Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin
Beyond the 80's, someone had the bright idea of bringing all foot traffic to the ground surface. This is good to a certain extent, but when a city gets more crowded, it is good to have alternatives.
|
Worst idea in a wet city.
The ideal is actually to have a bi-level sidewalk, where the ground serves transit/taxi's, bikes and the upper level is foot traffic and restaurant patio's. Then when it rains, you just use the lower level.
I kind of hate how buildings in Metro Vancouver have increased the ground-level sidewalk space, and yet nobody uses that space for the intended purpose because it's a pain to setup and tear down patio furniture on the whim of the weather. Part of this is cities like Vancouver and Burnaby not actually having the zoning define what can go in it. It's such a waste to see like "parking space" sized patio areas, and what's actually in the building is like a dentist office. If the building has 800sq ft of sidewalk/patio space, then that building should have a restaurant, or permit a food truck to use that space.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster
Having lived in Toronto for years, the PATH is a miserable place.
Vancouver has no where near the downtown office density to support a similar network either.
|
Funny, yet buildings like the Bentall centre have underground businesses (though many of them are closed, and there's not a lot of foot traffic) same with the Royal Center on the other side.
These underground spaces exist, just they're not connected in ways that make a lot of sense. Like how do I get from Waterfront to Bentall to Granville? Take the Skytrain, because the only other way is to walk it in the wet weather.