Quote:
Originally Posted by taboubak
I am all for perserving cultural areas and histroic buildings but Japantown is long dead. It was killed by the Salt Palace. Japantown should play no part in stopping the development of Block 67. They aren't destroying any structures and the churches will remain fully intact.
|
Other than Royal Wood Plaza, no buildings are set to be removed. In fact, an empty parking lot would be developed.
My main issue with the delays on this project are that if enough people get together, they can work to force a developer to pay homage to something that was demolished decades before the project was conceived.
Should APS include an homage to the strip clubs, a radio station, or a dance club? How about Regent Street and the Red Light District in the past. If this is the new case, if a development replaces a parking garage, when the development is replaced in the future, should it show respect to the previous parking garage?
Here with Japantown, there are 2 buildings left, the Temple and the Church. Each on opposite sides of the street and different ends of the 1st South block. The senior housing, Salt Palace and a parking lot are basically the rest of the street.
The first phase of the project was already approved but the RDA and City Council decided to require the developer to change the plans for the first and second phases to include updates for Japantown during the zoning adjustment request for Phase 2 of the project.
If the developer had started construction on phase 1, would they have been required to halt development until things were changed to incorporate adjustments to Japantown?