HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2022, 6:14 AM
Wpgstvsouth94 Wpgstvsouth94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 353
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2022, 6:43 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,266
__________________
instagram: @jeff_vernaus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2022, 9:03 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
Interesting little tease about The Bay building , as well as about future surface lot construction. While I think it's probably SOP for CentreVenture to put a positive spin on their projects, Matheson seemed very hopeful about the city's incentives for future surface lot development.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2022, 9:44 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Colour me skeptical.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2022, 11:11 PM
Tbone04 Tbone04 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 3
Would there be a use for another casino, which could gear people to spend time downtown.

What I hate most about our downtown is there isn't a ton of things to go downtown for. So we need different things to go and do downtown. Then you can revitalize the Portage place mall. Shopping won't work downtown until you have a viable amount of people and traffic doing things downtown, including residential, hotels etc.

I'm not sure our city needs another big casino but it would seem to be a good option. You could have a couple floors, with the exterior footprint a hotel option. Plenty of space to include a good restaurant, and another event center (could struggle with the surrounding venues but could also attract smaller shows and comedy etc). Rooftop patio/bar.

And because it's so big, you probably could include a big swimming pool and water slides for the hotel and possibly other activities such as something like Activate, escape rooms and such.

It's a huge building, and if we could fill it up with as much "attractions/activities etc, it will give people another reason to go downtown to do something. Plus, people from out of town it becomes a great spot to check out especially if they are staying in the downtown region.

In the end, I hope it's not offices. We've got plenty of towel office spaces available, and more towers can be built. Strictly residential probably can't work. And stores isn't going to draw people downtown without other stuff first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2022, 11:58 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
I have been pushing to have it made a casino for a while now. It can be a larger version of casino regina with a hotel for the higher floors. Downtown should be a entertainment and business district not shopping as that will never work there ever again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 12:01 AM
thebasketballgeek's Avatar
thebasketballgeek thebasketballgeek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Rimouski, Québec
Posts: 1,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbone04 View Post

What I hate most about our downtown is there isn't a ton of things to go downtown for.
Uhmm this is not true Downtown has by far the most entertainment options within the city. The Forks, Exchange District, Canada life, Human rights museum, lots of restaurants, post-secondary education, convention Center etc… I guess the reason this perception exists because the entertainment is too spread out.

Casino I have mixed feelings about because it will generate quite a lot of revenue at that location but I’d rather if people lived there instead and then have commercial in the first floor. Make it the most gorgeous 5 over 1 in town.

Or let’s say screw it and finally build that indoor water park we’ve been dreaming of!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 12:05 AM
peg's Avatar
peg peg is offline
keep the good times going
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Downtown Winnipeg
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbone04 View Post
...could include a big swimming pool and water slides...
The fabled world-class Winnipeg waterpark we have all been waiting for?

For real though, Portage place would be a great location for a water park or something like that. It could be tied into a broader reimagined complex with a community centre, residential, hotel and commercial.

Last edited by peg; Mar 4, 2022 at 5:16 AM. Reason: Clarified where I was referring to
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 12:58 AM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
I think portage place would be a better place for the water park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 1:02 AM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by peg View Post
The fabled world-class Winnipeg waterpark we have all been waiting for?

For real though, that would be a great location for a water park or something like that. It could be tied into a broader reimagined complex with a community centre, residential, hotel and commercial.
For sure!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 1:13 AM
WildCake WildCake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
I think portage place would be a better place for the water park
Make a joint proposal with the Bay as a casino and PP as a waterpark and hotel. The rest of downtown will flourish after that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 1:49 AM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCake View Post
Make a joint proposal with the Bay as a casino and PP as a waterpark and hotel. The rest of downtown will flourish after that.
Would be the best option for the area in my mind as those would attract people and economic activities unlike another mall no one goes to
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 5:15 AM
peg's Avatar
peg peg is offline
keep the good times going
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Downtown Winnipeg
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
I think portage place would be a better place for the water park
I agree, I thought the original post was referring to portage place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 2:08 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,925
I would suspect The Bay will be a mixture of ground floor retail, office, hotel and residential, maybe with an entertainment/hospitality attraction of some kind. IMO this would be an appropriate use for the building.

In her CJOB interview Matheson commented that The Bay building had roughly the same amount of square footage as the Richardson Building. DK if that's true, but if it's close it's an eye opener. I knew the place was big, but that's a huge job to fill that amount of space. I'm looking forward to seeing the proposal.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 3:22 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
Just for shits and giggles, here are some of the larger buildings downtown:

360 Main – 761,789
Hydro – 695,000
The Bay – 655,755
201 Portage – 506,413
Richardson – 476,399
CityPlace – 451,892
Air Canada – 368,571
True North Square – 357,000 (Tower 1)

**Info from the BOMA 2021 Commercial Building Directory
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York

Last edited by Biff; Mar 4, 2022 at 4:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 3:46 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ A good illustration of the sheer scale of the problem.

If we were in this situation in 2003 when the economy was in decent shape, we had a mayor with vision and we had a provincial government that took urban issues to heart, I'd have been much more optimistic.

Now with all of those factors gone plus the impact of covid on the downtown population, it is a much more daunting prospect. In some respects the best thing we can do is to come up with something, anything, that keeps the lights and heat on in the building until a long-term use can be found during better times. This approach has worked for other important buildings... the Aboriginal Centre of Winnipeg has basically used a bare-bones budget to keep the old CPR station standing and filling an important need in the process.

I will be curious to see what this plan consists of. I would be very surprised if it included commercial elements like private sector office space, major retail or market-rate housing. I am expecting a hodgepodge of government-backed functions, e.g. the 4th floor which used to do millions of dollars in retail sales a year will now become a children's art space or some such. But again, if it keeps the lights on that may be enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 7:27 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Just for shits and giggles, here are some of the larger buildings downtown:

360 Main – 761,789
Hydro – 695,000
The Bay – 655,755
201 Portage – 506,413
Richardson – 476,399
CityPlace – 451,892
Air Canada – 368,571
True North Square – 357,000 (Tower 1)

**Info from the BOMA 2021 Commercial Building Directory
...and Eaton's was almost 900,000 sf!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 7:28 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ A good illustration of the sheer scale of the problem.

If we were in this situation in 2003 when the economy was in decent shape, we had a mayor with vision and we had a provincial government that took urban issues to heart, I'd have been much more optimistic.

Now with all of those factors gone plus the impact of covid on the downtown population, it is a much more daunting prospect. In some respects the best thing we can do is to come up with something, anything, that keeps the lights and heat on in the building until a long-term use can be found during better times. This approach has worked for other important buildings... the Aboriginal Centre of Winnipeg has basically used a bare-bones budget to keep the old CPR station standing and filling an important need in the process.

I will be curious to see what this plan consists of. I would be very surprised if it included commercial elements like private sector office space, major retail or market-rate housing. I am expecting a hodgepodge of government-backed functions, e.g. the 4th floor which used to do millions of dollars in retail sales a year will now become a children's art space or some such. But again, if it keeps the lights on that may be enough.
its good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 7:42 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
^^^as I ask for all projects - are they building this on top?

__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2022, 7:46 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,747
phase 2.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.