HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 5:50 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
This project feels too 'Skycity' to me.

Not enough real money chasing it.
No kidding, sounds like the whole business model is "give us $60M tax dollars"!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 11:39 AM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by pegcityboy View Post
With this being on our major thoroughfare along with the Bay wouldn’t it be prudent maybe if the feds are not coming to the party ( no idea why not $20 million is nothing to Trudeau Government) that the city and province give an extra 10 million each so this plan can come to fruition ? As long as Starlight have their ducks in a row and credible ! Would not like to see boarded up Bay building AND rundown Portage Place would be a bad representation of downtown and Winnipeg to visitors and traveling business people! Any thoughts ?
Maybe that's why Pallister has been holding back in spending federal funding in other areas? Completely conjecture on my part, but it seems like he was pretty supportive of this project. I've wondered if he secretly had a "plan B" to kick in the rest of the funding if the Feds fell through??
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 12:24 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Only The Lonely.. View Post
This project feels too 'Skycity' to me.

Not enough real money chasing it.
Agreed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 2:29 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
No kidding, sounds like the whole business model is "give us $60M tax dollars"!
I don't have all the details, but I don't believe there is a ton of "actual" dollars being given to Starlight by the City and the Province. Both of their contributions are heavy on the tax free portions and other incentives per unit of affordable housing.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 2:31 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wigglez View Post
Did you give her a firm timeline to respond? Maybe, much like the feds with this project, she's waiting for a very specific day to respond finally?
Well its been 3 years now!

Based on the tone in the article. Sounds like they submitted an application and have heard zero from the Feds. Like at all. Did they just send in some papers and then sit around? Wouldn't they have some sort of contact they call to discuss this topic?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 4:14 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
I'm getting bad vibes from this proposal. Pre-covid I might have thought some good would come of it, but let's face it, with downtown having been eviscerated since this was first pitched a year and a half ago (few workers around, no events, shops and restaurants closing) it's clear that this is a pretty tough time to start a new project on a massive scale like what Starlight is proposing. You have to wonder if the real business plan is to just squeeze as much money as they can out of the various levels of government to buy an asset that government mostly paid for in the first place.

It would be a bit different if the developer had a solid reputation, but is that something these guys have?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 5:22 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 14,316
I have no idea about them.

Remind me again how this affects Railside. Is this the group that is/was buying the parkade as part of the mall purchase? So if this falls through, then Railside is likely on hold?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 8:50 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,801
More details in a CBC article. Including comments from Vandal about increased asks a week and a half ago including $240mm in loans.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...hase-1.5933566
__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 9:10 PM
(sub)urban (sub)urban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
More details in a CBC article. Including comments from Vandal about increased asks a week and a half ago including $240mm in loans.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...hase-1.5933566
LOL. Sounds like that's all she wrote about that one.

Time of death, March 2nd, 2021.

Figured there must've been more to it than Starlight was letting on. Trudeau wouldn't kill this project over an innocent $20M in funding right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 9:20 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by (sub)urban View Post
LOL. Sounds like that's all she wrote about that one.

Time of death, March 2nd, 2021.

Figured there must've been more to it than Starlight was letting on. Trudeau wouldn't kill this project over an innocent $20M in funding right now.
I agree. Sad, but maybe for the best if the deal is going to keep getting worse and worse.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 9:21 PM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,138
If the Portage Place reno project does not come to fruition, My hopes for a concrete plan for The Bay Building reno is quite dim.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 9:34 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,213
^ the two don't need to be dependant on each other.

Portage Place remains a (fading) going concern - even if this development doesn't go thru.

It may be better to focus funding and attention towards the Bay. Portage Place can wait for another day, and perhaps a more well healed developer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 9:35 PM
The Unknown Poster The Unknown Poster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,001
Maybe if they wait long enough, True North will want it. Might make a nice location for a new arena in 20 years :-)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 9:50 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Downtown progress seems to have nose dived in Bowman second term dead bay Portage place that is incredibly difficult to redevelop Winnipeg square literally crumbling as we speak old tribune site still undeveloped. I had high hopes for Bowman in 2014 that he would attract new business to the city being former head of the chamber of commerce but the opposite seems to have happened and his only legacy will be more bike paths.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 9:59 PM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
^ the two don't need to be dependant on each other.

Portage Place remains a (fading) going concern - even if this development doesn't go thru.

It may be better to focus funding and attention towards the Bay. Portage Place can wait for another day, and perhaps a more well healed developer.
I hear ya.
However, I would think, had the Portage Place project received the green light The Bay would actually get more momentum behind it so they could compliment one each other since they could be planned out with care & less duplication of retailers or whatever was to come... Just saying.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 10:04 PM
T'Cona T'Cona is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
Downtown progress seems to have nose dived in Bowman second term dead bay Portage place that is incredibly difficult to redevelop Winnipeg square literally crumbling as we speak old tribune site still undeveloped. I had high hopes for Bowman in 2014 that he would attract new business to the city being former head of the chamber of commerce but the opposite seems to have happened and his only legacy will be more bike paths.
I do not see him as a champion of downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 10:38 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,797
Yeah with the recent revelations on CBC, it either signals that Starlight was looking for a guaranteed “no” to wiggle out of this plan due to the pandemic’s effects on the retail landscape (or other reasons), or they are shady as fuck like the last guys (Fortress).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 11:15 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by WinCitySparky View Post
Yeah with the recent revelations on CBC, it either signals that Starlight was looking for a guaranteed “no” to wiggle out of this plan due to the pandemic’s effects on the retail landscape (or other reasons), or they are shady as fuck like the last guys (Fortress).
Sounds about right. When you consider downtown Winnipeg's sharp downturn over the past year (not Bowman's fault), I would imagine the project is much less enticing to them now than it was two years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 11:18 PM
Danny D Oh Danny D Oh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 873
My libertarian friends won't like this but short of leaving steaming piles of rubble in Downtown Winnipeg the three levels of government need to lead a development plan. Handing over billions to would-be developers is getting us nowhere. Create a Crown and invest that way. Affordable housing and general mixed-use development can be the core principles. Create jobs, create economic activity, collect taxes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2021, 1:51 AM
Alexander 90 Alexander 90 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 24
These clowns are the definition of Corporate Welfare. They will ask for more money when they are 1/2 done, or they will say they will not finish.
If a local developer is not interested, this is a bad project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.