HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #401  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2023, 1:27 PM
downtown_eddie_brown downtown_eddie_brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 70
Very cool project, if it happens. I can't imagine the remediation work needed for this; Is Stelco paying for the cleanup?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #402  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2023, 5:47 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,812
Seems a bit silly to have that much space dedicated to batteries and not also use it for solar panels.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #403  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2023, 7:40 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton (The Brooklyn of Canada)
Posts: 3,071
I don't think that's enough space for the amount of solar panels that will generate much power.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #404  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2023, 11:40 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
I don't think that's enough space for the amount of solar panels that will generate much power.
Depending on the final building configurations, many of them could have panels on the roof. This may be worthwhile especially if they end up being the large boxes in the concept renders.

The proposal for the one near Copetown is "on hold" now:
https://www.thespec.com/news/propose...amilton-region

Proposed Copetown-area battery storage project 'on hold'
Aypa Power announces 300-megawatt project paused, cancels public meeting
Petition opposing project has garnered nearly 2,200 signatures
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #405  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2023, 4:18 AM
rdaner rdaner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 177
Why would you be against a battery farm? Isn't it like free money for a municipality without a lot of extra services required?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #406  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2023, 6:18 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdaner View Post
Why would you be against a battery farm? Isn't it like free money for a municipality without a lot of extra services required?
From the Spec story:
Quote:
The proposed BESS had drawn concern from area residents and the local councillor due to its proposed location on agricultural land within the Greenbelt. An online petition started by Michelle Lobbezoo in opposition to the project has garnered nearly 2,200 signatures.

“This proposal will turn our agricultural land into an industrial area, affecting our soil, wildlife and wetlands,” the petition reads, noting the land is zoned agricultural, on the Greenbelt and is in proximity to the Hamilton-Brantford Rail Trail and forests. “No long-term safety studies have been done to evaluate risks to health, air and water.”

In addition, area residents started a Facebook group to raise concerns about the project, citing the Greenbelt location and the impact on local watercourses, health impacts and fire hazard issues, among others.

In an email prior to the project being put on hold, Ward 12 Coun. Craig Cassar said while in concept, BESS technology is an excellent idea, developing on a greenfield site within the Greenbelt is an “odd choice.”

He noted the city has suddenly seen two companies come forward — Aypa and NRStor — looking for council endorsement, as that would make their bid more competitive in the Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) proposal process. He noted the IESO is currently open for bids from BESS companies, with a deadline of Dec. 12.

However, Cassar said at the time he would “not support any such undertaking without a full review by staff, which would include a rigorous assessment of the suitability of the location.”

The project did not receive municipal endorsement at the City of Hamilton’s Nov. 15 general issues committee meeting.

In an interview following the announcement, Cassar said he hopes Aypa — and proponents of similar projects — come back with proposals for brownfield areas, which he said “makes a lot more sense” than the Copetown-area location.

“Battery energy storage systems are an important climate tool — it’s just location is important, as well,” he said. “Building in the Greenbelt, after we’ve just had a significant Greenbelt win with the province, doesn’t make a lot of sense.”
Had this been in a developed suburban area, I'm sure the petitioners would have raised noise, parking and traffic as issues as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #407  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2023, 2:59 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
I don't think that's enough space for the amount of solar panels that will generate much power.
Probably the best way to build solar infrastructure is to use all these spaces that are bit, but not powerplant big. Because there’s a lot of those spaces around and we’re already using them. (Rather than gobbling up farmland.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #408  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:02 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,821
'Huge, generational project' planned for Stelco lands will give east-enders waterfront access: developer

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamil...ium%3Dsharebar


The massive property stretches from around Sherman Avenue North to Ottawa Avenue North, and north from Burlington Street to the Hamilton Harbour. The area is three times larger than Hamilton's official downtown core, according to Steven Dejonckheere, senior vice-president at Slate and the project lead for the development, known as Steelport.

"It really is city-building," he said, describing the scale of the project, which will be clearly visible from the Burlington Skyway Bridge.

Stelco will continue to use part of the property. According to a report Slate submitted to the City of Hamilton planning department in February, "Stelco's current operations consist of a single remaining coke battery scheduled to be decommissioned in the next few years and the cold-rolled steel mill which is intended to remain for the foreseeable future."

...

An area between eight and 16 hectares of the site is targeted for active remediation from contamination left by the mill, he added, while saying the rest passes the bar for new commercial and industrial development.

The report Slate submitted to the city in February was a draft plan of subdivision, which lays out the location of future roads and city blocks – the "overarching master plan," as Dejonckheere described it. "We're not designing buildings, just figuring out where the buildings will go" at this phase, he said.

"In an ideal world," the city will conditionally approve those plans later this year and construction will start in 2025, he said, adding it will take about eight to 10 years to build out the roads and blocks before the next phase of the project begins.

The city told CBC Hamilton it received the draft plan earlier this spring, planning staff reviewed it and the application for the project was "deemed complete" on June 6. "A statutory public meeting will be scheduled in the coming months to ensure community members have an opportunity to share their feedback on the plans," Anita Fabac, acting director of planning and chief planner, wrote in an email.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #409  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:02 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,821
If the city had a brain, they would expedite this in any way possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #410  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:08 PM
ihateittoo's Avatar
ihateittoo ihateittoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: hamiltron//montreal
Posts: 269
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #411  
Old Posted Yesterday, 7:41 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
If the city had a brain, they would expedite this in any way possible.
I'd think they will. No NIMBYs to worry about, and any politician who tries to grandstand about this will soon discover that there's no hill to die upon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #412  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:21 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,276
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
I'd think they will. No NIMBYs to worry about, and any politician who tries to grandstand about this will soon discover that there's no hill to die upon.
Are you sure there are not any trees that need to be saved? Maybe that is not a thing outside of Ward 2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #413  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:56 PM
TheHonestMaple's Avatar
TheHonestMaple TheHonestMaple is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,740
I feel like this project will never happen. I hope it does. But I just don't think the demand is there for it. And I also just get the feeling they are feeding us pretty renders, and if it does happen it won't look anything like it.

I wish Slate would focus their efforts on Corktown Condos.... which appear to have completely fizzled out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:13 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.