Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend
|
Why was National-Charles even a considerable option? Why did anyone think this was a good idea? Was there some sort of information gap because no one took the route seriously, then the panel decided on that one because it looked the best by omission?
Otherwise, this decision is literally incomprehensible.
As previous posters have pointed out, the zigzag turn is a nightmare for a major arterial, not to mention it has all the problems of Malkin while costing the most (and being the hardest to build.)
I sent them a reply, let's hope for an answer.