Quote:
Originally Posted by AbortedWalrus
I think they should be rehabbing existing housing stock they already own that isn't used and then giving it to low income people or selling it at market rate if the area isn't sufficiently mixed income. I think turning people into home owners that have a real asset would probably be better for them, because it gives stability and lets them accrue value on it. Once they clear out the inventory of existing structures, which can probably be rehabbed for a fraction of the cost of new construction, then they can start building new stuff.
|
What's the breakdown on cost for rehabbing to bring everything up to code. For example, removal of knob and tube wiring, old cast iron plumbing, any structural issue, remediation of lead paint and asbestos, etc. Any guess whether these costs would equal or exceed new construction.