HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2011, 5:20 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
Sadly, the work going on is for more residential development, not an extention of Bradley. Don't expect that any time soon.
I think we need to go slap somebody down at city hall...seems like this would be a no brainer to do sooner than later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2011, 2:57 AM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,016
Although I haven't seen the most recent work as I'm in Toronto, I would speculate a section of Bradley Ave will be built to service new residential development, but not actually functioning as an extension yet as it won't connect to White Oak Road.

Last time I was down there I noticed work going on west of the intersection, although I would speculate it is more commercial development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2011, 3:28 AM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,239
Here's a partial-y interchange I made in Simcity 4 that was inspired by the 401/402 junction in London.

Click for full size:
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2011, 3:30 AM
go_leafs_go02 go_leafs_go02 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, ON
Posts: 2,406
it even includes that weird sudden jog on the 402 right when you get off the 401.

Still can't believe that hasn't been fixed fully. All of a sudden, the curve radius sharpens to meet the old extent from when the 401 was widened a few years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2011, 3:34 AM
Kokkei Mizu's Avatar
Kokkei Mizu Kokkei Mizu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
You forgot the high-mast lighting!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2011, 3:25 PM
Snark Snark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
I think we need to go slap somebody down at city hall...seems like this would be a no brainer to do sooner than later.
Except that for the most part, the City is not in the business of building new roads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2011, 3:31 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by go_leafs_go02 View Post
it even includes that weird sudden jog on the 402 right when you get off the 401.

Still can't believe that hasn't been fixed fully. All of a sudden, the curve radius sharpens to meet the old extent from when the 401 was widened a few years ago.
Yeah I tried to make it as accurate as I could based on the limitations of the game. That curve is pretty abrupt for a 400-series, especially due to the fact that you take it going 100+. It's pretty scary during the night too because the lighting system ends just before the curve begins.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kokkei Mizu View Post
You forgot the high-mast lighting!
Well I didn't want to clutter it so you could see the roads themselves. I'll probably add some lighting and soundwalls next and then maybe develop the surrounding area.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 12:39 AM
Wharn's Avatar
Wharn Wharn is offline
Torontonian Refugee
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxy County
Posts: 982
What is this weird jog everyone's talking about? I've been on that interchange a half dozen times and never noticed any such thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 2:41 AM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wharn View Post
What is this weird jog everyone's talking about? I've been on that interchange a half dozen times and never noticed any such thing.

You can see it here, 1:40 in.
Video Link


It's a rather sharp curve for a 100+ speed. There's no hazard signs, and the lighting ends just before the curve begins.

It's really not that bad, but it is noticeable.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 3:08 AM
go_leafs_go02 go_leafs_go02 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, ON
Posts: 2,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
You can see it here, 1:40 in.
Video Link


It's a rather sharp curve for a 100+ speed. There's no hazard signs, and the lighting ends just before the curve begins.

It's really not that bad, but it is noticeable.
It really look like the construction limits from the 401 widening didn't go far enough along the 402 westbound to ensure that curve would be taken care of. They did some resurfacing there, so it isn't as bad as before, but still, it's like 2 separate curves join up at a weird angle/jog.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 4:21 AM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
MTO could've picked so many better junctions for 401/402.

While a through/cross city route would've been preferable, they picked such a weak one, Route E. Think if they had picked Route F! An interchange at Wonderland/Wharncliffe, a de facto west end freeway as it ran close to London and something that would've alleviated west end traffic.

Of course the current route doesn't do a damn thing for anyone travelling in London

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 6:27 PM
Wharn's Avatar
Wharn Wharn is offline
Torontonian Refugee
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxy County
Posts: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
You can see it here, 1:40 in.

It's a rather sharp curve for a 100+ speed. There's no hazard signs, and the lighting ends just before the curve begins.

It's really not that bad, but it is noticeable.
Again, didn't really notice anything out of the ordinary. Maybe it's just because I'm used to driving on terrible two-lane highways, but for me that looks just like a normal interchange.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpmasterdac View Post
While a through/cross city route would've been preferable, they picked such a weak one, Route E. Think if they had picked Route F! An interchange at Wonderland/Wharncliffe, a de facto west end freeway as it ran close to London and something that would've alleviated west end traffic.
Route F would have also run right through two major obstacles: a "high-value" natural area and the Wharncliffe-Wonderland-Exeter triangle of doom. I wonder if any of that had an effect on the final decision.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 9:19 PM
Simpseatles's Avatar
Simpseatles Simpseatles is offline
Wannabe Urbanite
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Waterloo/London
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpmasterdac View Post
Of course the current route doesn't do a damn thing for anyone travelling in London
]
While I don't technically live in London (I'm just east of town) my family uses the 401/402 to get to West London sometimes.
__________________
"Sometimes I wonder if the world's so small, that we can never get away from the sprawl.
Living in the sprawl the dead shopping malls rise like mountains beyond mountains and there's no end in sight." -Arcade Fire
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 9:51 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,016
Techically they chose a combination of H and E - notice Route H runs west of Delaware, close to the junction of Highways 2 and 81.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2011, 12:09 AM
Snark Snark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpmasterdac View Post
MTO could've picked so many better junctions for 401/402.

While a through/cross city route would've been preferable, they picked such a weak one, Route E. Think if they had picked Route F! An interchange at Wonderland/Wharncliffe, a de facto west end freeway as it ran close to London and something that would've alleviated west end traffic.
Actually, the final route was comprised of very little of the study routes shown, and for good reason: most of the Delaware Valley is sensitive watershed and Carolinian forest. Hence the reason for a provincial park, 4 conservation areas, and two privately owned natural areas in the immediate area surrounding Delaware. The village itself is one of the oldest in Upper Canada west of Toronto. As such, there was great opposition to any routing west of the city being proposed for the freeway during the assessment stage. I agree that it has not done much for City traffic patterns other that Wellington/Exeter Roads, but the ultimate route chosen was likely the least damaging in terms of social and environmental disruption for a 401 connection west of the city in face of substantial local opposition.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpmasterdac View Post
Of course the current route doesn't do a damn thing for anyone travelling in London
That wasn't really the intention of the 402. Its primary function was intended to take the rapidly growing (primarily transport) traffic off of the run from the 401 to the Sarnia border via highways 126/2/81/22. Towns such as Lambeth, Delaware, Mt.Brydges, and Strathroy were being overrun. In current times without the 402 it would be unbearable for these communities. It would also be a serious hindrance to trade at the border.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2011, 3:20 AM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,239
blanked post
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff

Last edited by haljackey; Nov 4, 2011 at 4:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2011, 4:14 AM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wharn View Post
Route F would have also run right through two major obstacles: a "high-value" natural area and the Wharncliffe-Wonderland-Exeter triangle of doom. I wonder if any of that had an effect on the final decision.
The environmental concerns would be reasonable, except London still has planned a west end north-south freeway on moreless the same route F proposed by the 402 40 years ago. Only different is the city could have had 402 paid 80% by the provincial government and had 1/2 a ring for a ring road. Now anything would be paid by city or have less favourable kick-ins by senior levels of government. 40 years still behind the times

The triangle of doom did not exist at that time, Wonderland had yet to be extended south, Only Exeter & Wharncliffe met.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snark View Post
That wasn't really the intention of the 402. Its primary function was intended to take the rapidly growing (primarily transport) traffic off of the run from the 401 to the Sarnia border via highways 126/2/81/22. Towns such as Lambeth, Delaware, Mt.Brydges, and Strathroy were being overrun. In current times without the 402 it would be unbearable for these communities. It would also be a serious hindrance to trade at the border.
Dead on 402 was to be a trade route to Sarnia was the primary goal, which was the number one goal. The province wanted to kill 2 birds at once though, having 402 being a trade route that would also benefit London as a freeway too. Unfortunately the city sat on its hands for years, allowed the Labatt family to influence the province and move the freeway so far north that would make the costs unpalatable.

Ultimately London squandered any chance of getting a freeway constructed that could've benefited the city, whether in the north and east or southwest, The route picked was out of London until we took over small villages and still doesn't benefit us as an in-city route would.

BTW nice pic of merging that map with a wonder one, how you do that?

Last edited by Pimpmasterdac; Nov 20, 2011 at 7:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2011, 4:44 AM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,239
Since there was much discussion that resulted from the 401/402 junction I made in SC4, I whipped up a quick recreation of the Wellington/401 interchange.

Click for full size.


Yes, Kokkei Mizu, I included the light towers this time
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2011, 5:23 AM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 699
Ring road to nowhere

Interesting Article in LFP, ongoing series about transportation.

Quote:

It was supposed to be a brass ring of highways, a cross-town expressway through north London to speed travel through the city. But you won't find it on any map.

In the 1960s the Ontario government offered to pay 80% of the cost as part of a highway that would wind from the Hwy. 401 to Sarnia.

That ring of a highway was attractive enough to a city council in 1966 voted unanimously in its favour.
http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2.../18994151.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2011, 4:11 AM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpmasterdac View Post
Interesting Article in LFP, ongoing series about transportation.



http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/2.../18994151.html
It was an interesting read, although it didn't have a whole lot of "new" information. The one thing I didn't know was how low the traffic projections were for the northern leg of the ring road.

I think the northern leg of the ring road would be viable if it were part of a new provincial highway connecting Highway 402 near Strathroy to the planned Highway 7/8 freeway extension between Stratford and Kitchener, as it would provide a new link from K-W and Toronto to the U.S. border, while taking pressure off Highway 401.

In my opinion though, such a highway is a long way off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:49 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.