HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2023, 5:52 PM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 584
I just popped into the Ralph Lauren store on Michigan Avenue and the staff there said it was the busiest weekend they've ever had and the store set a sales record. Just one data point, but it's some positive Michigan Avenue and Chicago-as-destination news. Michigan Ave has its problems, but if sales numbers are still getting blown out there, it means there's still enough foot traffic on big days to justify high rents and a statement retail presence. I have to imagine as online sales become a bigger and bigger part of consumer sales, the physical stores that do exist are going to be in a small number of statement locations. For Michigan Ave to remain one of those locations is a matter of not screwing it up more than anything else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2023, 4:40 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrdoSeclorum View Post
I just popped into the Ralph Lauren store on Michigan Avenue and the staff there said it was the busiest weekend they've ever had and the store set a sales record. Just one data point, but it's some positive Michigan Avenue and Chicago-as-destination news. Michigan Ave has its problems, but if sales numbers are still getting blown out there, it means there's still enough foot traffic on big days to justify high rents and a statement retail presence. I have to imagine as online sales become a bigger and bigger part of consumer sales, the physical stores that do exist are going to be in a small number of statement locations. For Michigan Ave to remain one of those locations is a matter of not screwing it up more than anything else.
I don't make it down there much anymore, but even last year over the holiday season was pretty busy everywhere I went on a few days. I wonder how the sales are doing at various stores. There is a perception issue obviously - we'll see what happens. There are stores opening though soon there and in areas like Oak St. Curious to see what happens though.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2023, 4:31 PM
jboy560's Avatar
jboy560 jboy560 is offline
Cap ou pas cap?
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, baby!
Posts: 261
[QUOTE=OrdoSeclorum;10089364]I just popped into the Ralph Lauren store on Michigan Avenue and the staff there said it was the busiest weekend they've ever had and the store set a sales record. Just one data point, but it's some positive Michigan Avenue and Chicago-as-destination news. Michigan Ave has its problems, but if sales numbers are still getting blown out there, it means there's still enough foot traffic on big days to justify high rents and a statement retail presence. I have to imagine as online sales become a bigger and bigger part of consumer sales, the physical stores that do exist are going to be in a small number of statement locations. For Michigan Ave to remain one of those locations is a matter of not screwing it up more than anything else.[/QUOTE]

Just came across this article which supports what you’re saying.

Crowds, record day of revenue point to comeback on Chicago's Magnificent Mile

“ According to The Magnificent Mile Association, a record $31.7 million in revenue was set in November on a single day.” The article also mentions that shoplifting and theft are down significantly compared to before the pandemic, which is also welcome news and appears to be bucking national trends.

https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news...nificent-mile/
__________________
myspace.com/jboy560
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2023, 5:21 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
This is absolutely fantastic news all around......

While I don't expect retail on the Mag Mile to ever return to it's hey day, I still think there's a huge opportunity to do something with it to keep it as an iconic staple of Chicago. I.E., reduce lanes of traffic, make it a boulevard, have patio restaurant cafe/restaurants, etc, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2023, 5:42 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
This is absolutely fantastic news all around......

While I don't expect retail on the Mag Mile to ever return to it's hey day, I still think there's a huge opportunity to do something with it to keep it as an iconic staple of Chicago. I.E., reduce lanes of traffic, make it a boulevard, have patio restaurant cafe/restaurants, etc, etc.
Only way to do that is to reform IDOT. They wouldn't allow that to happen currently. They are not even willing to create a bus lane even though Michigan Ave has constant bus traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2023, 8:13 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,683
whats IDOTs deal exactly. like why are they the way they are, and is there no recognition reform needs to take place? surely they see the issues this rigidness creates at a local infrastructure level
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2023, 4:04 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,696
How NanoGraf's new factory positions Chicago to be a battery capital for the US
Quote:
NanoGraf Corp. is ready to make Chicago a battery capital for the entire United States. The Chicago-headquartered battery startup held a ribbon-cutting Friday for its new 17,000-square-foot manufacturing facility in the West Loop.

At peak production, the facility aims to deliver 50 tons per year of silicon oxide, a key competent in batteries, including those that power electric vehicles.

It is the first large-volume silicon oxide manufacturing facility to be commissioned in North America and was made possible through a $10 million Department of Defense contract along with additional tax credits. First started in 2012 at Northwestern University, NanoGraf secured an oversubscribed $65 million Series B funding round in early 2023 and continues to receive support from the military.
https://www.bizjournals.com/chicago/...-facility.html


Pritzker discusses electric vehicle development, labor benefits in Illinois
Quote:
Crain's Chicago Business on Monday hosted Governor JB Pritzker for its "Power Lunch," describing the event as a "fireside chat."

Addressing the Ford Chicago Assembly Plant on the city's Southeast Side, Governor Pritzker mentioned spatial constraints for battery production. However, he expressed optimism about the potential conversion of the plant to build EVs in the future.

"You can convert almost anything, but if you're gonna have a battery plant nearby, which is typically what's happened, you're gonna do it on a larger footprint. I am hopeful that we will get at least the assembly plant continued and growing. Again, battery, not sure," said Pritzker.
https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/pr...ss-power-lunch
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2023, 3:57 PM
pullmanman pullmanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 108
Caddi targets Midwest expansion after closing $89M round, opening Chicago office

Quote:
A global supply chain startup is looking to expand its Midwest presence in the next year.

Founded by a former McKinsey & Co. manufacturing consultant and Apple Inc. engineer, Caddi Inc., which launched in Tokyo in 2017, opened its U.S. headquarters in downtown Chicago earlier this year. With that opening came a pledge of 100 jobs for the city in the next 12 to 18 months.

Caddi has more than 600 employees globally.

When Caddi CEO Yushiro Kato was setting up the business, visiting manufacturing companies across the U.S., he noticed that all the connecting flights were in Chicago. That's when he realized it made the most sense to pick Chicago as the supply chain startup's U.S. HQ, according to Caddi director John Tezuka.

Tezuka added that Kato looked at California before ultimately landing in Chicago. The company operates out of 223 W Jackson Blvd.

"We found that there was a rich source of talent in the Midwest and in Chicago and that the affordability index was much greater," Tezuka said…

Caddi closed an $89 million Series C earlier this year, bringing its total funding to $164 million. The funding round was the largest for any Japanese startup in the first half of 2023, according to Caddi.

The supply chain startup works with manufacturers on issues like procurement and data management. Its software-as-a-service program uses artificial intelligence to turn drawing libraries into searchable assets for manufacturers, fabricators and engineers.
Profile of a company from November but I haven't seen it posted here yet. Reinforces that Chicago's tech scene is strongest in practical areas like supply chain and manufacturing tech. Also, most of their postings are for sales and marketing, which seems to be the majority of tech jobs in the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2023, 10:30 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,297
At least the 2010 resurface of Michigan Ave held up really long. All that bus traffic would destroy conventional pavement in a few years. Whatever that was done, IDOT should use the same mix everywhere
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2023, 2:34 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Not specifically Chicago or the area, but the Illinois DOR released recently its information on number of earners at various income brackets who filed returns, the aggregate income of those, etc. Illinois had a huge jump of those who filed income tax returns with greater than $500K reported adjusted gross income.

The most recently data is for filing year 2021.

__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2024, 4:34 AM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
Obviously a rumor that's been swirling for a while, but more details on not-so-good news:

https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/...ove-to-denver/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2024, 6:50 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
Obviously a rumor that's been swirling for a while, but more details on not-so-good news:

https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/...ove-to-denver/
I think people jump the gun a bit on stories like this.

Quote:
The planning documents filed with the City of Denver that call for potentially 5,000 employes are the site are meant to theoretical and not an immediate plan for the use of the property, an airline official cautioned. United currently maintains corporate operations in several of its hub cities including Houston and Denver.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2024, 3:02 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,679
^^Indeed. However, I believe that news like this is trying to send a message to the City, specifically, about how AA and UA now want out of O'Hare's Global Hub partnership. Essentially 'move forward with the project and it's higher-than-expected-cost, and we leave Chicago.' It's not hard to connect the dots.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2024, 5:21 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
^^Indeed. However, I believe that news like this is trying to send a message to the City, specifically, about how AA and UA now want out of O'Hare's Global Hub partnership. Essentially 'move forward with the project and it's higher-than-expected-cost, and we leave Chicago.' It's not hard to connect the dots.
Yep. One of my best friends is a pilot for UAL (not based in Chicago - never has been).
#5
1) He said he's known about an expansion to DIA for a good 6-8 months now.

2) He said it was never presented as a HQ move, but rather an expansion. But he also said yes there's rumors among people who wouldn't know about HQ move. The CEO went to Air Force so it wouldn't 100% surprise him but he wouldn't think it would be a lot of people if it did actually happen.

3) He thinks it's a political move to get a tax break and other things. He was a pilot for JetBlue before UAL and said they pulled the same thing threatening to move out of NYC and voila, tax break.

4) He said UAL has no issues moving crew members out of places but he said that if they forced upper management to move from Chicago "they'd all quit." BTW he said they just moved 400 crew members (pilots etc) out of Newark because of the wars overseas and they're all pissed off about it.

5) Moving that many people cost wise is astronomical We're talking about tens of millions of dollars from a direct cost standpoint. Indirect costs are even greater. I know from personal experience (my own corporate moves plus moving others thru corporate) how much this costs. A lot of people simply would not uproot their lives. The logistics of doing this is uber complex and would take years. A lot of people have spouses with their own careers too, kids, etc and would not move. The easiest people to move are single people without kids - typically that's who I've moved myself to Chicago as it's easy. Anyone with a family - forget about it unless they're an upper level exec. And even then, many times they don't move. You can look at Oracle as an example. They announced they were moving to Austin over 3 years ago and almost nobody on their executive leadership (C-Suite, SVPs etc) is in Austin. They're all still in the Bay Area. Many execs for Caterpillar are still in the Chicago area. Most of the ones in Texas were hired in a few years ago and already living there. Some have never left Peoria and a few moved directly from Peoria because they never even moved to the Chicago area.


6) Chicago is still a big hub and regardless of where a HQ is, it takes thousands to operate that big of a hub. Delta for example employs nearly 9000 people in NYC area from what I know.

7) UAL hired 3800 people in Chicago in 2023. Don't forget that.

8) UAL said themselves it's hypothetical and for potential future expansion. UAL has made public they are expanding a lot again. They wanted to hire 15,000 people by year end (2023). I know in Houston they're planning to hire 1500 people this year alone.

9) Going off of #5, he told me all relos are paid for by corporate and cost at minimum $20K per person. This is in line with my experiences and the costs are much higher if you are trying to move a homeowner.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing

Last edited by marothisu; Jan 6, 2024 at 6:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2024, 7:40 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,101
All good discussion points.....

I agree that this is all cage rattling to get more money out of the city/state as an exchange for dealing with cost overruns at O'Hare. I am not a fan of this tactic, and if I were a benevolent dictator, I would say "Don't let the door hit you on the way out - Oh, and since you are moving your HQ, we are going to start talking to international airlines to see how they can be a part of the expansion".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2024, 8:44 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
All good discussion points.....

I agree that this is all cage rattling to get more money out of the city/state as an exchange for dealing with cost overruns at O'Hare. I am not a fan of this tactic, and if I were a benevolent dictator, I would say "Don't let the door hit you on the way out - Oh, and since you are moving your HQ, we are going to start talking to international airlines to see how they can be a part of the expansion".

Except that international airlines aren't going to be paying for (partial upfront footing the bill, don't mean an increase in fees) expansion under any circumstances.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2024, 8:26 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
^^Indeed. However, I believe that news like this is trying to send a message to the City, specifically, about how AA and UA now want out of O'Hare's Global Hub partnership. Essentially 'move forward with the project and it's higher-than-expected-cost, and we leave Chicago.' It's not hard to connect the dots.
Indeed. It is a good (and potentially viable) leverage play by UA. I find it hard to imagine that United would try to camp thousands of operation jobs at the Denver Airport. If for no other reason than that, from what I know is that Denver airport has crap for living options anywhere near it. It is not like Denver Int is near a Park Ridge, Elk Grove, or Des Plaines. The idea that you will get a workforce enthusiastic about driving to the DIA airport everyday miles from the Denver metro's fringes is somewhat suspect. Having done that drive from downtown Denver to Denver Int; it would not be nice to do every day.

If this purchase were made for a complex in downtown Auroro (Co) or Denver I would give a potential move far more credence. That said, in the very long term, I think that UA's growth plans are likely centered more around Denver than any other airport metro given Denver's continent location, steady metro growth, and comparatively easy growth potential at the airport itself (i.e. just the expansion of terminals, no need for major runway realignment or noisy neighbors demanding flight caps etc.).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2024, 2:13 PM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
Indeed. It is a good (and potentially viable) leverage play by UA. I find it hard to imagine that United would try to camp thousands of operation jobs at the Denver Airport. If for no other reason than that, from what I know is that Denver airport has crap for living options anywhere near it. It is not like Denver Int is near a Park Ridge, Elk Grove, or Des Plaines. The idea that you will get a workforce enthusiastic about driving to the DIA airport everyday miles from the Denver metro's fringes is somewhat suspect. Having done that drive from downtown Denver to Denver Int; it would not be nice to do every day.

If this purchase were made for a complex in downtown Auroro (Co) or Denver I would give a potential move far more credence. That said, in the very long term, I think that UA's growth plans are likely centered more around Denver than any other airport metro given Denver's continent location, steady metro growth, and comparatively easy growth potential at the airport itself (i.e. just the expansion of terminals, no need for major runway realignment or noisy neighbors demanding flight caps etc.).
I don't think most United corporate jobs are at ORD. In fact, I'm sure they aren't. I believe their offices are in the Sears tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2024, 10:39 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrdoSeclorum View Post
I don't think most United corporate jobs are at ORD. In fact, I'm sure they aren't. I believe their offices are in the Sears tower.
That's right, they are. I should have made my point clear; both before and after the Sears move, when they were in Elk Grove and Mt.Prospect, they were in the thick of the metro area with plenty of housing and transit options for their operations and administrative staff.

In contrast, if they were to build their headquarters on the footprint at DIA, it would be 5-10 miles from the outer fringes of the Denver metro, which is less than ideal from a housing and transit standpoint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 11:56 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,734
It's other HQ is in Boston.


https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/il...-hq-to-chicago

Illinois lands massive investment: Nexamp to bring $2B, new HQ to Chicago

By FOX 32 NewsPublished January 22, 2024 4:50PM



Two billion dollars of investments and a new corporate headquarters are on the way to Illinois.


CHICAGO - A new corporate headquarters is on the way to Illinois.

Gov. J.B. Pritzker announced that Nexamp, the country's largest community solar provider, is expanding into Illinois with Chicago set to become its second national headquarters.


...

The governor's office says Nexamp will bring 50 permanent jobs to Illinois, but the projects they work on will employ thousands.

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.