the properties, transitioning the tenants to new housing and demolished for the rail line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 12:41 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Athens View Post
What a joke. Those properties are 60 year old cheap dumps. No amount of renovations is going to turn them into “luxury” rentals. I say tear them down and build something dense close to the station.
Everything nowadays is "Luxury". Just waiting for the Sally Anne to call its new homeless shelter in Vanier "luxury living for the non-housed!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 12:47 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,524
Either way it is bad for those who live there, but I am not convinced that having the tracks swerve over to the centre of the road for 1 block only to swerve back to the same side of the road is a good idea (less comfortable ride and increased wheel wear). If the tenants are being evicted anyway, maybe the city should expropriate the land now at the unimproved market value (or trade it for land the owner could develop). The city could then let the existing tenants stay for now, but not rent out units that become vacant to reduce the number of tenants to relocate when the extension is built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 12:55 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818 View Post
Either way it is bad for those who live there, but I am not convinced that having the tracks swerve over to the centre of the road for 1 block only to swerve back to the same side of the road is a good idea (less comfortable ride and increased wheel wear). If the tenants are being evicted anyway, maybe the city should expropriate the land now at the unimproved market value (or trade it for land the owner could develop). The city could then let the existing tenants stay for now, but not rent out units that become vacant to reduce the number of tenants to relocate when the extension is built.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 1:45 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Everything nowadays is "Luxury". Just waiting for the Sally Anne to call its new homeless shelter in Vanier "luxury living for the non-housed!"
'World Class Luxury'. This is the Ottawa way.
__________________
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.harleydavis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 5:02 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Everything nowadays is "Luxury". Just waiting for the Sally Anne to call its new homeless shelter in Vanier "luxury living for the non-housed!"
This luxurious establishment already has a lock on that moniker



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...lter-1.5929625
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 5:15 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
No surprise here. People were up in arms about the City demolishing a bunch of low income townhomes in 5-10 years, so the City goes out of its way to find another, more expensive route to save the townhomes. The current property owner then immediately kicks out tenants in order to make more money. Entirely predictable.

The current (and now evicted) tenants would have been in a far better position if they would have kept calm and asked the right questions (instead of freaking out) and let the City develop a plan for purchasing the properties, transitioning the tenants to new housing and demolished for the rail line.
So much this.

You could actually do something with bus transit in the core for that amount of money. Now, we just once again will get the honour of paying for another bloated suburban LRT expansion.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted May 19, 2022, 5:16 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
This luxurious establishment already has a lock on that moniker



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...lter-1.5929625
I am informed that those VERY TASTEFUL LETTERS went away.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted May 31, 2022, 3:10 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,646
Transportation committee backs 'imperfect' solution to save homes slated for LRT expropriation

Taylor Blewett, Ottawa Citizen
May 30, 2022 • 56 minutes ago • 4 minute read




While some expressed reluctance, transportation committee members ultimately voted together Monday to endorse spending tens of millions more than planned on a reworking of the future Barrhaven LRT route that would avoid the need to expropriate homes, but also benefit a landlord currently “renovicting” many of the tenants in them.

City staff told the committee Monday it was council direction, stemming from concern over the planned destruction of 120 homes in the Manor Village and Cheryl Gardens communities, that sent them back to the drawing board on a Woodroffe Avenue section of the route endorsed by council in 2020.

The plan they’ve come back with – to run an elevated guideway down the middle of Woodroffe Avenue between Knoxdale Road and Hunt Club Road, rather than along its west side – is on city-owned property and would avoid any residential displacement. It was not recommended originally because of “technical and operating disadvantages,” such as curves that would create noise and increase maintenance costs, transportation planning and environmental assessments, program manager Frank McKinney told the committee. They’ve found ways to mitigate most concerns and manage others “with careful design and appropriate construction procedures.”

That took a lot of work, creativity and collaboration between different departments, said city planning boss Stephen Willis, in an interview. “We managed to solve problems that we didn’t think were solvable before.”

A number of councillors on the committee shared misgivings about spending the additional $35 million to $50 million the new alignment could cost to build, especially when it appears it wouldn’t save many of the affordable homes people were concerned about losing back in 2020.

The owners of Manor Village are in the middle of an effort to buy out and, failing that, evict tenants in order to renovate and re-list their low-rent townhouses, at prices like $750 for a furnished room and $3,200-plus for a four-bedroom house and yard.

“It’s frustrating,” said Coun. Diane Deans, “(if) we take on an additional cost to make sure that those affordable housing units are protected and that people can remain in their homes and then they’re renovicted out of their homes, regardless … That is a bit of a dilemma for all of us.”

It’s an “intensely frustrating situation,” Willis acknowledged. But the evictions happening at Manor Village aren’t something the city can step in and stop, he explained to the committee. The owners, Smart Living Properties and Forum Equity Partners, haven’t needed to file any development application with the city to do their renovations, so the city can’t use the approval process to try to get concessions — and it’s the Ontario government and provincial Landlord and Tenant Board that have jurisdiction over the landlord-tenant relationship.

As for the prospect, raised by a number of councillors, of building new affordable homes nearby to replace those that would be sacrificed for the planned LRT route, area councillor Keith Egli pointed out that eligibility and prioritization processes for subsidized housing mean there’s no guarantee displaced residents would be able to live there.

Coun. Mathieu Fleury noted realigning the LRT route would save the homes tenants had fought for years to retain, but it would also benefit the owner evicting many of them. He asked Peggy Rafter, a longtime Manor Village resident who addressed the committee Monday, for her take on the matter.

Rafter said she and fellow Manor Village residents now facing eviction are fighting against them. But she doesn’t want to see anyone else in the same predicament they’re in now, and the LRT route change would save homes for tenants at the nearby Cheryl Gardens complex.

“They’re going to be safe. We may lose, but they’re going to be safe,” said Rafter.

Ursula Melinz, a lawyer for the Manor Village owners, told the committee that her clients intended to improve the property when they bought it in September 2020. “It was very out of date,” she said, and they’ve had to undertake substantial renovations, from new HVAC to roofs, “in order to provide improvements, more liveable units.”

In addition to requiring the destruction of 100 homes at some point in the years to come – Stage 3 LRT doesn’t yet have a timeline or funding locked down – staff also warned that the city’s original plan for the contested 0.6-kilometre section of LRT route looks increasingly costly.

The substantial increase in real estate prices that continues today “was unforeseen” when staff originally put together the project cost, said McKinney. There are also previously unaccounted for “injurious affection” expenses (damages, essentially, beyond just the pure value of the land) they’re now warning the city is likely to face from the owners of the property facing expropriation.

Considering the potential costs now associated with the plan approved in 2020, McKinney said the additional $35 million to $50 million the new alignment is projected to require “may be a wash at the end of the day.”

Unlike LRT Stages 1 and 2, the city is looking to the federal and provincial governments to fund the entirety of the Stage 3 extensions to Barrhaven and Kanata. Willis noted upper levels of government won’t fund property acquisition for light rail and told the committee that “there almost is no ceiling to what the city could end up paying for these properties (at Manor Village and Cheryl Gardens) through this process.”

Egli urged his colleagues on the planning committee to vote in support of the route change, as all ultimately did.

“While this is imperfect … what I’m hearing as the councillor is that this is what the community wants,” said Egli.

It’s also a proposal that satisfies Manor Village’s owners. Melinz said they’d made their concerns known about the chosen LRT alignment, which was going to require up to two-thirds of their 5.74-acre property, and thanked staff Monday for reconsidering the route.

The proposal is slated to rise to council June 8.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...-expropriation
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted May 31, 2022, 12:44 PM
rakerman rakerman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 748
I've updated my Ottawa LRT Stage 3 maps with the "pinch point" for Barrhaven LRT where they propose to make the adjustments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2022, 4:50 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,642
Why!? Why approve this expensive, maintenance intensive detour to save a few townhomes that are predictably now going through renovictions!?

Expropriate now, and give the remaining residents an additional 5-10 years. I'm sure there's a way around priority lists if we replace the housing elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.