HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4481  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2023, 12:57 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,822
That's of course assuming people are starting or ending at city centres. Not all business travellers are starting out at their office on Bay St. A lot of travellers would be able to get to Pearson just as easily as Union Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4482  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2023, 1:04 AM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
That's of course assuming people are starting or ending at city centres. Not all business travellers are starting out at their office on Bay St. A lot of travellers would be able to get to Pearson just as easily as Union Station.
Sure. But the train will be extended westward eventually. And for a lot of people in the 416, eastern and northern 905, a suburban HSR station would be faster to access and a shorter trip than Pearson.

This would basically kill Porter's business to YOW and YUL. And put a substantial dent in business at Pearson.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4483  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 1:03 PM
sseguin sseguin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 233
The Plan To Bring High Speed Rail to the Corridor - Alstom's Proposal for High Frequency Rail (HFR)

While the procurement for High Frequency Rail (HFR) continues, there is a lot that remains unknown about what the future of passenger rail will be like in the Corridor. Alstom decided to go public with their vision of this future.

Instead of opting for the current design goal of 200km/h tracks and service, Alstom believe that High Speed Rail (HSR) with maximum speeds of 300km/h might be the better solution to increase ridership and the modal share of passenger rail.

Join us as we go over their plan and what the future could look like.

Video Link
__________________
Rail Fans Canada - https://www.RailFans.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4484  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 1:08 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,377
Timeline and political risk. Let's see if they have a contract before the election and if that contract survives the election. Not to mention the election after, which is right before construction start.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4485  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 1:20 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,230
If the LPC want to prove to the Conservatives that Canada can still build things then this is it.
Green Tech? Check
Public Transportation? Check
National unity? Well for S Ont and S Que, check
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4486  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 2:03 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,377
Politics of this aside. There's substantial economic and quality of life benefits to doing this. It could help relieve the housing pressure on major cities by opening up HSR commutes for white collar workers who work hybrid. Better to have them sprawl around Peterborough than on Grade A farmland near Niagara. It expands the labour and services markets in the cities that it connects. Ottawa and Montreal would effectively become one market. And it improves the resiliency of our travel infrastructure but offering a reliable alternative to weather susceptible road and air.

But it doesn't win even a tenth of the votes as a tax cut or grant program....

Last edited by Truenorth00; Feb 1, 2023 at 3:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4487  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 2:48 PM
GoTrans GoTrans is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
If the LPC want to prove to the Conservatives that Canada can still build things then this is it.
Green Tech? Check
Public Transportation? Check
National unity? Well for S Ont and S Que, check
This will probably end up like the military contracts where it is several governments and decades before we come back to the same options at a higher cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4488  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 3:12 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,230
^^
The cynicism rot in this country is strong. Not like we've done anything lately to counter this trend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4489  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 3:48 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Timeline and political risk. Let's see if they have a contract before the election and if that contract survives the election. Not to mention the election after, which is right before construction start.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Politics of this aside. There's substantial economic and quality of life benefits to doing this. It could help relieve the housing pressure on major cities by opening up HSR commutes for white collar workers who work hybrid. Better to have them sprawl around Peterborough than on Grade A farmland near Niagara. It expands the labour and services markets in the cities that it connects. Ottawa and Montreal would effectively become one market. And it improves the resiliency of our travel infrastructure but offering a reliable alternative to weather susceptible road and air.

But it doesn't win even a tenth of the votes as a tax cut or grant program....
We are looking at the potential of austerity to be able to cut taxes to give people a break with the inflation. While this project would be great for Canada, when people are struggling to pay for groceries, they will see this as a vanity project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4490  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 4:22 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,870
Strange the plan doesn't go all the way to Windsor. There are plans for Amtrack to build HSP between Detroit and Chicago so it seems like an obvious connection point between VIA and Amtrack for HSR. If I could take HSR from Union Station to Vancouver I would never fly to see my family again. Sitting around at YVR and YYZ waiting to get crammed into a plane makes me dread visiting them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4491  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 4:24 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
Strange the plan doesn't go all the way to Windsor. There are plans for Amtrack to build HSP between Detroit and Chicago so it seems like an obvious connection point between VIA and Amtrack for HSR. If I could take HSR from Union Station to Vancouver I would never fly to see my family again. Sitting around at YVR and YYZ waiting to get crammed into a plane makes me dread visiting them.
lol you realize that even an HSR train would take over 24 hours to make such a trip? It's just too far. Even destinations like Chicago and New York are generally too far for HSR to be feasible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4492  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 10:49 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,952
I think the political pressure will build to get the train to Windsor. VIA already owns the entire trackage from Chatham to Windsor and there are 2 parallel tracks between Chatham and Woodstock one owned by CN and the other by CP. Flash a big enough cheque in front of them combined with political pressure and I think it is definetly doable.

The demand is also there as London is VIA's 4th busiest station and Windsor 6th added to the fact that a HSR line would get a lot of traffic from Detroit if it is taken over the border where people could go thru customs in Detroit itself as done with airports.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4493  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 10:59 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,377
Nobody has said Southwestern Ontario is not going to get HSR. Staging matters though. Not everything can be built in Phase 1. And there's no route analysis or clarity on plans at Pearson and integration there yet. With this government, that work could easily take half a decade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4494  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 11:23 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Nobody has said Southwestern Ontario is not going to get HSR. Staging matters though. Not everything can be built in Phase 1. And there's no route analysis or clarity on plans at Pearson and integration there yet. With this government, that work could easily take half a decade.
If Toronto - Ottawa - Montreal is Phase 1, what phase would a Calgary - Edmonton be thought of? Would all of the Corridor from Windsor to Quebec City be done long before something outside of the Corridor?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4495  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 11:29 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
If Toronto - Ottawa - Montreal is Phase 1, what phase would a Calgary - Edmonton be thought of? Would all of the Corridor from Windsor to Quebec City be done long before something outside of the Corridor?
Why would CalEd be tied to QW?

I don't follow.

Two different corridors can be built at the same time. This is like saying only one city at a time in the country can build a subway or LRT. Only projects in the same corridor need to be sequenced.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4496  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2023, 11:36 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Why would CalEd be tied to QW?

I don't follow.

Two different corridors can be built at the same time. This is like saying only one city at a time in the country can build a subway or LRT. Only projects in the same corridor need to be sequenced.
For as long as HSR has been talked about many people point to the Calgary - Edmonton Corridor as a place it would work and do well.

The other reason is as you head west, investment in those provinces when compared to Quebec or Ontario is not nearly as high. So, if the TOM HSR is a success, why not use it as a political vote grabbing tool?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4497  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2023, 12:44 AM
Mister F Mister F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Politics of this aside. There's substantial economic and quality of life benefits to doing this. It could help relieve the housing pressure on major cities by opening up HSR commutes for white collar workers who work hybrid. Better to have them sprawl around Peterborough than on Grade A farmland near Niagara. It expands the labour and services markets in the cities that it connects. Ottawa and Montreal would effectively become one market. And it improves the resiliency of our travel infrastructure but offering a reliable alternative to weather susceptible road and air.

But it doesn't win even a tenth of the votes as a tax cut or grant program....
While the Peterborough area doesn't grow the tender fruit that Niagara does, it's mostly Class 1 farmland. Peterborough County has more Class 1 land than Niagara Region by the looks of it. Either way, both are subject to the density targets of the Growth Plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4498  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2023, 1:03 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
If Toronto - Ottawa - Montreal is Phase 1, what phase would a Calgary - Edmonton be thought of? Would all of the Corridor from Windsor to Quebec City be done long before something outside of the Corridor?
How much real interest has been expressed by the Alberta government and the cities of Edmonton and Calgary? They could help by at least promoting such a project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4499  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2023, 2:03 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
How much real interest has been expressed by the Alberta government and the cities of Edmonton and Calgary? They could help by at least promoting such a project.
A simple google search shows that it seems that the only acceptable thing there is HSR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4500  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2023, 11:09 PM
rbt rbt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
... what phase would a Calgary - Edmonton be thought of?
The Alberta government promised that route to TransPod. I'm not sure the current government would accept a VIA service in that corridor even if the federal government fully funded the project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.