Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7
That is correct. If you try go big time and you’re unprepared or inexperienced, you are at fault if/when you fail, which happens more often than not in this industry.
|
I understand, but since McHugh is the GC, all decisions made by their subs fall on their feet.
And if McHugh signed-off on a glazing system that has ultimately proved faulty, regardless of a subcontractor being responsible for convincing whomever that it was a system that would work, McHugh will be liable for any damages incurred, via liquidated damages, mediation, or most-likely in this scenario because the delay is so egregious, litigation.
Any issues related to means and methods of a construction project are very clearly laid out in contracts between the client and that GC - legal responsibility overrides any issues related to 'perception', because inexperience of any sub or vendor means that the GC did most likely did not properly do their due diligence in hiring a glazing sub that could produce work that is under the typical standard of care expected of them. Same standards apply for architects/professional designers.